Place of the Relevant Intermediary Approach
Encyclopedia
The Place of the Relevant Intermediary Approach, or PRIMA, is a conflict of laws
rule applied to the proprietary aspects of security
transactions, especially collateral
transactions
. It is an alternative approach to the historically important look-through approach
, and was a in its earliest form the basis for the initial draft of the Hague Securities Convention
.http://hcch.e-vision.nl/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=72
Unlike the look-through approach, PRIMA does not look through the various tiers of intermediaries to the underlying securities. Rather, it stops at the level of the intermediary immediately above the parties to the pledge or transfer. Its important advantage is that it subjects an investor's interest in securities to the law of a single jurisdiction
, even where evidence of underlying securities is situated in many different countries, or where various issuers in a single portfolio is involved. This provides certainty and clarity for all parties involved.
It is a matter of debate whether PRIMA constitutes a development of the traditional lex rei sitae
principle or should be regarded as a new concept.
PRIMA was adopted in a number of jurisdiction
s as the conflict of laws rule to be applied to the proprietary aspects of collateral transactions. It has given way, with the Hague Securities Convention
, to the approach described below.
. Under Belgian law, the interest in respect of the underlying securities held by an investor and recorded on the books of its intermediary is treated as a different asset from the underlying securities. Thus the Belgian approach is an application of PRIMA, as well as being linked to the lex rei sitae tradition.
Such an approach causes problems in some legal systems, notable of which are those of Japan
and Germany
. Under both their systems, an investor would be treated as the direct owner of the underlying securities even though the security is held through tiers of intermediaries. The direct ownership in the underlying securities makes it difficult to argue that the location of the asset is at the level of an intermediary.
's Settlement Finality Directive of 1998 introduced PRIMA in all European Union member states. In Germany, where investors have direct ownership rights in underlying securities, implementing Art 9(2) into domestic law has severed the connection with the traditional lex rei sitae approach.
In 2002, the European Community passed the European Union's Collateral Directive, which is also based on a Type I application of PRIMA. Under Art 9, characterisation, perfection and other issues relating to the provisions of securities as collateral are governed by the law of the State where the securities account is maintained. The majority of member states have yet to implement this directive.
The European Commission in June 2006 indicated its desire to amend the European Union's Settlement Finality Directive and the European Collateral Directive so that those directives are consistent with the Hague Securities Convention.
On 23 June 2005, the European Council had asked the European Commission to assess and clarify four legal issues, namely: (1) scope of application, (2) extent of third-party rights, (3) consequences for substantive and public law; and (4) impact of the diversity of laws on settlement systems and prudential regimes. The assessment found that three of the issues pose no major difficulty, while on the fourth issue it cautioned that the use of more than one Convention law within securities settlement systems would endanger financial stability. The Commission therefore recommended that the European Community and Member States now sign the Convention, and that the Settlement Finality Directive be amended so that securities settlement systems are governed by one Convention law only.
Switzerland has now signed the Convention.
, a different solution has been adopted. Under Art 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the applicable law is not determined by reference to the location of the asset. Instead, parties to the relevant account agreement are able to choose the applicable law. This solution, no longer linked to the lex rei sitae, is not a PRIMA solution, since it does not focus on the place of the intermediary at all—but rather on the law chosen by the intermediary and its client (which may bear no relation whatsoever to the place of the intermediary).
The fundamental issue during negotiations was to determine a test that would accurately locate the one jurisdiction for any set of circumstances that would be the jurisdiction whose law would apply. The result of the analysis was that for financial institutions with many offices, it is often not possible to point to one particular location. Delegates concluded that a test that tried to actually locate a particular securities account would result in an unacceptable level of impossibility or uncertainty.
Over time a new approach was developed:
the account holder and relevant intermediary may choose in the account agreement the law to govern the issues under the Convention;
this choice will be respected under the Hague Convention provided that the chosen law is of a place where the relevant intermediary has an office that is involved in the maintenance of securities accounts (a "qualifying office").
Conflict of laws
Conflict of laws is a set of procedural rules that determines which legal system and which jurisdiction's applies to a given dispute...
rule applied to the proprietary aspects of security
Security (finance)
A security is generally a fungible, negotiable financial instrument representing financial value. Securities are broadly categorized into:* debt securities ,* equity securities, e.g., common stocks; and,...
transactions, especially collateral
Collateral (finance)
In lending agreements, collateral is a borrower's pledge of specific property to a lender, to secure repayment of a loan.The collateral serves as protection for a lender against a borrower's default - that is, any borrower failing to pay the principal and interest under the terms of a loan obligation...
transactions
Financial transaction
A financial transaction is an event or condition under the contract between a buyer and a seller to exchange an asset for payment. It involves a change in the status of the finances of two or more businesses or individuals.-History:...
. It is an alternative approach to the historically important look-through approach
Look-through approach
The look-through approach is a conflict of laws rule applied to the proprietary aspects of security transactions. It is an application of the traditional lex rei sitae test....
, and was a in its earliest form the basis for the initial draft of the Hague Securities Convention
Hague Securities Convention
The Convention on the law applicable to certain rights in respect of securities held with an intermediary, or Hague Securities Convention is an international multilateral treaty intended to remove, globally, legal uncertainties for cross-border securities transactions...
.http://hcch.e-vision.nl/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=72
Unlike the look-through approach, PRIMA does not look through the various tiers of intermediaries to the underlying securities. Rather, it stops at the level of the intermediary immediately above the parties to the pledge or transfer. Its important advantage is that it subjects an investor's interest in securities to the law of a single jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is the practical authority granted to a formally constituted legal body or to a political leader to deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a defined area of responsibility...
, even where evidence of underlying securities is situated in many different countries, or where various issuers in a single portfolio is involved. This provides certainty and clarity for all parties involved.
It is a matter of debate whether PRIMA constitutes a development of the traditional lex rei sitae
Lex rei sitae
Lex rei sitae is a legal doctrine of property law and of International private law. It is Latin for "the law where the property is situated". The law governing the transfer of title to property is dependent upon, and varies with, the lex rei sitae....
principle or should be regarded as a new concept.
PRIMA was adopted in a number of jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction is the practical authority granted to a formally constituted legal body or to a political leader to deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a defined area of responsibility...
s as the conflict of laws rule to be applied to the proprietary aspects of collateral transactions. It has given way, with the Hague Securities Convention
Hague Securities Convention
The Convention on the law applicable to certain rights in respect of securities held with an intermediary, or Hague Securities Convention is an international multilateral treaty intended to remove, globally, legal uncertainties for cross-border securities transactions...
, to the approach described below.
Type I PRIMA
The so-called Type I PRIMA dates back to the late 1960s, in BelgiumBelgium
Belgium , officially the Kingdom of Belgium, is a federal state in Western Europe. It is a founding member of the European Union and hosts the EU's headquarters, and those of several other major international organisations such as NATO.Belgium is also a member of, or affiliated to, many...
. Under Belgian law, the interest in respect of the underlying securities held by an investor and recorded on the books of its intermediary is treated as a different asset from the underlying securities. Thus the Belgian approach is an application of PRIMA, as well as being linked to the lex rei sitae tradition.
Such an approach causes problems in some legal systems, notable of which are those of Japan
Japan
Japan is an island nation in East Asia. Located in the Pacific Ocean, it lies to the east of the Sea of Japan, China, North Korea, South Korea and Russia, stretching from the Sea of Okhotsk in the north to the East China Sea and Taiwan in the south...
and Germany
Germany
Germany , officially the Federal Republic of Germany , is a federal parliamentary republic in Europe. The country consists of 16 states while the capital and largest city is Berlin. Germany covers an area of 357,021 km2 and has a largely temperate seasonal climate...
. Under both their systems, an investor would be treated as the direct owner of the underlying securities even though the security is held through tiers of intermediaries. The direct ownership in the underlying securities makes it difficult to argue that the location of the asset is at the level of an intermediary.
Adoption in Europe; and Anticipated Changes
Article 9(2) of the European UnionEuropean Union
The European Union is an economic and political union of 27 independent member states which are located primarily in Europe. The EU traces its origins from the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Economic Community , formed by six countries in 1958...
's Settlement Finality Directive of 1998 introduced PRIMA in all European Union member states. In Germany, where investors have direct ownership rights in underlying securities, implementing Art 9(2) into domestic law has severed the connection with the traditional lex rei sitae approach.
In 2002, the European Community passed the European Union's Collateral Directive, which is also based on a Type I application of PRIMA. Under Art 9, characterisation, perfection and other issues relating to the provisions of securities as collateral are governed by the law of the State where the securities account is maintained. The majority of member states have yet to implement this directive.
The European Commission in June 2006 indicated its desire to amend the European Union's Settlement Finality Directive and the European Collateral Directive so that those directives are consistent with the Hague Securities Convention.
On 23 June 2005, the European Council had asked the European Commission to assess and clarify four legal issues, namely: (1) scope of application, (2) extent of third-party rights, (3) consequences for substantive and public law; and (4) impact of the diversity of laws on settlement systems and prudential regimes. The assessment found that three of the issues pose no major difficulty, while on the fourth issue it cautioned that the use of more than one Convention law within securities settlement systems would endanger financial stability. The Commission therefore recommended that the European Community and Member States now sign the Convention, and that the Settlement Finality Directive be amended so that securities settlement systems are governed by one Convention law only.
Switzerland has now signed the Convention.
Type II (a non-PRIMA approach)
In the United StatesUnited States
The United States of America is a federal constitutional republic comprising fifty states and a federal district...
, a different solution has been adopted. Under Art 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the applicable law is not determined by reference to the location of the asset. Instead, parties to the relevant account agreement are able to choose the applicable law. This solution, no longer linked to the lex rei sitae, is not a PRIMA solution, since it does not focus on the place of the intermediary at all—but rather on the law chosen by the intermediary and its client (which may bear no relation whatsoever to the place of the intermediary).
Formulating a Modern post-PRIMA Approach
The first Special Commission of the Convention met at The Hague in January 2001 to consider the appropriate conflict of laws rule. At this first meeting, initially the concept embraced by the PRIMA approach was adopted. The next two years of negotiations and meetings were spent determining an appropriate formulation of the language of the convention, and which PRIMA concepts to accept and which to reject. At the end of the negotiations, the idea that the place of the relevant intermediary was the place to focus on was unanimously rejected in lieu of the approach described below.The fundamental issue during negotiations was to determine a test that would accurately locate the one jurisdiction for any set of circumstances that would be the jurisdiction whose law would apply. The result of the analysis was that for financial institutions with many offices, it is often not possible to point to one particular location. Delegates concluded that a test that tried to actually locate a particular securities account would result in an unacceptable level of impossibility or uncertainty.
Over time a new approach was developed:
the account holder and relevant intermediary may choose in the account agreement the law to govern the issues under the Convention;
this choice will be respected under the Hague Convention provided that the chosen law is of a place where the relevant intermediary has an office that is involved in the maintenance of securities accounts (a "qualifying office").