|
|
|
|
Anas
|
| |
|
| |
Anas is a genus of dabbling ducks. It includes mallards, wigeons, teals, pintails and shovelers in a number of subgenera. Some authorities prefer to elevate the subgenera to genus rank. Indeed, as the moa-nalos are very close to this clade and may have evolved later than some of these lineages, it is rather the absence of a thorough review than lack of necessity that this genus is rather over-lumped.
phylogeny of this genus is one of the most confounded ones of all living birds.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Anas'
Start a new discussion about 'Anas'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Anas is a genus of dabbling ducks. It includes mallards, wigeons, teals, pintails and shovelers in a number of subgenera. Some authorities prefer to elevate the subgenera to genus rank. Indeed, as the moa-nalos are very close to this clade and may have evolved later than some of these lineages, it is rather the absence of a thorough review than lack of necessity that this genus is rather over-lumped.
Systematics
.The phylogeny of this genus is one of the most confounded ones of all living birds. Research is hampered by the fact the radiation of the two major groups of Anas - the teals and mallard groups -; took place in a very short time and fairly recently, roughly in the mid-late Pleistocene. Furthermore, hybridization probably has long played a major role in Anas evolution, with within-subgenus hybrids regularly and between-subgenus hybrids not infrequently being fully fertile see also Mariana Mallard. The relationships between species are much obscured by this fact, and mtDNA sequence data is of dubious value in resolving their relationships; on the other hand, nuclear DNA sequences evolve too slowly to resolve the phylogeny of the subgenus Anas for example.
Some major clades can be discerned. For example, that the traditional subgenus Anas, the mallard group, forms a monophyletic (in the loose sense, i.e. non-holophyletic) group has never been seriously questioned by modern science and is as good as confirmed (but see below). On the other hand, the phylogeny of the teals is very confusing.
It is fairly clear by now that the dabbling duck lineages more distantly related to mallard group (which includes the type species of Anas) than the wigeons are should arguably be separated in their own genera. These would include the Baikal Teal, the Garganey, the spotted black-capped Punanetta group, and the shovelers and other blue-winged species. Whether the widgeons, which are very distinct in morphology and behavior, but much less so in mtDNA cytochrome b and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 sequences, should also be considered a distinct genus Mareca (including the Gadwall and Falcated Duck) is essentially the one remaining point of dispute as regards the question which taxa should remain in this genus and which ones should not.
Species
The following arrangement is based on morphological, molecular and behavioral characters and presents apparent major evolutionary groupings compared to the subgenera the species were placed in at one time or another.
Probable genus Sibirionetta - Baikal Teal
Probable genus Querquedula - Garganey (may include Punanetta)
Probable genus Punanetta
Probable genus Spatula - blue-winged ducks/shovelers and allies (polyphyletic?)
Possible genus Mareca - wigeons (may include Chaulelasmus and Eunetta)
Subgenus Chaulelasmus - Gadwall
- Gadwall, Anas strepera
- Coues' Gadwall or Washington Island Gadwall, Anas strepera couesi - extinct (late 19th century)
Subgenus Eunetta - Falcated Duck
Subgenus Dafila - pintails
- Northern Pintail, Anas acuta
- Eaton's Pintail, Anas eatoni
- Kerguelen Islands Pintail, Anas eatoni eatoni
- Crozet Islands Pintail, Anas eatoni drygalskii
- Yellow-billed Pintail, Anas georgica
- South Georgia Pintail, Anas georgica georgica** Niceforo's Pintail, Anas georgica niceforoi - extinct (1950s)
- White-cheeked Pintail, Anas bahamensis (formerly Poecilonetta)
- Red-billed Teal, Anas erythrorhyncha (formerly Poecilonetta)
- Cape Teal, Anas capensis (formerly in Nettion)
Subgenus Nettion - teals (paraphyletic)
- Atlantic/Red-and-green head clade
- New Zealand clade (Placement unresolved)
Subgenus Melananas - African Black Duck
Subgenus Anas - mallard and relatives (may include Melananas)
- Basal African species ("Afranas")
- American clade
- Mottled Duck, Anas fulvigula - sometimes included in Anas platyrhynchos
- Florida Duck, Anas fulvigula fulvigula - sometimes included in Anas platyrhynchos
- American Black Duck, Anas rubripes - sometimes included in Anas platyrhynchos
- Mexican Duck, Anas diazi - sometimes included in Anas platyrhynchos
- Pacific clade - the moa-nalos might be derived from this group.
- Mariana Mallard, Anas (platyrhynchos) oustaleti - sometimes considered a subspecies of Anas superciliosa; extinct (1981)
- Hawaiian Duck, Anas wyvilliana - sometimes included in Anas platyrhynchos
- Philippine Duck, Anas luzonica
- Laysan Duck, Anas laysanensis - sometimes included in Anas platyrhynchos
- Lisianski Duck, Anas cf. laysanensis - hypothetical; extinct (c.1845)
- Pacific Black Duck, Anas superciliosa
- Ambiguous
- Mallard, Anas platyrhynchos
- Spotbill, Anas poecilorhyncha
- Chinese Spotbill, Anas (poecilorhyncha) zonorhyncha - sometimes considered a subspecies of Anas superciliosa
Formerly placed in Anas:
Speculanas specularisCrested Duck, Lophonetta specularioidesSalvadori's Teal, Salvadorina waigiuensis
Fossil record
A number of fossil species of Anas have been described. Their relationships are often undetermined:
Anas sp. (Late Miocene of China) Anas sp. (Late Miocene of Rudabánya, Hungary) Anas greeni (Ash Hollow Late Miocene?/Early Pliocene of South Dakota, USA) - Nettion red-and-green head clade (doubtful)? Anas ogallalae (Ogalalla Late Miocene?/Early Pliocene of Kansas, USA) - Nettion red-and-green head clade (doubtful)? Anas pullulans (Juntura Late Miocene?/Early Pliocene of Juntura, Malheur County, Oregon, USA) - Punanetta? Anas cheuen (Early-Middle Pleistocene of Argentina) - Dafila? Anas bunkeri (Early -? Middle Pliocene - Early Pleistocene of WC USA) - Nettion red-and-green head clade?Bermuda Islands Flightless Duck Anas pachyscelus (Shore Hills Late Pleistocene of Bermuda, W Atlantic) Anas schneideri (Late Pleistocene of Little Box Elder Cave, USA)
Several prehistoric waterfowl supposedly part of the Anas assemblage are nowadays not placed in this genus anymore, at least not with certainty:
"Anas" basaltica (Late Oligocene of "Warnsdorf", Czechia) is apparently an indeterminate heron. "Anas" blanchardi, "A." consobrina, "A." natator are now in Mionetta "Anas" creccoides (Early-mid Oligocene of Belgium), "A." risgoviensis (Late Miocene of Bavaria, Germany) and "A." skalicensis (Early Miocene of "Skalitz", Czechia), though possibly anseriform, cannot be placed with any certainty among modern birds at all. "Anas" albae (Late Miocene of Polgárdi, Hungary), "A." eppelsheimensis (Early Pliocene of Eppelsheim, Germany), "A." isarensis (Late Miocene of Aumeister, Germany) and "A." luederitzensis (Kalahari Early Miocene of Lüderitzbucht, Namibia) are apparently Anatidae of unclear affiliations; the first might be a seaduck. "Anas" integra and "A." oligocaena are now in Dendrochen "Anas" robusta is now tentatively placed in Anserobranta "Anas" velox (Middle - Late? Miocene of C Europe) and "A." meyerii (Middle Miocene of Öhningen, Germany; possibly the same species) do not seem to belong into the present genus either; they may still turn out to be ancestral dabbling ducks.
Highly problematic, albeit in a theoretical sense, is the placement of the moa-nalos. These are in all probability derived from a common ancestor of the Pacific Black Duck, the Laysan Duck, and the Mallard, and an unknown amount of other lineages. Phylogenetically, they may even form a clade within the traditional genus Anas. However, as opposed to these species - which are well representative of dabbling ducks in general - the moa-nalos are the most radical departure from the anseriform bauplan known to science. This illustrates that in a truly evolutionary sense, a strictly phylogenetic taxonomy may be difficult to apply.
Footnotes
|
| |
|
|