Alan Knight (historian)
Encyclopedia
Alan Knight is Professor of History of Latin America
History of Latin America
Latin America refers to countries in the Americas where Romance languages are spoken. This definition, however, is not meant to include Canada, in spite of its large French-speaking population....

 academy at the University of Oxford
University of Oxford
The University of Oxford is a university located in Oxford, United Kingdom. It is the second-oldest surviving university in the world and the oldest in the English-speaking world. Although its exact date of foundation is unclear, there is evidence of teaching as far back as 1096...

, England
England
England is a country that is part of the United Kingdom. It shares land borders with Scotland to the north and Wales to the west; the Irish Sea is to the north west, the Celtic Sea to the south west, with the North Sea to the east and the English Channel to the south separating it from continental...

, where he is a Fellow at St. Antony's College and Director of the Latin American Centre. Knight is the author of the two-volume The Mexican Revolution (Cambridge 1986) for which he received the Albert Beveridge Prize
Beveridge Award
The Albert J. Beveridge Award was established in 1939 in memory of United States Senator Beveridge of Indiana, former secretary and longtime member of the American Historical Association , through a gift from his wife, Catherine Beveridge and donations from AHA members from his home state...

by the American Historical Association
American Historical Association
The American Historical Association is the oldest and largest society of historians and professors of history in the United States. Founded in 1884, the association promotes historical studies, the teaching of history, and the preservation of and access to historical materials...

  and the Bolton Prize
Herbert Eugene Bolton
Herbert Eugene Bolton was an American historian and one of the most prominent authorities on Spanish American history...

by the Conference on Latin American History. He is considered "an authority" on Mexico
Mexico
The United Mexican States , commonly known as Mexico , is a federal constitutional republic in North America. It is bordered on the north by the United States; on the south and west by the Pacific Ocean; on the southeast by Guatemala, Belize, and the Caribbean Sea; and on the east by the Gulf of...

.

Academic career


Before teaching at Oxford, Alan Knight taught at the University of Essex
University of Essex
The University of Essex is a British campus university whose original and largest campus is near the town of Colchester, England. Established in 1963 and receiving its Royal Charter in 1965...

 (1973–85) and the University of Texas at Austin
University of Texas at Austin
The University of Texas at Austin is a state research university located in Austin, Texas, USA, and is the flagship institution of the The University of Texas System. Founded in 1883, its campus is located approximately from the Texas State Capitol in Austin...

 (C.B. Smith Chair in History), and in 1986 was a visiting fellow at the Center for US-Mexican Studies at the University of California
University of California
The University of California is a public university system in the U.S. state of California. Under the California Master Plan for Higher Education, the University of California is a part of the state's three-tier public higher education system, which also includes the California State University...

, San Diego. At age 28, he graduated with a D. Phil. in History from the University of Oxford (1974). His doctoral dissertation was “Nationalism, xenophobia and revolution: the place of foreigners and foreign interests in Mexico, 1910-1915”.

Professor Knight is now the editor of the Cambridge Latin American Studies Series. Since 1985, he has been married to Lidia Lozano, translator and contributor of Latin American history.

Research and commentary

Knight states in his writing that his Oxford professors Michael Cherniavsky and Jack Gallagher pointed him toward “the attractions and opportunities of the path I eventually took, that of Latin American history.” (Knight 1986.I: xii). His work over the past 35 years started from the specific conflict of the Mexican Revolution and has developed into broader narrations: comparative landscapes (Mexico-Latin America, Mexico-Europe) and interregional comparatives of more recent events ("The Peculiarities of Mexican History: Mexico Compared to Latin America, 1821-1992" or "Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, especially Mexico"). Yet crises and state-building, agrarian societies and revolutions still provide the matrix for his historical analysis.

Empiricism and historiography

On one hand, "we (historians) can ... test a hypothesis by collecting data, framing a clear argument, and submitting it for consideration to experts in the field..." (Knight Subalterns: 154). Nevertheless Knight often avoids data values research and charts. His book Mexico: The Colonial Era has no charts, and The Mexican Revolution has only two in 1200 pages. He argues: "The aggressively numerate, in particular, may regret the relative absence of statistical material. This is deliberate: I share Chevalier's skepticism about much of the statistical evidence for this period, and E.P. Thompson's belief that, especially as regards of popular radicalism, the usefulness of statistical evidence is easily exaggerated" (Knight 1986.I: ix).

According to Alan Knight, historians need to be vigilant of those who believe the role of history is to test general theories of human behavior that demonstrate eternal truths. Good history is to be found somewhere between the paradigms of complete relativism and absolute-objective constructions as facts. In his words: "Fortunately, we do not have to choose between the pomo funny farm and the positivistic prison. There are plenty of green fields in between." (Knight Subalterns: 156)

Alan Knight is a critical post-revisionist. For Knight the revisionists camp has naturally aligned with contemporary currents of thought. "It has become fashionable to trash Marxism, to cavil at "economic reductionism", to cherish "individualism", to revere the market, to question the state's positive, arbitrating, and redistributionist role in society." (Knight Revisionism: 197) Knight ???says??? the revisionist historiography was a positive development to the post-revisionist generation: simplistic accounts based on class struggles or modes of production were discarded, revolutions became multi-causal as classes became fluid and complex, outcomes derived from sociopolitical forces, and structural transformations derived from revolutionary processes and not events.

Latin American historiography

Knight is critical of "the "new cultural history" that often repackages old and familiar forms of historiography in new neologistic wrapping" (Knight Subalterns: 138). Even worse, he argues that the "new cultural history" obsession with all human behavior as culture and the empowered agency of the oppressed, plus a preached political engagement that "turns people off", obscure semantics and jargon, all make the "new cultural history" paradoxical and ambiguous.

Historiographical methodology

On the genesis of social crises, Knight says that the perception of a problem as critical (the "emic" subjective assessment
Emic and etic
Emic and etic are terms used by anthropologists and by others in the social and behavioral sciences to refer to two kinds of data concerning human behavior...

) is as important as the critical problem itself (the "etic" objective assessment
Emic and etic
Emic and etic are terms used by anthropologists and by others in the social and behavioral sciences to refer to two kinds of data concerning human behavior...

). Very often crises and panics have marginal correlations to exterior events (millenarian movements, Red Scares in the U.S.), "and for a crisis to count as a crisis, such a subjective mood must be present" (Knight Historical: 33). Therefore, the degree of endogenous and exogenous causalities needs to be gauged. For Alan Knight, elite political history from the top-down is appropriate for times of stable and relative autonomy of power. A shift to endogenous causes is appropriate when dealing with social or political crises by examining the structural conditions of regimes (and its victims) to survive or perish.

Alan Knight concludes: "the more stable the elites, the more useful elite theory (or Namerite history); the more unstable the elite establishment, the more we should seek theoretical illumination elsewhere: in Hobbes, Marx, and the "new social history" (Knight Historical: 39).

Books

In addition to The Mexican Revolution (2 vols., Cambridge, 1986), Knight is the author of US-Mexican Relations, 1910-40 (San Diego, 1987), the 1930-1946 chapter on Mexico in The Cambridge History of Latin America (Vol. VII, 1990), The Mexican Petroleum Industry in the 20th Century (1992) and a three-volume general history of Mexico: Mexico, From the Beginning to the Spanish Conquest and Mexico, The Colonial Era (Cambridge, 2002). Volume 3 is yet to be published. Knight has also written numerous extended articles on 20th-century Mexico, related topics and theory. These articles are crucial in order to understand the historical context and debate of his work.
  • Nationalism, xenophobia and revolution: the place of foreigners and foreign interests in Mexico, 1910-1915. (Unpublished, 1974) 355 pp. University of Oxford Thesis (D.Phil.)
  • The Mexican Revolution, Volume I: Porfirians, Liberals, and Peasants, Volume II: Counter-Revolution and Reconstruction. (Cambridge, 1986). Albert Beveridge Prize (American Historical Association), Bolton Prize (Conference on Latin American History)
  • U.S.-Mexican Relations, 1910-1940: An Interpretation. (San Diego, 1987)
  • Latin America: what price the past? (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
  • The Mexican Petroleum Industry in the Twentieth Century, J.C. Brown and A. Knight eds., (Austin, 1992)
  • Mexico: From The Beginning to the Spanish Conquest. (Cambridge, 2002)
  • Mexico: The Colonial Era. (Cambridge, 2002) - Referenced as "Knight" in the text. -
  • Mexico: Since Independence. (in progress)
  • Cardenas and Cardenismo, 1934 to 1940. (in progress)

Articles

  • Subalterns, Signifiers, and Statistics: Perspectives on Mexican Historiography. Latin American Research Review Vol. 37, No. 2 (2002), pp. 136–158
  • Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies Vol. 30, No. 2 (May, 1998), pp. 223–248
  • Historical and Theoretical Considerations; Mexico and Latin America in Comparative Perspective in Elites, Crises and the Origins of Regimes, Mattei Dogan and John Higley eds. (Oxford, 1998)
  • Latin America in Routledge Companion to Historiography, Michael Bentley, ed. (London, 1997)
  • The Ideology of the Mexican Revolution, 1910-1940. Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe. Tel Aviv University. Vol. 8, No.1 (Jan-Jun 1997)
  • Latin America: political economy and geo-politics since 1945; in Oxford Development Studies Vol. 24 No. 2 June 1996
  • Latin America: What Price the Past? An Inaugural Lecture Delivered Before the University of Oxford on 18 November 1993 (Oxford), 1995.
  • Popular Culture and the Revolutionary State in Mexico, 1910-1940. The Hispanic American Historical Review Vol. 74, No. 3 (Aug., 1994), pp. 393–444
  • Cardenismo: Juggernaut or Jalopy? Journal of Latin American Studies Vol. 26, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 73–107
  • Revisionism and Revolution: Mexico Compared to England and France. Past and Present No. 134 (Feb., 1992), pp. 159–199
  • The Peculiarities of Mexican History: Mexico Compared to Latin America, 1821-1992 Journal of Latin American Studies Vol. 24, Quincentenary Supplement: The Colonial and Post Colonial Experience. Five Centuries of Spanish and Portuguese America (1992), pp. 99–144
  • Mexico, 1930–1946; in The Cambridge History of Latin America (Vol. VII, 1990)
  • Racism, Revolution, and Indigenismo in The Idea of Race in Latin America, 1870-1940 Richard Graham, ed. (Austin, 1990).
  • Mexican Peonage: What Was It and Why Was It? Journal of Latin American Studies Vol. 18, No. 1 (May, 1986), pp. 41–74
  • The Working Class and the Mexican Revolution, c. 1900-1920. Journal of Latin American Studies Vol. 16, No. 1 (May, 1984), pp. 51–79

External links


The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK