|
|
|
|
Social liberalism
|
| |
|
| |
Social liberalism, also called new liberalism (as it was originally termed), radical liberalism, modern liberalism, or in North America and the United Kingdom simply liberalism, is a branch of liberalism which contends that society must protect liberty and opportunity for all citizens and that the state may have a role on this. For social liberals the lack of education, health, or employment is seen as a major threat to the freedom of state compulsion and coercion. Like other liberals, social liberals support (with qualifications) free markets, private entrepreneurship and a small state. Social liberalism may also refer, as it usually does in the media, to support for among other things educational reform, civil rights, human rights and civil liberties, particularly in opposition to traditional values and beliefs. In this second sense, the liberal equivalent of social conservatism, one may therefore be socially liberal but economically conservative as in neo-liberalism, but in the first sense social liberalism clearly deals with the economic as well as social dimension of politics. Social liberals support a mixed economy of mainly private enterprise with some state provided, guaranteed or regulated public services. For example, some social liberals defend obligatory universal health insurance, with the state paying a basic health insurance to the most poor of the society. Like all liberals, social liberals believe in individual freedom as a central concept. In the process, they expect legitimate governments to provide a basic level of welfare or workfare, health and education, supported by taxation, intending to secure economic opportunities for all, enable the best use of the talents of the population, prevent revolution, or simply for the perceived public good, and they accept some restrictions in economic affairs, such as anti-trust laws to combat economic monopolies and regulatory bodies or minimum wage laws. Moreover, the accumulation of wealth by a small group is seen as the consolidation of power within a small faction of society and, therefore, seen as a threat to liberty.
Social liberalism forms the core of the somewhat wider movement of left-liberalism, with which it is often (if not usually) conflated and has been a label used by progressive liberal parties in order to differentiate themselves from classical liberal parties, especially when there are two or more liberal parties in a country.
The birth of social liberalismIn Britain, in the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, a group of thinkers known as the New Liberals made a case against laissez-faire classical liberalism and in favor of state intervention in social, economic and cultural life. The New Liberals, who included T.H. Green and L.T. Hobhouse, saw individual liberty, especially as positive liberty, as something to be achievable only under favorable social and economic circumstances.
The poverty, squalor and ignorance in which many people lived made it impossible in their view for freedom and individuality to flourish, and the New Liberals believed that these conditions could only be ameliorated through collective action coordinated by a strong welfare-oriented interventionist state.
Social liberalism versus classical liberalismClassical liberalism believes that the provision of negative freedom constitutes liberty and is therefore a strictly laissez-faire philosophy. Social liberalism however sees a role for the State in providing positive liberty for individuals. They believe that lack of positive rights, such as economic opportunity, education, health-care, and so on can be considered to be threats to liberty.
Classical liberals such as Milton Friedman, Nozick, Mises, Hayek and others reject social liberalism as a true liberalism. For these authors government has no duty to intervene in society to aid the disadvantaged as this means taking wealth from others (as taxes). They also consider that interfering in the market is destroying freedom and doing this to make people free is self-contradictory.
Social liberalism versus conservative liberalismBoth share the concern with the freedom of the individual, but while social liberalism is appropriate for describing some liberal parties that are left-of-centre on economic issues and support a broad interpretation of democratic rights, Conservative liberalism emphasizes economic freedom and tends to be right of centre. For example, Conservative liberal parties, such as the Dutch People's Party for Freedom and Democracy and the German Free Democratic Party adopt an economically conservative agenda, advocating a minimal role for the state in the economy. Some authors, like Merquior, also claim that conservative liberalism is based on the concept of negative liberty - ("where there is no law there is no transgression"), moral pluralism, progress, individualism, and accountable government, while social liberalism focuses both on the illegitimacy of a tyrannical government that uses prerogative power and on the social conditions that make such tyrannical government possible.
Social liberalism versus neo-liberalismSocial liberalism (also known as New Liberalism) is very different from the ambiguous term neoliberalism, a name given to various proponents of the free markets and also to some conservative opponents of free markets, such as mercantilistic conservatives, in the late 20th century's global economy. Neoliberalism has been used to describe the liberal economic policies of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. As a body of thought, neoliberalism advocates positions contrary to many of those taken by social liberals, especially with regard to the former's commitments to free trade and dismantling of government "social" programs.
Social liberalism versus social democracyThe basic ideological difference between social liberalism and social democracy lies in the role of the State in relation to the individual.
Social liberals value liberty, rights and freedoms, and private property as fundamental to individual happiness, and regard democracy as an instrument to maintain a society where each individual enjoys the greatest amount of liberty possible (subject to the Harm Principle). Hence, democracy and parliamentarianism are mere political systems which legitimize themselves only through the amount of liberty they promote, and are not valued per se. While the State does have an important role in ensuring positive liberty, social liberals tend to trust that individuals are usually capable in deciding their own affairs, and generally do not need deliberate steering towards happiness.
Social democracy, on the other hand, has its roots in socialism, and (especially in democratic socialist forms) typically favours a more community-based view. While social democrats also value individual liberty, they do not believe that real liberty can be achieved for the majority without transforming the nature of the State itself. Having rejected the revolutionary approach of Marxism, and choosing to further their goals through the democratic process instead, social democrats nevertheless retain a strong skepticism for capitalism, which they believe needs to be regulated (or at least "managed") for the greater good. This focus on the greater good may, potentially, make social democrats more ready to step in and steer society in a direction that is deemed to be more equitable.
In practice, however, the differences between the two may be harder to perceive. This is especially the case nowadays as many social democratic parties have shifted towards the centre and adopted one version of Third Way politics or another.
Social liberal partiesSome parties which are arguably social liberal may include:
- Argentina: Radical Civic Union
- Australia: Australian Democrats, Australian Greens
- Austria: Social Liberals
- Belgium: Spirit
- Brazil: Social Liberal Party
- Canada: Liberal Party of Canada and its provincial affiliates
- Chile: Social Democrat Radical Party
- Colombia: Colombian Liberal Party
- Croatia: Croatian People's Party
- Denmark: Danish Social Liberal Party
- Estonia: Estonian Centre Party
- Finland: Swedish People's Party, Green League
- France: Left Radical Party, MoDem
- Italy: Action Party, Radicals of the Left, New Italian Socialist Party
- Japan: Democratic Party of Japan
- Lithuania: New Union (Social Liberals)
- Luxembourg: Democratic Party
- Moldova: Social Liberal Party
- Mozambique: Social Liberal and Democratic Party
- Netherlands: Democrats 66 , GroenLinks
- Norway: Venstre
- Poland: Democratic Party
- Portugal: Movimento Liberal Social
- Russia: Russian Democratic Party "Yabloko"
- Serbia: Liberal Democratic Party
- Slovenia: Liberal Democracy of Slovenia
- South Korea: United Democratic Party, Renewal of Korea Party
- Spain: Union, Progress and Democracy, Citizens-Party of the Citizenry
- Sudan: Sudan Liberal Party
- Sweden: Centre Party, Liberal People's Party
- Tunisia: Social Liberal Party
- United Kingdom: Liberal Democrats
- United States: Democratic Party (especially the Liberal factions)
Social liberal thinkers Some notable social liberal thinkers are:
Views of social liberals todayIn general, contemporary social liberals support:
- An economy consisting mainly of private enterprise, but with government owned or subsidized programs of education, healthcare, child care etc for all citizens.
- Regulatory bodies over private enterprise in the interests of workers, consumers and fair competition.
- Free trade. (not supporting a laissez-faire free market)
- A basic system of social security.
- A moderate level of taxation.
- Environmental protection laws (although not always to the extent advocated by Greens).
- Fairly open stances toward immigration and multiculturalism stemming from social liberal tendency to be civic nationalists (as opposed to ethnic nationalists).
- A secular and progressive social policy, including support for comprehensive sex education, gay and lesbian rights, universal health care, reproductive rights, abortion, stem cell research, abolition of capital punishment and (sometimes) euthanasia, while supporting gun control.
- A belief in the existence of victimless crimes (e.g. drug use and prostitution) and many social liberals call for the decriminalization or outright legalization of these practices.
- Decentralized decision-making.
- Internationalism. (Oppose extreme and aggressive nationalism)
- (In Europe) A federal European Union.
- A foreign policy supporting the promotion of democracy, the protection of human rights and where possible, effective multilateralism.
- As well as human rights, social liberals also support social rights, civil rights and civil liberties.
Further reading on social liberalismSee also
|
| |
|
|