Mitigation banking
Encyclopedia
Mitigation banking is the restoration, creation, enhancement, or preservation of a wetland
Wetland
A wetland is an area of land whose soil is saturated with water either permanently or seasonally. Wetlands are categorised by their characteristic vegetation, which is adapted to these unique soil conditions....

, stream, or habitat conservation
Habitat conservation
Habitat conservation is a land management practice that seeks to conserve, protect and restore, habitat areas for wild plants and animals, especially conservation reliant species, and prevent their extinction, fragmentation or reduction in range...

 area which offsets expected adverse impacts to similar nearby ecosystem
Ecosystem
An ecosystem is a biological environment consisting of all the organisms living in a particular area, as well as all the nonliving , physical components of the environment with which the organisms interact, such as air, soil, water and sunlight....

s. The goal is to replace the exact function and value of the specific wetland habitats that would be adversely affected by a proposed project.

In the United States
United States
The United States of America is a federal constitutional republic comprising fifty states and a federal district...

, the federal government (under section 404 of the Clean Water Act
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act is the primary federal law in the United States governing water pollution. Commonly abbreviated as the CWA, the act established the goals of eliminating releases of high amounts of toxic substances into water, eliminating additional water pollution by 1985, and ensuring that...

) as well as many state and local governments, require mitigation for the disturbance or destruction of wetland, stream, or endangered wildlife habitat. Once approved by regulatory agencies the mitigation bank may sell credits to developers whose projects will impact these various ecosystems.

Credits are the units of exchange and are defined as the ecological value associated with 1 acres (4,046.9 m²) of a wetland or ecosystem and the linear distance of a stream functioning at the highest possible capacity within the service area of the bank. Credits are evaluated by a Mitigation Bank Review Team.

The MBRT processes and permits the Mitigation Bank. They may consist of some or all of the following:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service, Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, State Environmental Protection Divisions, Local Water Management Districts, County Environmental Departments and the Soil Conservation Service.

There are many advantages to using a mitigation bank over other acceptable industry practices.

Mitigation banks place a perpetual conservation easement on the land, with a trust to fund its stewardship. Many large landowners, including the government are unable to maintain their land so as to retain ecological functionality due to the complexity of the task and the enormity of the cost. Mitigation banks provide advantages to on-site and small parcel mitigation. By consolidating necessary services to create, maintain, and monitor mitigation; banks are able to provide superior services at a lower cost.

Consolidating small parcel wetland loss creates larger more sustainable and functional ecosystems.

Mitigation banks provide many functional business advantages, allowing for ease of development; They allow a developer to maximize the use of their site. Because mitigation bank credits are created prior to impacts, purchasing credits from a mitigation bank decreases permitting time. The cost is often lower than acceptable alternatives.
Regulatory burden and risk is passed from developer to mitigation bank.

Regulatory officials favor mitigation banks due to the consolidation of project parcels make monitoring easier for strained agencies.

Despite policies mandating that habitat trading ensure equivalent value and function, the experience is that most programs are not administered this way. In practice, most habitat trades to date in wetlands programs have been approved on the basis of acres, in many instances ensuring equivalence in neither value nor function. Merely assuming that the compensation involves a similar number of acres falls short of true equivalence unless the replacement ecological functions supplied by those acres are also the same.
The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK