|
|
|
|
New Philosophers
|
| |
|
| |
The New Philosophers (French nouveaux philosophes) is a term referring to French philosophers who broke with Marxism in the early 1970s. They include André Glucksmann, Alain Finkielkraut, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Jean-Marie Benoist, Christian Jambet, Guy Lardreau or Jean-Paul Dollé. They criticized post-structuralists, and Jean-Paul Sartre, as well as the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger.
term was forged by Bernard-Henri Lévy in 1976, who titled an issue of the weekly review Les Nouvelles Littéraires the "Nouveaux philosophes.".

Discussion
Ask a question about 'New Philosophers'
Start a new discussion about 'New Philosophers'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
The New Philosophers (French nouveaux philosophes) is a term referring to French philosophers who broke with Marxism in the early 1970s. They include André Glucksmann, Alain Finkielkraut, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Jean-Marie Benoist, Christian Jambet, Guy Lardreau or Jean-Paul Dollé. They criticized post-structuralists, and Jean-Paul Sartre, as well as the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger.
Origin
The term was forged by Bernard-Henri Lévy in 1976, who titled an issue of the weekly review Les Nouvelles Littéraires the "Nouveaux philosophes.". The issue included a number of articles and essays meant to introduce and create excitement about about young intellectuals including Lévy, Benoist, Michel Guérin, Jambet, and Lardreau.
Basic Characteristics
Most of the New Philosophers had a previous history of Maoism or other leftist activity, but had come into fierce opposition to Marxism. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's writings on The Gulag Archipelago and other crimes of the Soviet Union had a profound effect of disenchantment on these former leftists. The mark of the New Philosophers was to cast a general doubt on the tendency to argue from 'the left', by attributing too much inherent power-worship in the whole tradition, or at least what it borrowed from Hegel and Marx. (This challenged the [French] stereotype that an intellectual was necessarily a left-wing intellectual.) One of their most important concepts was that "Master Thinkers" like Marx and Rabelais had created the foundations for systems of oppresion. Glucksmann's book by the same name, Les Maîtres Penseurs, argued that knowledge, expertise, and philosophy form the core of domination. Their radical social critique extended so far as to implicate Reason itself as the origin of authoritarianism.
Major influences
The writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn were an inspiration for the New Philosophers. Other important influences include Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan.
Style
The New Philosophers had extensive media coverage in France, Italy, and other countries. They appeared on television and in nonacademic magazines including Lui, Paris-Match, and Playboy, giving them popular recognition in France and abroad.
Criticisms of the New Philosophers
The New Philosophers as a group were hard to characterize, as one might expect from their indeterminate name. The fact that their identity was based on a negative quality (i.e., rejecting Marxism and other systems of authoritarian power) meant that they were very disparate. In 1978, Michael Ryan wrote that "The 'new philosophers' could be said to exist in name only. The homogeneity of the movement rests on a mutual espousal of heterogeneity." Another similar criticism levels the charge that the New Philosophers are "a brand name... an extremely heterogeneous group of about ten intellectuals who are held together more from without than from within... they do not serve as representatives of any clearly defined political movement or force."
They were criticized as superficial and ideological by intellectuals such as Gilles Deleuze (who called them "TV buffoons"), Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Jean-François Lyotard and Cornelius Castoriadis.
Other
Recently their criticism has found a new target in multiculturalism. Fiery polemic on the subject by proponents like Pascal Bruckner and Paul Cliteur has kindled international debate.
Their sobriquet is possibly a reference to the philosophers of the future that Nietzsche anticipated in his work Beyond Good and Evil.
|
| |
|
|