List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 387
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 387 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 387 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- In re GaultIn Re GaultIn re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the...
, - Dombrowski v. Eastland, (per curiam)
- Iacurci v. Lummus Co., (per curiam)
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Rubio v. United States, (per curiam)
- Gerberding v. Tahash, (per curiam)
- Skolnick v. Kerner, (per curiam)
- Banks v. California, (per curiam)
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Holding v. Blankenship, (per curiam)
- Blankenship v. Holding, (per curiam)
- Wirtz v. Operating Engineers, (per curiam)
- Moody v. Flowers,
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.,
- Dusch v. Davis,
- Boutilier v. INS,
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerAbbott Laboratories v. GardnerAbbott Laboratories v. Gardner, , was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. Abbott Laboratories held that drug companies were not prohibited by the ripeness doctrine from challenging a U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation requiring a prescription drug's generic name to...
, - Toilet Goods Assn., Inc. v. Gardner,
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.,
- SEC v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.,
- Northeastern Pa. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United States,
- Hoffa v. United States, (per curiam)
- Krakoff v. Weaver, (per curiam)
- Tennessee v. Clarksville, (per curiam)
- Walker v. Wainwright, (per curiam)
- Chewie v. Lock, (per curiam)
- Mascuilli v. United States, (per curiam)
- United States v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank Stock Corp., (per curiam)
- Julian Messner, Inc. v. Spahn, (per curiam)
- Greene v. Texas, (per curiam)
- Belcher v. Wisconsin, (per curiam)
- Frazier v. Lane, (per curiam)
- Barnett v. Nevada, (per curiam)
- FTC v. Universal-Rundle Corp.,
- Afroyim v. RuskAfroyim v. RuskAfroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 , was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that a person born or naturalized in the United States cannot be deprived of his or her citizenship involuntarily. The U.S. government had attempted to revoke the citizenship of a man...
, - Warden, Md. Penitentiary v. HaydenWarden, Md. Penitentiary v. HaydenWarden v. Hayden, , was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 'mere evidence' may be seized and held as evidence in a trial. This finding reversed previous Supreme Court decisions such as Boyd v...
, - Chicago & North Western R. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.,
- Reitman v. MulkeyReitman v. MulkeyReitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 , was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that states could remove a constitutional amendment passed by initiative, if the proffered amendment "encouraged" racial discrimination.In 1964, pursuant to an initiative and...
, - American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.,
- Stoeckle v. Wolke, (per curiam)
- Sweet Briar Institute v. Button, (per curiam)
- Cepero v. Industrial Comm'n of P. R., (per curiam)
- United States v. Continental Oil Co., (per curiam)
- Cepero v. Colon, (per curiam)
- Markis v. United States, (per curiam)
- Delaney v. Florida, (per curiam)
- Patterson v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., (per curiam)
- Schackman v. Arnebergh, (per curiam)
- Udall v. FPC,
- Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch,
- Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. United States,
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco,
- See v. Seattle,
- Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. Trainmen,
- Elliott v. Oregon, (per curiam)
- Clark v. Alabama, (per curiam)
- INS v. Lavoie, (per curiam)
- Aluminum Co. of America v. United States, (per curiam)
- Gills v. California, (per curiam)
- Camodeo v. United States, (per curiam)