List of decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office
Encyclopedia
This is a list of decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal
Appeal procedure before the European Patent Office
Decisions of the first instances of the European Patent Office can be appealed, i.e. challenged, before the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, in a judicial procedure , as opposed to an administrative procedure. These boards act as the final instances in the granting and opposition procedures before the...

 of the European Patent Office
European Patent Office
The European Patent Office is one of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation , the other being the Administrative Council. The EPO acts as executive body for the Organisation while the Administrative Council acts as its supervisory body as well as, to a limited extent, its legislative...

(EPO) in chronological order of the dates when the decisions were issued. The list is incomplete.

Keys: Decision(s), after referral by a Board of Appeal under Art. 112(1)(a) EPC Opinion, after referral by the President of the EPO under Art. 112(1)(b) EPC Decision and opinion, in consolidated or identical cases

1980 – 1989

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 1/83 
G 2/83 
G 3/83 
G 4/83 
G 5/83 
G 6/83 
G 7/83 
12 May 1984 Patentability
Patentability
Within the context of a national or multilateral body of law, an invention is patentable if it meets the relevant legal conditions to be granted a patent...

 - Art. 52(4) - first and second medical indications
(G 1/83, G 5/83 and G 6/83 have been published, respectively in German
German language
German is a West Germanic language, related to and classified alongside English and Dutch. With an estimated 90 – 98 million native speakers, German is one of the world's major languages and is the most widely-spoken first language in the European Union....

, English
English language
English is a West Germanic language that arose in the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of England and spread into what was to become south-east Scotland under the influence of the Anglian medieval kingdom of Northumbria...

 and French
French language
French is a Romance language spoken as a first language in France, the Romandy region in Switzerland, Wallonia and Brussels in Belgium, Monaco, the regions of Quebec and Acadia in Canada, and by various communities elsewhere. Second-language speakers of French are distributed throughout many parts...

, the three official languages of the EPO. The four other decisions have not been published.
)
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g830001dp1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g830005ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g830006fp1.htm
G 1/84
G 1/84
G 1/84 is a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office , which was issued on July 24, 1985. The Board held in this decision that:The decision was however overruled by the later decision of the Enlarged Board G 9/93, where it was held that a European patent cannot be...

 
24 July 1985 Opposition by proprietor - overturned by G 9/93 
G 1/86  24 June 1987 Art. 122 - Restitutio in integrum
Restitutio in integrum
Restitutio in integrum is a Latin maxim which means restoration to original condition. It is one of the primary guiding principles behind the awarding of damages in common law negligence claims...

- opponent not barred - time limit statement grounds of appeal
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g860001ep1.htm
G 4/88  24 April 1989 Opposition - transfer - part of the business assets http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g880004ep1.htm
G 2/88  12 November 1989 Art. 123(3) - change of category - use claim novel by its purpose http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g880002ep1.htm
G 6/88  12 November 1989 Novelty - second non-medical indication yes
(Partially identical to G 2/88.)
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g880006ep1.htm

1990 – 1994

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 1/89 
G 2/89 
21 February 1990 Patent Cooperation Treaty
Patent Cooperation Treaty
The Patent Cooperation Treaty is an international patent law treaty, concluded in 1970. It provides a unified procedure for filing patent applications to protect inventions in each of its contracting states...

 - unity of invention
Unity of invention
In most patent laws, unity of invention is a formal administrative requirement that must be met by a patent application to become a granted patent. Basically, a patent application can relate only to one invention or a group of closely related inventions. The purpose of this requirement is...

 - a priori and a posteriori
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g890001ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g890002ep1.htm
G 5/88 
G 7/88 
G 8/88 
16 November 1990 Filing of notice of opposition at the DPMA
Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
The Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt or German Patent and Trade Mark Office is the German national patent office, with headquarters in Munich, and offices in Berlin and Jena...

 before July 1, 1989
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g880005ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g880007ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g880008ep1.htm
G 7/91 
G 8/91 
11 May 1992 Appeal - withdrawal of sole appellant - termination http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g910007ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g910008ep1.htm
G 3/89 
G 11/91 
19 November 1992 Art. 123(2) - strictly declaratory nature of Rule 88 corrections http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g890003ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g910011ep1.htm
G 1/92  18 December 1992 Novelty
Novelty (patent)
Novelty is a patentability requirement. An invention is not patentable if the claimed subject matter was disclosed before the date of filing, or before the date of priority if a priority is claimed, of the patent application....

 - availability to the public - prior use
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g920001ep1.htm
G 9/91  31 March 1993 Framework of opposition and appeal - extent http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g910009ep1.htm
G 10/91  31 March 1993 Framework of opposition and appeal - grounds http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g910010ep1.htm
G 4/92  22 October 1993 Oral proceedings - party absent - new facts or evidence http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g920004ep1.htm
G 1/93  21 February 1994 Art. 123(2) & (3) - conflict - inescapable trap http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g930001ep1.htm
G 9/93  7 June 1994 Opposition by patent proprietor - no - overturning G 1/84
G 1/84
G 1/84 is a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office , which was issued on July 24, 1985. The Board held in this decision that:The decision was however overruled by the later decision of the Enlarged Board G 9/93, where it was held that a European patent cannot be...

 
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g930009ep1.htm
G 9/92 
G 4/93 
14 July 1994 Framework of appeal - extent (decision) - reformatio in peius
Reformatio in peius
is a Latin phrase used in law meaning that a decision from a court of appeal is amended to a worse one....


(With an indication of a minority opinion.)
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g920009ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g930004ex1.htm
G 1/94  5 November 1994 Intervention during pending appeal proceedings - fresh grounds http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g940001ep1.htm
G 10/93  30 November 1994 Framework of appeal - ex parte - main aim: examination of the contested decision but no ban from introducing new grounds, facts or evidence http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g930010ep1.htm

1995 – 1999

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 4/95  19 February 1996 Oral proceedings - representation - accompanying person ("Oral submissions by an accompanying person in opposition or opposition appeal proceedings") http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g950004ep1.htm
G 1/95 
G 7/95 
19 July 1996 Framework of opposition and appeal - Art. 100(a) - collection of grounds http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g950001ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g950007ep1.htm
G 3/97 
G 4/97 
2 January 1999 Opposition on behalf of third party - strawman
Straw man
A straw man is a component of an argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position, twisting his words or by means of [false] assumptions...

 - circumvention of law by abuse of process
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g970003ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g970004ep1.htm
G 1/97  12 October 1999 Appeal - request to review a final decision, not provided for in the EPC http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g970001ep1.htm

2000 – 2004

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 1/99  4 February 2001 Framework of appeal -extent (decision) - reformatio in peius - exception http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g990001ep1.htm
G 2/98  31 May 2001 Priority
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property
The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, signed in Paris, France, on March 20, 1883, was one of the first intellectual property treaties. It established a Union for the protection of industrial property...

 - same invention - direct and unambiguous derivation
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g980002ep1.htm
G 1/03
G 1/03 and G 2/03
G 1/03 and G 2/03 are two decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office , which were both issued on April 8, 2004....

 
G 2/03
G 1/03 and G 2/03
G 1/03 and G 2/03 are two decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office , which were both issued on April 8, 2004....

 
8 April 2004 Allowability of disclaimers
Disclaimer (patent)
In patent law, a disclaimer are words identifying, in a claim, subject-matter that is not claimed. By extension, a disclaimer may also mean the action of introduction a negative limitation in a claim, i.e. "an amendment to a claim resulting in the incorporation therein of a "negative" technical...

 
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g030001ep1.htm
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/biblio/g030002ep1.htm

2005 – 2009

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 2/04 25 May 2005 Transfer of opposition (i.e., of the status as an opponent), filing of an appeal when "there is a justifiable legal uncertainty as to how the law is to be interpreted in respect of the question of who the correct party to the proceedings is". http://archive.epo.org/epo/pubs/oj005/11_05/11_5495.pdf
G 1/05
G 1/05 and G 1/06
G 1/05 and G 1/06 are decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office that were issued on 28 June 2007 and answer questions relating to divisional applications under the European Patent Convention . The two decisions were published in the Official Journal of the EPO in May...


G 1/06
G 1/05 and G 1/06
G 1/05 and G 1/06 are decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office that were issued on 28 June 2007 and answer questions relating to divisional applications under the European Patent Convention . The two decisions were published in the Official Journal of the EPO in May...

28 June 2007 Divisional applications http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/pdf/g000105.pdf
http://legal.european-patent-office.org/dg3/pdf/g000106.pdf
G 2/06
G 2/06
G 2/06 is a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office , which was issued on November 25, 2008. The Enlarged Board of Appeal decided that, under the European Patent Convention , a patent cannot be granted for an invention which necessarily involves the use and...

25 November 2008 Stem cell
Stem cell
This article is about the cell type. For the medical therapy, see Stem Cell TreatmentsStem cells are biological cells found in all multicellular organisms, that can divide and differentiate into diverse specialized cell types and can self-renew to produce more stem cells...

s, non-patentability of inventions involving the use and destruction of human embryos, .
http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/428862B3DA9649A9C125750E002E8E94/$FILE/G0002_06_en.pdf

From 2010

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 1/07
G 1/07
G 1/07 is a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office , which was issued on February 15, 2010. The Enlarged Board of Appeal notably decided that, under the European Patent Convention ,- See also :...

15 February 2010 Methods for treatment by surgery http://archive.epo.org/epo/pubs/oj011/03_11/03_1341.pdfhttp://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/cdd5fb0c3153e9c3c12576cb00563d2d/$FILE/G1_07_en.pdf
G 4/08 16 February 2010 Language of the proceedings. No change of the language of a Euro-PCT application upon entry into European phase if the language of the PCT application is already in an EPO official language. http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/78454414353b7aa2c12576cc004087bd/$FILE/G4_08_fr.pdf
G 2/08 19 February 2010 Dosage regimen http://archive.epo.org/epo/pubs/oj010/10_10/10_4560.pdfhttp://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/1c9976e4866080a2c12576cf00417e3e/$FILE/G2_08_en.pdf
G 3/08
G 3/08
Under case number G 3/08, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO issued on May 12, 2010 an opinion in response to questions referred to it by the President of the European Patent Office , Alison Brimelow, on October 22, 2008...

12 May 2010 Patentability of programs for computers, referral dismissed http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/DC6171F182D8B65AC125772100426656/$File/G3_08_opinion_en.pdf
G 1/09 27 September 2010 Pending application. Time limit for filing a divisional application, and meaning of "pending" in https://register.epoline.org/espacenet/application?documentId=EQTOHY244333154&number=EP05027368&lng=en&npl=false
G 2/07
G 1/08
9 December 2010 Essentially biological processes http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/791D677646A4A968C12577F4004C3445/$File/G2_07_en.pdf http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/E72204692CFE1DC3C12577F4004BEA42/$File/G1_08_en.pdf
G 2/10 30 August 2011 Allowability of disclaimers under if the disclaimed subject-matter was (positively) disclosed as an embodiment of the invention in the application as filed http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/C777CFB3654BB240C12578FE00485B6C/$File/g2_10.pdf

Pending referrals

Reference Date Keywords and/or comments Sources
G 1/10 referred 23 June 2010 Correction of the decision to grant after initiation of opposition proceedings, application of (referral in Board of Appeal decision T 1145/09) https://register.epoline.org/espacenet/application?documentId=EQE8ECCL0125493&number=EP99115002&lng=en&npl=false
G 1/11 referred 4 August 2011 Competence of the Boards of Appeal

Trivia

  • Case G 3/92 also led to an indication of a dissenting opinion, relating to an issue of right to the patent
  • Case G 9/93 reversed previous opinion laid out in G 1/84, regarding the allowability of an opposition by the patent proprietor. G 1/84 accepted such type of opinion, G 9/93 then rejected it.

External links

The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK