List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 547
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 547 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 547 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- Texaco Inc. v. Dagher,
- Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.,
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products...
, - Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 , is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold funding from universities if they refuse to give military recruiters...
, - Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. DabitMerrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. DabitMerrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit, 547 U.S. 71 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the extent to which state law securities fraud class action claims were preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998...
, - United States v. GrubbsUnited States v. GrubbsUnited States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the constitutionality of "anticipatory" search warrants under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution...
, - Georgia v. RandolphGeorgia v. RandolphGeorgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 , is a case wherein the U.S. Supreme Court held that without a search warrant, police had no constitutional right to search a house where one resident consents to the search while another resident objects. The Court distinguished this case from the "co-occupant...
, - Arizona v. CaliforniaArizona v. CaliforniaArizona v. California is a set of United States Supreme Court cases, all dealing with water distribution from the Colorado River.When a dispute arises between two states, the case is filed for original jurisdiction with the United States Supreme Court. This is one of the very limited circumstances...
, - Gonzales v. Thomas,
- Salinas v. United States,
- Northern Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Chatham County,
- Day v. McDonoughDay v. McDonoughDay v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198 , is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the one year statute of limitations for filing habeas corpus petitions that was established by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996...
, - Jones v. FlowersJones v. FlowersJones v. Flowers, , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the due process requirement that a state give notice to an owner before selling his property to satisfy his unpaid taxes...
, - Hartman v. MooreHartman v. MooreHartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 , is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the pleading standard for retaliatory prosecution claims against government officials...
, - Arkansas Dept. of Health and Human Servs. v. Ahlborn,
- Marshall v. MarshallMarshall v. MarshallMarshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 , is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a federal district court had equal or concurrent jurisdiction with state probate courts over tort claims under state common law...
, - Holmes v. South CarolinaHolmes v. South CarolinaHolmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the right of a criminal defendant to present evidence that a third party instead committed the crime...
, - Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., 547 U.S. 356 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the ability of an Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan fiduciary to recover medical costs from a beneficiary who has been reimbursed for injuries by a...
, - S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection,
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoDaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoDaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332 was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the standing of taxpayers to challenge state tax laws in federal court...
, - eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L. L. C.,
- Brigham City v. StuartBrigham City v. StuartBrigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement...
, - Garcetti v. CeballosGarcetti v. CeballosGarcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 , is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the...
, - Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.In Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation, the United States Supreme Court relied on Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation and held that to establish standing under the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act provision that creates a civil cause of action for any...
, - Zedner v. United StatesZedner v. United StatesZedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 , was a United States Supreme Court case involving the right to a speedy trial. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled that a defendant cannot prospectively waive the protections of the Speedy Trial Act...
, - Whitman v. Department of Transportation,
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams,
- House v. BellHouse v. BellHouse v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 , was a United States Supreme Court case challenging the permissibility of new DNA forensic evidence that becomes available post-conviction, in capital punishment appeals when those claims have defaulted pursuant to state law. The Court found that admitting new DNA...
, - Hill v. McDonoughHill v. McDonoughHill v. McDonough , was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court challenging the use of lethal injection as a form of execution in the state of Florida. The Court ruled unanimously that a challenge to the method of execution as violating the Eighth Amendment to the United States...
, - Hudson v. MichiganHudson v. MichiganHudson v. Michigan, 547 U. S. 586 , is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence does not require...
, - Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust,
- Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.,
- Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighEmpire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighEmpire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh, 547 U.S. 677 is a United States Supreme Court case.Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. was a health insurance company that sued the estate of a deceased federal employee who received $157,000 in insurance benefits as the result of an injury...
, - Rapanos v. United StatesRapanos v. United StatesRapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 , was a United States Supreme Court case challenging federal jurisdiction to regulate isolated wetlands under the Clean Water Act. It was the first major environmental case heard by the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Roberts and Associate Justice, Samuel...
, - Davis v. WashingtonDavis v. WashingtonDavis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that hearsay statements made in a 9-1-1 call asking for aid were not "testimonial" in nature and thus their introduction at trial did not violate the Confrontation Clause as defined in Crawford v...
, - Samson v. CaliforniaSamson v. CaliforniaSamson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed the decision of the California Court of Appeal; which held that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the...
, - Youngblood v. West Virginia,