|
|
|
|
Sauropsida
|
| |
|
| |
Sauropsida ("lizard-face") is a group of amniotes that includes reptiles, dinosaurs, and birds. Among amniotes, sauropsida is distinguished from theropsida ("beast-face"), also called synapsids.
term "Sauropsida" ("lizard faces") was first coined in 1916 by E.S. Goodrich to include lizards, birds, and their relatives and distinguish them from mammals and their extinct relatives, which he included in the sister group Theropsida (now usually replaced with the name Synapsida).

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Sauropsida'
Start a new discussion about 'Sauropsida'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Sauropsida ("lizard-face") is a group of amniotes that includes reptiles, dinosaurs, and birds. Among amniotes, sauropsida is distinguished from theropsida ("beast-face"), also called synapsids.
History of classification
The term "Sauropsida" ("lizard faces") was first coined in 1916 by E.S. Goodrich to include lizards, birds, and their relatives and distinguish them from mammals and their extinct relatives, which he included in the sister group Theropsida (now usually replaced with the name Synapsida). Goodrich supported this division by the nature of the hearts and blood vessels in each group, and other features such as the structure of the forebrain. According to Goodrich, both lineages evolved from an earlier stem group, the Protosauria ("first lizards") which included some Paleozoic amphibians as well as early "reptiles" not recognized as true sauropsids.
Mammal-like reptiles and other reptiles
In 1956 D.M.S. Watson observed that the sauropsids and synapsids diverged from each other very early in their history, and so he divided Goodrich's Protosauria among the two groups. He also reinterpreted the Sauropsida and Theropsida to exclude birds and mammals respectively. Thus his Sauropsida included Procolophonia, Eosuchia, Millerosauria, Chelonia (turtles), Squamata (lizards and snakes), Rhynchocephalia, Crocodilia, "thecodonts" (paraphyletic basal Archosauria), non-avian dinosaurs, pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, and sauropyterygians.
This classification supplemented, but was never as popular as, the classification of the reptiles (according to Romer's classic Vertebrate Paleontology) into four subclasses according to the positioning of temporal fenestrae, openings in the sides of the skull behind the eyes. Those divisions were:
- Anapsida – no fenestrae
- Synapsida – one low fenestra (no longer considered true reptiles)
- Euryapsida – one high fenestra (now included within Diapsida)
- Diapsida – two fenestrae
Since the advent of phylogenetic nomenclature, the term Reptilia has fallen out of favor with many taxonomists, who have used Sauropsida in its place to include a monophyletic group containing the traditional reptiles and birds. Some taxonomists, such as Benton (2004), have co-opted the term to fit into traditional rank-based classifications, making Sauropsida and Synapsida class--level taxa to replace the traditional class Reptilia.
Rarareptilia
A twist on this scheme is the position of the turtles. Depending on author, turtles or synapsids may be the sister group of the rest of the amniots. In this scheme, the content of the group Sauropsida is somewhat different. The Turtles are classed as Parareptilia (usually given the rank of class), the mammals and the mammal-like reptiles are classed as Synapsida and the Sauropsida is left with the tuatara, squamata, crocodiles and birds.
This system leaves the basic question unanswered: In what group do the earliest reptiles go? One solution would be to include them in Sauropsida, which would then leave Sauropsida paraphyletic, just like Reptilia. Another solution would be to leave them out of Sauropsida as "basal amniotes". These early amniots undoubly falling under the term "reptile" as in the old physiological definitions, Sauropsida would then end up not containing all non-synapsid (and possibly non-parareptlian) reptiles, but rather a subset, leaving the old anapsids undefined.
Phylogeny
The cladogram presented here illustrates the "family tree" of sauropsids, and follows a simplified version of the relationships found by Laurin and Gauthier (1996), presented as part of the Tree of Life Web Project.
|
| |
|
|