List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 379
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

 cases from volume 379 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:
  • Louden v. Utah, (per curiam)
  • Davis v. Neely, (per curiam)
  • Plantation v. Utilities Operating Co., (per curiam)
  • Schackman v. California, (per curiam)
  • Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa., (per curiam)
  • Accelerated Transport-Pony Express, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
  • Alvarez v. California, (per curiam)
  • Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York, (per curiam)
  • Edell v. Mack, (per curiam)
  • Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
  • Maloney v. Holden, (per curiam)
  • Wycoff Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah, (per curiam)
  • Agee v. Columbus Bar Assn., (per curiam)
  • Yorty v. Jordan, (per curiam)
  • Bennett v. County of Dade, (per curiam)
  • Jurus v. Columbus Bar Assn., (per curiam)
  • Lind v. Minnesota, (per curiam)
  • Ford v. Louisiana, (per curiam)
  • McIlvaine v. Louisiana, (per curiam)
  • Wasmuth v. Allen, (per curiam)
  • Wright v. Illinois, (per curiam)
  • Cepero v. President of United States, (per curiam)
  • Binz v. Helvetia Fla. Enterprises, Inc., (per curiam)
  • Gager v. Kasdon, (per curiam)
  • Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Furman, (per curiam)
  • Alhambra Trucking Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal., (per curiam)
  • Dixie Feed & Seed Co. v. Byrd, (per curiam)
  • Boineau v. Thornton, (per curiam)
  • Bohman v. Boston Real Estate Comm'n, (per curiam)
  • Bohman v. Peutucket Five Cent Saving Bank, (per curiam)
  • Mamula v. Steelworkers, (per curiam)
  • Giova v. Rosenberg, (per curiam)
  • Tancil v. Woolls, (per curiam)
  • Shipe v. Brennan, (per curiam)
  • NLRB v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.,
  • Railway Clerks v. United Air Lines, Inc., (per curiam)
  • Hooper v. Duncan, (per curiam)
  • Albaugh v. Tawes, (per curiam)
  • Trautwein v. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles, (per curiam)
  • Denman v. White, (per curiam)
  • Brulotte v. Thys Co.,
  • Scranton v. Drew, (per curiam)
  • Boles v. Stevenson, (per curiam)
  • Boyer v. Elkins, (per curiam)
  • Associated Press v. Walker, (per curiam)
  • United States v. Powell,
  • Ryan v. United States,
  • Garrison v. Louisiana,
  • Beck v. Ohio
    Beck v. Ohio
    Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the police arrested the defendant without probable cause, and therefore the evidence found on his person after taking him to the police station were found as part of an unconstitutional search.-Facts:A tip was given...

    ,
  • Schlagenhauf v. Holder,
  • Petroleum Workers v. American Oil Co., (per curiam)
  • Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan., (per curiam)
  • Northwestern Pacific R. Co. v. ICC, (per curiam)
  • McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd., (per curiam)
  • Calhoon v. Harvey,
  • Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.,
  • Musicians v. Wittstein,
  • McLaughlin v. Florida
    McLaughlin v. Florida
    McLaughlin v. Florida 379 U.S. 184 , was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a cohabitation law of Florida, part of the state's anti-miscegenation laws, was unconstitutional. The law prohibited habitual cohabitation by two unmarried people of opposite sex, if one...

    ,
  • Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. United States, (per curiam)
  • Moity v. Louisiana, (per curiam)
  • Mutter v. Wisconsin, (per curiam)
  • Cross v. Bruning, (per curiam)
  • Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB,
  • Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.,
  • Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States,
  • Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in forbidding racial discrimination in restaurants as this was a burden to interstate commerce...

    ,
  • Hamm v. Rock Hill,
  • King v. United States,
  • All States Freight, Inc. v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.,
  • Piano Workers v. W. W. Kimball Co., (per curiam)
  • Green v. Bomar, (per curiam)
  • Parsons v. Buckley, (per curiam)
  • California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.,
  • United States v. First Nat. City Bank,
  • Whitney Nat. Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.,
  • Fortson v. Dorsey,
  • Henry v. Mississippi,
  • Turner v. Louisiana,
  • Stanford v. Texas
    Stanford v. Texas
    Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 , is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It stated in clear terms that, pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment rules regarding search and seizure applied to state governments. While this principle had been outlined in other...

    ,
  • Jankovich v. Indiana Toll Road Comm'n,
  • El Paso v. Simmons,
  • Cox v. Louisiana
    Cox v. Louisiana
    Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 , was a United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It held that a state government cannot employ "breach of the peace" statutes against protesters engaging in peaceable demonstrations that may potentially incite...

    ,
  • Cox v. Louisiana
    Cox v. Louisiana
    Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 , was a United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It held that a state government cannot employ "breach of the peace" statutes against protesters engaging in peaceable demonstrations that may potentially incite...

    ,
  • SEC v. American Trailer Rentals Co.,
  • Fortson v. Toombs, (per curiam)
  • Arrow Transp. Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co., (per curiam)
  • NLRB v. Adams Dairy, Inc., (per curiam)
  • Tisone v. Ohio, (per curiam)
  • Halpert v. Udall, (per curiam)
  • Winkle v. Bannan, (per curiam)
  • Thorn v. Harrisburg Trust Co., (per curiam)
  • Winship v. Corpus Christi, (per curiam)
  • Kitty Hawk Development Co. v. Colorado Springs, (per curiam)
  • Sheridan v. Gardner, (per curiam)
  • Voorhes v. Dempsey, (per curiam)
  • Lyles v. Beto, (per curiam)
  • Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Washington, (per curiam)
  • Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox,
  • Davis v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., (per curiam)
  • Lisbon Salesbook Co. v. Ohio, (per curiam)
  • Texas v. New Jersey,
  • Blow v. North Carolina, (per curiam)
  • FPC v. Amerada Petroleum Corp., (per curiam)
  • Hearne v. Smylie, (per curiam)
  • Forty-Fourth Gen. Assembly of Colo. v. Lucas, (per curiam)
  • Hughes v. WMCA, Inc., (per curiam)
The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK