|
|
|
|
Tulunids
|
| |
|
| |
The Tulunids were the first independent dynasty in Islamic Egypt (868–905 AD), when they broke away from the central authority of the Abbasid dynasty that ruled the Islamic Caliphate during that time. In the 9th century, internal conflict amongst the Abbasids meant that control of the outlying areas of the empire was increasingly tenuous, and in 868 the Turkish officer Ahmad ibn Tulun established himself as an independent governor of Egypt.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Tulunids' Start a new discussion about 'Tulunids' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
The Tulunids were the first independent dynasty in Islamic Egypt (868–905 AD), when they broke away from the central authority of the Abbasid dynasty that ruled the Islamic Caliphate during that time. In the 9th century, internal conflict amongst the Abbasids meant that control of the outlying areas of the empire was increasingly tenuous, and in 868 the Turkish officer Ahmad ibn Tulun established himself as an independent governor of Egypt. He subsequently achieved nominal autonomy from the central Abbasids. During his reign (868–884) and those of his successors, the Tulunid domains were expanded to include Palestine and Syria, as well as small holdings in Asia Minor. Ahmad was succeeded by his son Khumarawayh, whose military and diplomatic achievements made him a major player in the Middle Eastern political stage. The Abbasids affirmed their recognition of the Tulunids as legitimate rulers, and the dynasty's status as vassals to the caliphate. After Khumarawayh's death, his successor emirs were ineffectual rulers, allowing their Turkish and black slave-soldiers to run the affairs of the state. In 905, the Tulunids were unable to resist an invasion by the Abbasid troops, who restored direct caliphal rule in Syria and Egypt.
The Tulunid period was marked by economic and administrative reforms alongside cultural ones. Ahmad ibn Tulun changed the taxation system and aligned himself with the merchant community. He also established the Tulunid army. The capital was moved from Fustat to al-Qatta'i, where the celebrated mosque of ibn Tulun was constructed.
History
The rise and fall of the Tulunids occurred against a backdrop of increasing regionalism in the Muslim world. The Abbasid caliphate was struggling with political disturbances and losing its aura of universal legitimacy. There had previously been Coptic and Alid-led movements in Egypt, without more than temporary and local success. There was also a struggle for power between the Turkish military command and the administration of Baghdad. Furthermore, there was a widening imperial financial crisis. All of these themes would recur during the Tulunid rule.
The internal politics of the Abbasid caliphate itself seem to have been unstable. In 870, Abu A?mad (b. al-Mutawakkil) al-Muwaffa? (d. 891) was summoned from exile in Mecca to re-establish Abbasid authority over southern Iraq. Quickly, however, he became the de facto ruler of the caliphate. As a result of this uncertainty, Ahmad Ibn Tulun could establish and expand his authority. Thus the Tulunids wielded regional power, largely unhindered by imperial will; as such, the Tulunids can be compared with other 9th-century dynasties of the Muslim world, including the Aghlabids and the Tahirids.
Ahmad ibn Tulun
Ahmad Ibn ?ulun was a member of the mostly Central Asian Turkish guard formed initially in Baghdad, then later settled in Samarra, upon its establishment as the seat of the caliphate by al-Mu'tasim. In 254/868, Ibn Tulun was sent to Egypt as resident governor by Bayakbak (d. 256/870), the representative of the Abbasid caliph al-Mu?tazz. Ibn Tulun promptly established a financial and military presence in the province of Egypt by establishing an independent Egyptian army and taking over the management of the Egyptian and Syrian treasuries. In 877, troops of the caliphate were sent against him, due to his insufficient payment of tribute. Ahmad ibn Tulun, however, maintained his power, and took Syria the following year.
His reign of more than ten years allowed him to leave behind a well-trained military, a stable economy and an experienced bureaucracy to oversee the state affairs. He appointed his son, ?h_umaramayh, as the heir.
With full autonomy, once the tax income no longer had to go to the Caliph in Baghdad, it was possible to develop irrigation works and build a navy, which greatly stimulated the local economy and trade. In 878, Palestine and Syria were occupied by the Tulunids, enabling them to defend Egypt against Abbasid attack.
Khumarawayh
Following his father’s death, ?h_umarawayh took control as the designated heir. The first challenge he faced was the invasion of Syria by armies sent by al-Muwaffa?as, the de facto ruler during the reign of caliph al-Mu?tamid. ?h_umarawayh also had to deal with the defection of Ahmad b. Muhammad al-Wasi?i to the invaders' camps, a long-time and key ally of his father's.
The young Tulunid achieved political and military gains, enabling him to extend his authority from Egypt into northern Iraq, and as far north as Tarsus by 890. Being now a prominent player in the Near Eastern political stage, he negotiated two treaties with the Abbasids. In the first treaty in 886, al-Muwaffakin recognized Tulunid authority over Egypt and the regions of Syria for a thirty-year period. The second treaty, reached with al-Mu?tadid in 892, confirmed the terms of the earlier accord. Both treaties also sought to confirm the status of the Tulunid governor as a vassal of the caliphal family seated in Baghdad.
Despite his gains, ?h_umarawayh's reign also set the stage for the demise of the dynasty. Financial exhaustion, political infighting and strides by the ?Abbasids would all contribute the ruin of the Tulunids. ?h_umarawayh was also totally reliant on his Turkish and sub-Saharan soldiers. Under the administration of Khumarawayh, the Syro-Egyptian state's finances and military were destabilized.
Demise
The later emirs of the dynasty were all ineffectual rulers, relying on their Turkish and black soldiers to run the affairs of the state.
Khumarawayh's son Abu l-Ashir (also known as J_ays_h)_ was deposed by the ?ulunid military command in 896 AD, shortly after coming to power. He was succeeded by his brother, Harun. Though the brother would rule for eight years, he was unable to revitalize the dynasty. He was assassinated in 905. Harun's successor, S_h_ayban b . A?mad b. ?ulun was unable to resist an Abbasid invasion under the command of Mu?ammad b. Sulayman, with naval support from frontier forces based in Tarsus. This brought an end to his reign and that of the ?ulunids.
Culture
Ahmad ibn Tulun founded his own capital, al-Qatta'i, north of the previous capital Fustat, where he seated his government. One of the dominant features of this city, and indeed the feature that survives today, was the Mosque of Ibn Tulun. The mosque is built in a Samarran style that was common in the period during which the caliphate had shifted capitals from Baghdad to Samarra. This style of architecture was not just confined to religious buildings, but secular ones also. Surviving houses of the Tulunid period have Samarran-style stucco panels.
?h_umarawayh's reign exceeded his father's in spending. He built luxuriant palaces and gardens for himself and those he favored. To the Tulunid Egyptians, his "marvelous" blue-eyed palace lion exemplified his prodigality. His stables were so extensive that, according to popular lore, ?h_umarawayh never rode a horse more than once. Though he squandered the dynastic wealth, he also encouraged a rich cultural life with patronage of scholarship and poetry. His protégé and the teacher of his sons was the famed grammarian Mu?ammad b. ?Abd Allah b. Mu?ammad Muslim (d. 944). An encomium was written by ?asim b . Ya?ya al-Maryami (d. 317/929)to celebrate ?h_umarawayh's triumphs on the battlefield.
Through the mediation of his closest adviser, al-?usayn Ibn al-?j_a??a? al-?j_awhari, ?h_umarawayh arranged for one of the great political marriages of medieval Islamic history. He proposed his daughter's marriage to a member of the caliphal family in Baghdad. The marriage between the Tulunid princess ?a?r al-Nada with the Abbasid caliph al-Mu'tadid took place in 892. The exorbitant marriage included an awesome dowry estimated at between 400,000 and one million dinars. Some speculate that the splendours of the wedding were a calculated attempt by the Abbasids to ruin the Tulunids. The tale of the splendid nuptials of ?a?r al-Nada lived on in the memory of the Egyptian people well into the Ottoman period, and were recorded in the chronicles and the folk-literature. The marriage's importance arises from its exceptional nature: the phenomenon of marriage between royal families is rare in Islamic history. The concept of dowry given by the bride's family has also been absent in Islamic marriages, where mahr, or bride price has been the custom.
Military
During his reign, Ibn Tulun created an Tulunid army and navy. The need for the establishment of an autonomous armed force became apparent after the revolt of ?Isa b. al-S_h_ayk_h, governor of Palestine, in 870. In response, Ibn Tulun organized an army composed of Sudanese and Greek slave-soldiers. Other reports indicate the soldiers may have been Persians and Sudanese. ?h_umarawayh continued his father's policy of having a multi-ethnic army. His military prowess, in fact, was strengthened by his multi-ethnic regiments of black Sudanese soldiers, Greek mercenaries and fresh Turkish troops from Turkestan.
Ibn Tulun founded an élite guard to surround the Tulunid family. These formed the core of the Tulunid army, around which other larger regiments were built. These troops are said to have been from the region of G_h_ur in Afghanistan, during Ibn Tulun's reign, and from local Arabs during the reign of ?h_umarawayh. In a ceremony held in 871, Ibn Tulun had his forces swear personal allegiance to him. Nevertheless, there were defections from the Tulunid army, most notably of the high-ranking commander Lu?lu? in 883 to the Abbasids. Throughout its life the army faced such persistent problems of securing allegiance.
?h_umarawayh also established an elite corps called al-muk_h_tara. The corps was composed of unruly bedouins of the eastern Nile delta. By bestowing privileges upon the tribesmen, and converting them into an efficient and loyal bodyguard, he brought peace to the region between Egypt and Syria. He also re-asserted his control over this strategic region. The regiment also included one thousand Sudanese natives.
A list of military engagements in which the Tulunid army constituted a significant party is as follows:
- In 877, the Tulunid troops, after displaying their strength, forced the Abbasid army under Musa b. Bug_h_a to abandon his plan to depose Ahmad ibn Tulun.
- In 878, the Tulunids, under the pretext of a jihad to defend the frontiers of Asia Minor against the Byzantines, occupied Syria. This campaign was ended prematurely, as Ibn Tulun had to return to Egypt.
- In 885, the Tulunid army lead by Khumarawayh met the invading Abbasids at the Battle of the Mills (al-?awa?in) in southern Palestine. The Abbasids led by A?mad b. al-Muwaffa? had invaded Syria, and the governor of Damascus had defected to the enemy. After both Ahmad and Khumarawayh fled the battlefield, the ?ulunid general Sa?d al-Aysar secured victory.
- From 885 - 886, the Tulunid forces, lead by Khumarawayh, defeated Ibn Kundad_j, though the latter had superior numbers. A domino effect followed, as the Jazira, Cilicia and regions as far east as Haran submitted to the Tulunid army. Peace treaties with the Tulunids put an end to the military campaigns.
- From 896 to 905, after the emirate's demise the Tulunids were unable to stop the Abbasids from taking their capital al-Qatta'i.
Economy
During the reign of Ahmad ibn Tulun, the Egyptian economy remained prosperous. There were propitious levels of agricultural production, stimulated by consistent high flooding of the Nile. Other industries, particularly textiles, also thrived. In his administration, ibn Tulun asserted his autonomy, refusing to pay taxes to the central Abbasid government in Baghdad. He also reformed the administration, aligning himself with the merchant community, and changing the taxation system. Under the Tulunids, there were also repairs in the agricultural infrastructure. The key sector of production, investment, and participation in their Mediterranean-wide commerce, was textiles, linen in particular (Frantz, 281-5).
Financial autonomy
During the period of 870-872, ibn Tulun asserted more control over Egypt's financial administration. In 871, he took control of the kharaj taxes as well as the t_h_ug_h_ur from Syria. He also achieved victory over ibn al-Mudabbir, the head of the finance office and member of the Abbasid bureaucratic élite.
The de facto ruler of the Abbasid caliphate, al-Muwaffak, took issue with ibn Tulun's financial activities. He wanted to secure Egyptian revenue for his campaign against the Zanj rebellion (and perhaps limit the autonomy of the Tulunids). This pressing need for funds drew the attention of Baghdad to the considerably more wealthy Egypt. The situation came to a head in 877, when al-Muwaffak, upon not receiving the demanded funds, sent an army to depose Ahmad ibn Tulun. Nevertheless, on at least two occasions, ibn Tulun remitted considerable sums of revenue, along with gifts, to the central Abbasid administration.
Under Ahmad's son, Khumarawayh, the Abbasids formally entered into a treaty with the Tulunids, thereby ending hostilities and resuming the payment of tribute. Financial provisions were made in the first treaty in 886 with al-Muwaffak. A second treaty with al-Mu?ta?id, the son of al-Muwaffak, in 892, re-affirmed the political terms of the first. Financially, the Tulunids were to pay 300,000 dinars (though this figure may be inaccurate) annually.
Tulunid administration
The Tulunid administration over Egypt bore several notable features. The style of rule was highly centralized and "pitiless" in its execution. The administration was also backed by Egypt’s commercial, religious and social élite. Ahmad ibn Tulun replaced Iraqi officials with an Egyptian bureaucracy. Overall, the administration relied on relied on the powerful merchant community for both financial and diplomatic support. For example Ma?mar al-?j_awhari, a leading member of the merchant community in Egypt, served as ibn ?ulun’s financier.
The Tulunid administration also helped the economy prosper, by maintaining political stability, which in Egypt is a sine qua non. Isolated revolts among the Copts and some Arab nomads in upper Egypt, which never threatened the dynasty's power, were actually a response to the more efficient Tulunid fiscal practices. The economy was strengthened by reforms introduced both immediately before the Tulunids and during their reign. There were changes in the system of assessing and collecting taxes assessment and collection system. There was also an expansion in the use of tax-contracts, which were the source of an emergent land-holding élite in this period. Ahmad ibn Tulun's agrarian and administrative reforms resulted in encouraging peasants to work their lands with zeal, despite the heavy taxes. He also terminated the exactions of the administration officers for their personal profit.
One final feature of the administration under ibn ?ulun was the discontinued practice of draining off the majority of his revenue to the metropolis. Instead, he initiated building programs to benefit other parts of Egypt. He also used those funds to stimulate commerce and industry.
Large expenditures
?h_umarawayh inherited a stable economy and a wealthy polity from his father. The treasury was worth ten million dinars at the young Tulunid's succession. When ?h_umarawayh was killed in 896, the treasury was empty, and the dinar had sunk to one-third its value. Part of this financial disaster is attributed to his addiction to luxury, while squandering wealth to win loyalty was also another cause.
?h_umarawayh, unlike his father, spent lavishly. For example, he gifted to his daughter, ?a?r al-Nada, an extraordinary dowry of 400,000 - 1,000,000 dinars, for her wedding in 892 to the Abbasid al-Mu?ta?id. This move is speculated by some scholars to have been an attempt by the Abbasid to drain the Tulunid treasury.
See also
Neighboring states
Tulunid emirs
|
| |
|
|
