List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 359

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

cases from volume 359 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:

New York v. O'Neill,
Harris v. United States,
Aho v. Jacobsen, (per curiam)
McDaniel v. The Lisholt, (per curiam)
New Jersey v. United States, (per curiam)
Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. Collector of Revenue, (per curiam)
E T & W N C Transp. Co. v. Currie, (per curiam)
United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc.,
Brown v. United States
Brown v. United States
Brown v. United States, , was an appeal from the Court of Claims regarding one James Brown, the intestate of the appellant, who was a boatswain in the United States Navy...

,
Ganger v. Miami, (per curiam)
Townsend v. Sain, (per curiam)
SEC v. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. of America,
Tak Shan Fong v. United States,
Sims v. United States,
Spevack v. Strauss, (per curiam)
Page v. United States, (per curiam)
Joseph v. Indiana, (per curiam)
Woody v. United States, (per curiam)
Los Angeles v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal., (per curiam)
Handford v. United States, (per curiam)
Cephas v. West Virginia, (per curiam)
Bartkus v. Illinois,
Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. Virginia,
The Monrosa v. Carbon Black Export, Inc.,
Abbate v. United States,
Friedman v. United States, (per curiam)
Teitelbaum v. California, (per curiam)
Turner v. Kansas, (per curiam)
Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.,
Parsons v. Smith,
Baker v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., (per curiam)
Fosdick v. Linzell, (per curiam)
Bristol v. Heaton, (per curiam)
Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal,
San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon,
United States v. Shirey,
Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United States,
Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Comm'n,
Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.,
Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill Machinery Corp.,
Koller v. United States, (per curiam)
Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. v. Michigan Corporation and Securities Comm'n, (per curiam)
Whyte v. Coast Cities Coaches, Inc., (per curiam)
Braeburn Securities Corp. v. Smith, (per curiam)
Burke v. Bennett, (per curiam)
Ohio ex rel. Iaus v. Carlton, (per curiam)
McCann v. New York, (per curiam)
Fore v. Toth, (per curiam)
Riley v. New Jersey, (per curiam)
United States v. Isthmian S. S. Co.,
Felter v. Southern Pacific Co.,
Commercial Communications, Inc. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal., (per curiam)
Commercial Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
Don McCullagh, Inc. v. Michigan, (per curiam)
Scull v. Virginia ex rel. Comm. on Law Reform and Racial Activities
Scull v. Virginia ex rel. Comm. on Law Reform and Racial Activities
Scull v. Virginia ex rel. Committee on Law Reform and Racial Activities, 359 U.S. 344 is a 9-to-0 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that a conviction violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution if the defendant is not...

,
Plumbers v. County of Door,
Frank v. Maryland
Frank v. Maryland
Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360 , was United States Supreme Court interpreting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.Frank refused to allow the health inspectors into his home citing the Fourth Amendment...

,
FTC v. Mandel Brothers, Inc.,
Irvin v. Dowd
Irvin v. Dowd
Irvin v. Dowd, 359 U.S. 394 , was a United States Supreme Court case. It involved an escaped convict's denial of appeal. The convict sought a federal writ of habeas corpus.Irvin v...

,
Arroyo v. United States,
Grocery Drivers v. Seven Up Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, Inc., (per curiam)
St. Peter's Roman Catholic Parish v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh, (per curiam)
Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Mullen, (per curiam)
Minney v. City of Azusa, (per curiam)
Dick v. New York Life Ins. Co.,
T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United States,
Patterson v. United States, (per curiam)
DeVries v. Baumgartner's Elec. Constr. Co., (per curiam)
Anderson v. Cedar Rapids, (per curiam)
Dyer v. SEC, (per curiam)
Cady v. Iowa, (per curiam)
Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover,
Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 359 U.S. 520 , is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Illinois law requiring trucks to have mudguards was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause.- Background :...

,
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Washington, (per curiam)
Southern Pacific Co. v. Corporation Comm'n of Ariz., (per curiam)
Rodgers v. Utah, (per curiam)
State Athletic Comm'n v. Dorsey, (per curiam)
In re Sarner, (per curiam)
Lamar Bath House Co. v. Hot Springs, (per curiam)
Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Illinois, (per curiam)
Vitarelli v. Seaton,
NAACP v. Williams, (per curiam)
Siegel v. Association of Bar of City of New York, (per curiam)
Ohio ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co., (per curiam)

The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.