List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 274
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

 cases from volume 274 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:
  • Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Minnesota, 274 U.S. 1 (1927)
  • Ohio Public Service Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Fritz, 274 U.S. 12 (1927)
  • Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co., 274 U.S. 15 (1927)
  • Hoffman v. Missouri ex rel. Foraker, 274 U.S. 21 (1927)
  • Lowe v. Dickson, 274 U.S. 23 (1927)
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 29 (1927)
  • Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Stone Cutters, 274 U.S. 37 (1927)
  • Northern R. Co. v. Page, 274 U.S. 65 (1927)
  • Southern R. Co. v. Kentucky, 274 U.S. 76 (1927)
  • McDonald v. Maxwell, 274 U.S. 91 (1927)
  • American National Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 99 (1927)
  • United States ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 106 (1927)
  • Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Yeldell, 274 U.S. 112 (1927)
  • New York Dock Co. v. S. S. Poznan, 274 U.S. 117 (1927)
  • Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Swope, 274 U.S. 123 (1927)
  • Morris v. Duby, 274 U.S. 135 (1927)
  • FTC v. Klesner, 274 U.S. 145 (1927)
  • FTC v. Claire Furnace Co., 274 U.S. 160 (1927)
  • Kadow v. Paul, 274 U.S. 175 (1927)
  • Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 274 U.S. 181 (1927)
  • Road Improvement Dist. No. 1 of Franklin Cty. v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 274 U.S. 188 (1927)
  • Duignan v. United States, 274 U.S. 195 (1927)
  • Buck v. Bell
    Buck v. Bell
    Buck v. Bell, , was the United States Supreme Court ruling that upheld a statute instituting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the mentally retarded, "for the protection and health of the state." It was largely seen as an endorsement of negative eugenics—the attempt to improve...

    , 274 U.S. 200 (1927)
  • Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs, 274 U.S. 208 (1927)
  • Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 215 (1927)
  • Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220 (1927)
  • United States v. Stone & Downer Co., 274 U.S. 225 (1927)
  • Zimmermann v. Sutherland, 274 U.S. 253 (1927)
  • Westfall v. United States, 274 U.S. 256 (1927)
  • United States v. Sullivan, 274 U.S. 259 (1927)
  • United States v. Alford, 274 U.S. 264 (1927)
  • United States v. Sisal Sales Corp., 274 U.S. 268 (1927)
  • Deal v. United States, 274 U.S. 277 (1927)
  • Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Hall, 274 U.S. 284 (1927)
  • Alston v. United States, 274 U.S. 289 (1927)
  • United States v. Ludey, 274 U.S. 295 (1927)
  • St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Spiller, 274 U.S. 304 (1927)
  • Baltimore S. S. Co. v. Phillips, 274 U.S. 316 (1927)
  • Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U.S. 325 (1927)
  • Burns v. United States, 274 U.S. 328 (1927)
  • Phelps v. United States, 274 U.S. 341 (1927)
  • Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Idaho, 274 U.S. 344 (1927)
  • Hess v. Pawloski
    Hess v. Pawloski
    Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a statute designating the registrar of motor vehicles as agent for purpose of service of process for out-of-state non-resident motorists complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth...

    , 274 U.S. 352 (1927)
  • Whitney v. California
    Whitney v. California
    Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 , was a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the conviction of an individual who had engaged in speech that raised a threat to society.-Facts:...

    , 274 U.S. 357 (1927)
  • Fiske v. Kansas, 274 U.S. 380 (1927)
  • Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving Dist. No. 16 of City of Fort Smith, 274 U.S. 387 (1927)
  • Ohio ex rel. Clarke v. Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927)
  • United States v. S. S. White Dental Mfg. Co., 274 U.S. 398 (1927)
  • Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co., 274 U.S. 403 (1927)
  • Posados v. Manila, 274 U.S. 410 (1927)
  • Overland Motor Co. v. Packard Motor Co., 274 U.S. 417 (1927)
  • Messel v. Foundation Co., 274 U.S. 427 (1927)
  • Rhea v. Smith, 274 U.S. 434 (1927)
  • Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., 274 U.S. 445 (1927)
  • United States v. Freights, 274 U.S. 466 (1927)
  • Empire Trust Co. v. Cahan, 274 U.S. 473 (1927)
  • Biddle v. Perovich
    Biddle v. Perovich
    Biddle v. Perovich 274 U.S. 480 is a court case argued May 2, 1927. The Supreme Court of the United States decided the case May 31, 1927...

    , 274 U.S. 480 (1927)
  • New York v. Illinois, 274 U.S. 488 (1927)
  • Power Mfg. Co. v. Saunders, 274 U.S. 490 (1927)
  • Longest v. Langford, 274 U.S. 499 (1927)
  • Maul v. United States, 274 U.S. 501 (1927)
  • Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U.S. 531 (1927)
  • FTC v. American Tobacco Co, 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
  • Joines v. Patterson, 274 U.S. 544 (1927)
  • Clark v. Poor, 274 U.S. 554 (1927)
  • United States v. Lee
    United States v. Lee
    United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 , is a 5-to-4 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Constitution's prohibition on lawsuits against the federal government did not extend to officers of the government themselves. The case involved the heir of Mary Anna Custis Lee, wife of...

    , 274 U.S. 559 (1927)
  • The Assigned Car Cases, 274 U.S. 564 (1927)
  • Lawrence v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 274 U.S. 588 (1927)
  • Arkansas Railroad Comm'n v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 274 U.S. 597 (1927)
  • Gorieb v. Fox, 274 U.S. 603 (1927)
  • Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 611 (1927)
  • Stewart & Co. v. Rivara, 274 U.S. 614 (1927)
  • FTC v. Eastman Kodak Co., 274 U.S. 619 (1927)
  • Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Co. v. Brown, 274 U.S. 630 (1927)
  • Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. United States, 274 U.S. 640 (1927)
  • Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Wis., 274 U.S. 651 (1927)
  • Weedin v. Chin Bow, 274 U.S. 657 (1927)
  • Mayor of Vidalia v. McNeely, 274 U.S. 676 (1927)
  • Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co., 274 U.S. 684 (1927)
  • United States v. International Harvester Co., 274 U.S. 693 (1927)
The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK