List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 378
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 378 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 378 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- Malloy v. HoganMalloy v. HoganMalloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States deemed a defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was applicable within state courts as well as federal courts...
, - United States v. Boyd,
- Murphy v. Waterfront Comm'n of N. Y. Harbor,
- Aguilar v. TexasAguilar v. TexasAguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that “[a]lthough an affidavit supporting a search warrant may be based on hearsay information and need not reflect the direct personal observations of the affiant, the magistrate must be informed of some...
, - Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp., (per curiam)
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for Cal. v. Ammex Warehouse Co. of San Ysidro, (per curiam)
- Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United States, (per curiam)
- Dunne Leases Cars & Trucks, Inc. v. Lussier, (per curiam)
- Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (per curiam)
- Elfbrandt v. Russell, (per curiam)
- Curtis, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Zoumah v. United States, (per curiam)
- Griffin v. MarylandGriffin v. MarylandGriffin v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 130 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the convictions of five African Americans who were arrested during a protest of a privately owned amusement park by a park employee who was also a deputy sheriff...
, - Fallen v. United States,
- Barr v. City of ColumbiaBarr v. City of ColumbiaBarr v. Columbia, 378 U.S. 146 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the convictions of five African Americans who were refused service at a lunch counter of a department store based upon a prior Court decision, holding that there was insufficient evidence to support...
, - Robinson v. FloridaRobinson v. FloridaRobinson v. Florida, 378 U.S. 153 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the convictions of several white and African American persons who were refused service at a restaurant based upon a prior Court decision, holding that a Florida regulation requiring a restaurant...
, - United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.,
- Jacobellis v. OhioJacobellis v. OhioJacobellis v. Ohio, , was a United States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent with the First Amendment, ban the showing of a French film called The Lovers which the state had deemed obscene.Nico Jacobellis, manager of the Heights Art...
, - Quantity of Books v. KansasQuantity of Books v. KansasQuantity of Books v. Kansas, is an in rem United States Supreme Court decision on First Amendment questions relating to the forfeiture of obscene material...
, - Bell v. MarylandBell v. MarylandBell v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 226 , provided an opportunity for the Supreme Court of the United States to determine whether racial discrimination in the provision of public accommodations by a privately-owned restaurant violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the 14th Amendment to the...
, - Bouie v. City of ColumbiaBouie v. City of ColumbiaBouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that due process prohibits retroactive application of any judicial construction of a criminal statute that is unexpected and indefensible by reference to the law which has been expressed prior...
, - Jackson v. Denno,
- United States v. Continental Can Co.United States v. Continental Can Co.United States v. Continental Can Co., , was a U.S. Supreme Court case which addressed antitrust issues. One issue it addressed was how should a market segment be defined for purposes of reviewing a merger of companies which manufacture different but related products.-Background:In 1956, Continental...
, - Escobedo v. IllinoisEscobedo v. IllinoisEscobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court held in Gideon v...
, - Aptheker v. Secretary of StateAptheker v. Secretary of StateAptheker v. Secretary of State 378 U.S. 500 is a landmark case on the right to travel and passport restrictions as they relate to Fifth Amendment due process rights and First Amendment free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of association rights...
, - Berman v. United States, (per curiam)
- Dresner v. Tallahassee, (per curiam)
- Aldrich v. Aldrich, (per curiam)
- Leonard v. United States, (per curiam)
- Cooper v. PateCooper v. PateCooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 , was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled for the first time that state prison inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the Civil Rights Act of 1871. This case followed Jones v...
, (per curiam) - Drews v. Maryland, (per curiam)
- Williams v. North Carolina, (per curiam)
- Rogers v. United States, (per curiam)
- Green v. Virginia, (per curiam)
- Mitchell v. Charleston, (per curiam)
- Harris v. Virginia, (per curiam)
- Swann v. Adams, (per curiam)
- Meyers v. Thigpen, (per curiam)
- Lucas v. Adams, (per curiam)
- Nolan v. Rhodes, (per curiam)
- West v. Carr, (per curiam)
- Glass v. Hancock County Election Comm'n, (per curiam)
- Williams v. Moss, (per curiam)
- Germano v. Kerner, (per curiam)
- Marshall v. Hare, (per curiam)
- Franklin v. Butterworth, (per curiam)
- Senk v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- Hearne v. Smylie, (per curiam)
- Pinney v. Butterworth, (per curiam)
- Hill v. Davis, (per curiam)
- Lathan v. New York, (per curiam)
- Lopez v. Texas, (per curiam)
- Oister v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- Muschette v. United States, (per curiam)
- Del Hoyo v. New York, (per curiam)
- Pea v. United States, (per curiam)
- Harris v. Texas, (per curiam)
- Catanzaro v. New York, (per curiam)
- Owen v. Arizona, (per curiam)
- McNerlin v. Denno, (per curiam)
- Tralins v. Gerstein, (per curiam)
- Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein, (per curiam)
- Fried v. New York, (per curiam)
- Mayer v. Rusk, (per curiam)
- Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington, (per curiam)
- Bob Jones Univ., Inc. v. Greenville, (per curiam)
- Texas Co. (P. R.) Inc. v. Secretary of Treasury of P. R., (per curiam)
- McLeod v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- Blair v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- Hudson County News Co. v. Sills, (per curiam)
- Smith v. Crouse, (per curiam)
- Ruark v. Colorado, (per curiam)
- Peoples v. United States, (per curiam)
- Fox v. North Carolina, (per curiam)
- Copeland v. Secretary of State, (per curiam)
- Etchieson v. Texas, (per curiam)