List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 380
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 380 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 380 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- Udall v. Tallman,
- Singer v. United States,
- Crider v. Zurich Ins. Co.,
- Freedman v. MarylandFreedman v. MarylandFreedman v. Maryland, , is a United States Supreme Court case that ended government-operated rating boards with a decision that a rating board could only approve a film and had no power to ban a film. The ruling also concluded that a rating board must either approve a film within a reasonable time,...
, - United States v. Gainey,
- Carrington v. Rash,
- United States v. Ventresca,
- In re Ryan, (per curiam)
- Mason v. Midwestern Gas Transmission Co., (per curiam)
- City of Coronado v. San Diego Unified Port Dist., (per curiam)
- Drueding v. Devlin, (per curiam)
- Maddox v. Birzgalis, (per curiam)
- Bonanno v. Louisiana, (per curiam)
- Blaauw v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co., (per curiam)
- United States v. Mississippi,
- Louisiana v. United States,
- United States v. Boston & Maine R. Co.,
- United States v. SeegerUnited States v. SeegerUnited States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 , was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the exemption from the military draft for conscientious objectors could not be reserved only for those professing conformity with the moral directives of a supreme being, but also for those whose...
, - Department of Mental Hygiene of Cal. v. Kirchner,
- Swain v. AlabamaSwain v. AlabamaSwain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , was a case heard before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the legality of a struck jury....
, - Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., (per curiam)
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., (per curiam)
- Arthur v. Colorado, (per curiam)
- Hall v. Illinois, (per curiam)
- Davis v. Mabry, (per curiam)
- Stadler v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal., (per curiam)
- Barnes v. Texas, (per curiam)
- Seals v. Alabama, (per curiam)
- Radio & Television Technicians v. Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc., (per curiam)
- Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Bowers, (per curiam)
- Trans-Lux Distributing Corp. v. Board of Regents of Univ. of N. Y., (per curiam)
- Santos v. Texas, (per curiam)
- Baker v. Alaska, (per curiam)
- Martinez v. United States, (per curiam)
- Harrison v. McNamara, (per curiam)
- Genovese v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- Marvel v. United States, (per curiam)
- Textile Workers v. Darlington Mfg. Co.,
- NLRB v. Brown Food Stores,
- American Ship Building Co. v. NLRB,
- Sansone v. United States,
- Henry v. Collins, (per curiam)
- O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc., (per curiam)
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.,
- Pointer v. Texas,
- Douglas v. Alabama,
- Burnett v. New York Central R. Co.,
- NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,
- Jenkins v. United States, (per curiam)
- Abernathy v. Alabama, (per curiam)
- Chicago & North Western R. Co. v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co., (per curiam)
- McKinnie v. Tennessee, (per curiam)
- U.S. A. C. Transport, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
- American Oil Co. v. Neill,
- Hanna v. PlumerHanna v. PlumerHanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court further refined the Erie doctrine regarding when and by what means federal courts are obliged to apply state law in cases brought under diversity jurisdiction...
, - Dombrowski v. PfisterDombrowski v. PfisterDombrowski v. Pfister was a landmark Supreme Court case brought forth by Dr. James Dombrowski along with William Kunstler, founder of the Center for Constitutional Rights, against the governor of Louisiana, law enforcement officers, and the chairperson of the state's Legislative Joint Committee...
, - American Comm. for Protection of Foreign Born v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., (per curiam)
- Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., (per curiam)
- Texas v. New Jersey,
- Callender v. Florida, (per curiam)
- Gold v. DiCarlo, (per curiam)
- Corpora v. New York, (per curiam)
- Cumberland Farms Northern, Inc. v. Maine Milk Comm'n, (per curiam)
- Brown v. California,
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. NLRB, (per curiam)
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. NLRB, (per curiam)
- Thomas v. Mississippi, (per curiam)
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. NLRB, (per curiam)
- Carolina & Northwestern R. Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Murray v. United States, (per curiam)
- Harman v. ForsseniusHarman v. ForsseniusHarman v. Forssenius, was a 1965 United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that Virginia's law partially eliminating the poll tax violated the Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution...
, - Armstrong v. Manzo,
- General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia,
- Commissioner v. Brown,
- FTC v. Consolidated Foods Corp.,
- Griffin v. CaliforniaGriffin v. CaliforniaGriffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, by a 6-2 vote, that it is a violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights for the prosecutor to comment to the jury on the defendant's declining to testify, or for the judge to instruct the...
, - Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. Commissioner,
- Railway Clerks v. Association for Benefit of Noncontract Employees,
- Commissioner v. Estate of Noel,
- Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax Comm'n,
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaOne 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaOne 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania was a Supreme Court of the United States case handed down in 1965. The Court ruled that civil forfeiture could not apply where the evidence used to invoke the forfeiture was obtained illegally....
,