|
|
|
|
Helical scan
|
| |
|
| |
Helical scan is a method of recording high bandwidth signals onto magnetic tape.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Helical scan' Start a new discussion about 'Helical scan' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
Helical scan is a method of recording high bandwidth signals onto magnetic tape. It is used in video tape recorders, video cassette recorders, digital audio tape recorders, and some computer tape drives.
Comparison to linear tape recording
In a fixed head system, tape is drawn past the head at a constant speed. The head creates a fluctuating magnetic field in response to the signal to be recorded, and the magnetic particles on the tape are forced to line up with the field at the head. As the tape moves away, the magnetic particles carry an imprint of the signal in their magnetic orientation. If the tape moves too slowly, a high frequency signal will not be imprinted — the particles' polarity will simply oscillate in the vicinity of the head, to be left in a random position. Thus the bandwidth capacity of the recorded signal can be seen to be related to tape speed — the faster the speed, the higher the frequency that can be recorded.
Video and digital audio need considerably more bandwidth than analog audio, so much so that tape would have to be drawn past the heads at very high speed in order to capture this signal. Clearly this is impractical, since tapes of immense length would be required. (However, see VERA for details of a partially-successful linear videotape system.) The generally adopted solution is to rotate the head against the tape at high speed, so that the relative velocity is high, but the tape itself moves at a slow speed. To accomplish this, the head must be tilted so that at each rotation of the head, a new area of tape is brought into play; each segment of the signal is recorded as a diagonal stripe across the tape. This is known as a helical scan because the tape wraps around the circular drum at an angle, traveling up like a helix.
Practical problems
There were a number of practical problems to be overcome with this system. The high tape/head speed could lead to rapid wear of both the tape and the head, so both need to be polished extremely smooth, and the head made of a hard wearing material. In addition, most systems operate with an air bearing separating the heads from the surface of the tape. Supplying signals to a rotating head is also problematic — this is usually accomplished by coupling the signal(s) inductively through a rotary transformer as shown in the third photograph. The transport mechanism is also much more complex than a fixed head system, since, during loading, the tape must be pulled around a rotating drum containing the head(s) so that a complete stripe can be recorded on each revolution. In a VCR for example, the tape must be pulled right out of the cassette case and threaded around the drum, and between the capstan and pinch roller. This leads to complex and potentially unreliable mechanics.
Transport systems
Two transport systems evolved in the early video machines, known as the alpha wrap and the omega wrap. In the alpha wrap machines the tape was wrapped around the head drum for a full 360 degrees (the tape looking like the Greek letter alpha). There was only one head which wrote a complete stripe for every revolution of the head. This system had problems when the head transited from one piece of tape to the next giving a large signal gap between fields. The machine had to fill this gap with the frame synchronizing pulses. Such machines were constrained to using guard band recoding (see below).
In the omega wrap machines, the tape was only wrapped around the head for 180 degrees. Two video heads were required, each writing alternate fields. This system had a much smaller signal gap between fields, but the frame synchronizing pulses were able to be recorded on the tape. Cassette based systems could only utilize the omega wrap technique, since it was geometrically impossible for an automatic loading system to introduce a loop into the tape. Early omega wrap systems utilized guard band recording, but the presence of two heads permitted the development of the slant azimuth technique. Later developments used increasing numbers of heads to record video using smaller drums and for recording HiFi sound as well.
Slant azimuth recording
Every videotape system attempts to pack as much video as possible onto a given-sized tape, but information from one recording stripe (pass of the video head) must not interfere with information on adjacent stripes. One method to provide isolation between the stripes is the use of guard bands (unrecorded areas between the stripes), but this wastes valuable tape space. All the early reel-to-reel machines and the first cassette formats, the Philips VCR and the Sony U-matic used this system.
Later helical scanning recorders instead usually use a method called slant azimuth recording, also called Symmetric Phase Recording. The head drum usually contains two heads with the magnetic gap of one head slanted slightly leftwards and the magnetic gap of the other head slanted slightly rightwards. (The slant of a magnetic head is referred to as its azimuth adjustment). Because of the alternating slants, each head will not strongly read the signal recorded by the other head and the stripes can be recorded immediately next to each other, alternating between left slant on one television field and right slant on the next television field. (In practice, it's not uncommon for the recorded stripes to overlap somewhat). Later machines including the JVC VHS and the Sony Betamax used slant azimuth recording as well as all later machines and their digital derivatives.
Using slant azimuth recording, the need for guard bands is completely eliminated, allowing more recording to be placed on a given length of tape.
Contrast with quadruplex recording
Helical scanning was a logical progression beyond an earlier system (pioneered by Ampex) known as quadruplex recording, also referred to as transverse recording. In this scheme, the rotating head drum ran essentially perpendicular to a 2 inch wide tape and the slices recorded across the tape were nearly perpendicular to the tape's motion. U.S. quadruplex systems revolved the head drum at 14,400 revolutions per minute (240 revolutions per second) with four heads on the drum so that each television field was broken into sixteen stripes on the tape (which required appropriately complex head-switching logic). By comparison, the longer stripe recorded by a helical scan recorder usually contains an entire TV field and the two-headed head drum spins at the frame rate (half the field rate) of the TV system in use.
|
| |
|
|
