Mini-tender offer
Encyclopedia
A mini-tender offer is an offer to acquire a company's shares directly from current investors in an amount less than 5% of issued stock.
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Thus, mini-tenders do not have to comply with the same required disclosures that are in place for larger tender offer
s, but are still subject to the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act that state that it is illegal "to make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, or to engage in any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative acts or practices, in connection with any tender offer."
The SEC advises extreme caution, so the investor should carefully read the mini-tender disclosure and check market prices with their broker. Many mini-tender offers are made with respect to companies that do not trade on an established market, however.
Problematic is the back office systems of many broker-dealer
s which do not distinguish between mini-tenders and SEC-registered tender offer
s. In a potentially deceptive practice, a mini-tender is never labeled as a "mini-tender." It has been reported that investors assume that mini-tenders have the same protection as larger tenders, simply because both types of offers are presented as a solicitation on the broker's letterhead.
Some mini-tenders are exchange offers, in which one security is exchanged for another. If the investor tenders publicly traded shares in return for shares with an illiquid market, they will end up with securities that they cannot sell.
Crucially, some mini-tender offers do not have to allow investors to back out after tendering their shares, whereas a registered tender offer allows investors to change their minds.
Some deceptive mini-tenders have been made at a small premium to the market, but remain open for weeks or months, locking in the investors' tendered shares. Such bidders are gambling that the market price will eventually rise above the initial bid premium, so they can profit while investors lose out (despite initially believing that they tendered at a premium). However, the bidder must purchase the shares according to the terms of the offer regardless of whether market price has risen, so the bidder may end up losing that gamble.
However, if the offer terms allow, the bidder can continually keep extending the expiration date to give the market price more time to rise above the offer. Thus, investors should read such offers to see if the bidder reserves the right to continually extend the offer. Many bidders provide that they may extend only one time for a limited period. As many mini-tenders do not offer withdrawal rights, the investor essentially loses control of his shares. Some have argued that the bidder is in a no-lose situation either way, if the market price never exceeds the offer price, the mini-tender will be withdrawn and the investors never get their premium. However, many would argue that if a bidder has the right to withdraw the offer, so must the investor, or the contract is illusory (see Illusory contract).
If the market price of the stock falls below the mini-tender price before the offer closes, the bidder can cancel the offer or reduce the offer price. While a price change allows investors to withdraw their shares, this process is not automatic. The onus is on the investor, as they (and not the bidder or broker) are responsible for acquiring the revised offer information and withdrawing their shares by the deadline.
A mini-tender offer may be structured on a first come, first purchase basis, where the bidder accepts shares in order of receipt. Consequently, investors may be pressured into believing that they are obligated to tender their shares before having solid information about the offer.
Mini-tenders often provide a market for investors to sell illiquid securities. Some have argued that this assertion is invalid because the bidder would have more difficulty selling the shares than individual investors, since they have a larger block of accumulated shares. While this is true if bidders are attempting to turn a quick profit, many bidders' strategies are to buy and hold the securities for the long-term.
The boards of target companies such as Adobe Systems
, MetLife, AMD, and Kimberly-Clark
have attempted to counter mini-tenders by issuing recommendations to reject such offers. Brian Lawler of The Motley Fool recommends that investors avoid mini-tender offers.
Subject to Only Some SEC Regulations
If an offer to purchase securities is for less than 5% of the company's securities, it is not governed by Section 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act or Regulation 14D , but only subject to the anti-fraud rules under Regulation 14E.[ Thus, such offers are not required to be filed on a Schedule TOSchedule TO
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, parties who will own more than five percent of a class of the company’s securities after making a tender offer for securities registered under the Exchange Act must file a Schedule TO with the Securities and Exchange Commission...
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Thus, mini-tenders do not have to comply with the same required disclosures that are in place for larger tender offer
Tender offer
Tender offer is a corporate finance term denoting a type of takeover bid. The tender offer is a public, open offer or invitation by a prospective acquirer to all stockholders of a publicly traded corporation to tender their stock for sale at a specified price during a specified time, subject to...
s, but are still subject to the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act that state that it is illegal "to make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, or to engage in any fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative acts or practices, in connection with any tender offer."
The SEC advises extreme caution, so the investor should carefully read the mini-tender disclosure and check market prices with their broker. Many mini-tender offers are made with respect to companies that do not trade on an established market, however.
Problematic is the back office systems of many broker-dealer
Broker-dealer
A broker-dealer is a term used in United States financial services regulations. It is a natural person, a company or other organization that trades securities for its own account or on behalf of its customers....
s which do not distinguish between mini-tenders and SEC-registered tender offer
Tender offer
Tender offer is a corporate finance term denoting a type of takeover bid. The tender offer is a public, open offer or invitation by a prospective acquirer to all stockholders of a publicly traded corporation to tender their stock for sale at a specified price during a specified time, subject to...
s. In a potentially deceptive practice, a mini-tender is never labeled as a "mini-tender." It has been reported that investors assume that mini-tenders have the same protection as larger tenders, simply because both types of offers are presented as a solicitation on the broker's letterhead.
Some mini-tenders are exchange offers, in which one security is exchanged for another. If the investor tenders publicly traded shares in return for shares with an illiquid market, they will end up with securities that they cannot sell.
Crucially, some mini-tender offers do not have to allow investors to back out after tendering their shares, whereas a registered tender offer allows investors to change their minds.
Rationale
Most mini-tenders are made below the value of the security. In some cases, the bidder may be able to turn around and sell the acquired shares at market for a profit. In other cases, the mini-tenders may be for securities that do not have an established market, in which case the purchaser may profit sometime in the future if distributions from such securities exceed the purchase price (or, may lose money if the purchaser was wrong in estimating the security's underlying value). In contrast, traditional tender offers launched with the goal of taking over a company are registered with the SEC and usually offer a substantial premium to market value.Some deceptive mini-tenders have been made at a small premium to the market, but remain open for weeks or months, locking in the investors' tendered shares. Such bidders are gambling that the market price will eventually rise above the initial bid premium, so they can profit while investors lose out (despite initially believing that they tendered at a premium). However, the bidder must purchase the shares according to the terms of the offer regardless of whether market price has risen, so the bidder may end up losing that gamble.
However, if the offer terms allow, the bidder can continually keep extending the expiration date to give the market price more time to rise above the offer. Thus, investors should read such offers to see if the bidder reserves the right to continually extend the offer. Many bidders provide that they may extend only one time for a limited period. As many mini-tenders do not offer withdrawal rights, the investor essentially loses control of his shares. Some have argued that the bidder is in a no-lose situation either way, if the market price never exceeds the offer price, the mini-tender will be withdrawn and the investors never get their premium. However, many would argue that if a bidder has the right to withdraw the offer, so must the investor, or the contract is illusory (see Illusory contract).
If the market price of the stock falls below the mini-tender price before the offer closes, the bidder can cancel the offer or reduce the offer price. While a price change allows investors to withdraw their shares, this process is not automatic. The onus is on the investor, as they (and not the bidder or broker) are responsible for acquiring the revised offer information and withdrawing their shares by the deadline.
A mini-tender offer may be structured on a first come, first purchase basis, where the bidder accepts shares in order of receipt. Consequently, investors may be pressured into believing that they are obligated to tender their shares before having solid information about the offer.
Mini-tenders often provide a market for investors to sell illiquid securities. Some have argued that this assertion is invalid because the bidder would have more difficulty selling the shares than individual investors, since they have a larger block of accumulated shares. While this is true if bidders are attempting to turn a quick profit, many bidders' strategies are to buy and hold the securities for the long-term.
Example
The practice is most associated with a company called TRC Capital, a private firm founded by a Canadian securities lawyer.The boards of target companies such as Adobe Systems
Adobe Systems
Adobe Systems Incorporated is an American computer software company founded in 1982 and headquartered in San Jose, California, United States...
, MetLife, AMD, and Kimberly-Clark
Kimberly-Clark
Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include "Kleenex" facial tissue, "Kotex" feminine hygiene products, "Cottonelle", Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, "KimWipes"...
have attempted to counter mini-tenders by issuing recommendations to reject such offers. Brian Lawler of The Motley Fool recommends that investors avoid mini-tender offers.