List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 264

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

cases from volume 264 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:

Board of Trade of Chicago v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 1 (1924)
Barnett v. Kunkel, 264 U.S. 16 (1924)
Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. County of King, 264 U.S. 22 (1924)
Fleming v. Fleming, 264 U.S. 29 (1924)
Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32 (1924)
Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. Davis, 264 U.S. 47 (1924)
Standard Parts Co. v. Peck, 264 U.S. 52 (1924)
Edwards v. Slocum, 264 U.S. 61 (1924)
United States ex rel. St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. v. ICC, 264 U.S. 64 (1924)
Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Eastern Texas R. Co., 264 U.S. 79 (1924)
The "Gul Djemal", 264 U.S. 90 (1924)
Myers v. United States
Myers v. United States
Myers v. United States, , was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body....

, 264 U.S. 95 (1924)
Ex parte Transportes Maritimos do Estado, 264 U.S. 105 (1924)
Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 U.S. 109 (1924)
United States ex rel. Tisi v. Tod, 264 U.S. 131 (1924)
United States ex rel. Mensevich v. Tod, 264 U.S. 134 (1924)
Pierce Oil Corp. v. Hopkins, 264 U.S. 137 (1924)
Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140 (1924)
Sanguinetti v. United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924)
Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. New Orleans, 264 U.S. 150 (1924)
J. E. Raley & Brothers v. Richardson, 264 U.S. 157 (1924)
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Malloy, 264 U.S. 160 (1924)
Jones v. Union Guano Co., 264 U.S. 171 (1924)
Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co., 264 U.S. 182 (1924)
Guaranty Title & Trust Corp. v. United States, 264 U.S. 200 (1924)
United States v. State Investment Co., 264 U.S. 206 (1924)
Perkins-Campbell Co. v. United States, 264 U.S. 213 (1924)
Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co., 264 U.S. 219 (1924)
Matthew Addy Co. v. United States, 264 U.S. 239 (1924)
Erickson v. United States, 264 U.S. 246 (1924)
Manufacturers' Land & Improvement Co. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corporation, 264 U.S. 250 (1924)
Chicago Junction Case, 264 U.S. 258 (1924)
Smith v. Apple, 264 U.S. 274 (1924)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Czizek, 264 U.S. 281 (1924)
Dorchy v. Kansas, 264 U.S. 286 (1924)
Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292 (1924)
FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 264 U.S. 298 (1924)
First Nat. Bank of Columbus v. Louisiana Highway Comm'n, 264 U.S. 308 (1924)
Citizens Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Sexton, 264 U.S. 310 (1924)
Keller v. Adams-Campbell Co., 264 U.S. 314 (1924)
John E. Thropp's Sons Co. v. Seiberling, 264 U.S. 320 (1924)
Railroad Comm'n of Cal. v. Southern Pacific Co., 264 U.S. 331 (1924)
Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Nichols, 264 U.S. 348 (1924)
United States v. Gay, 264 U.S. 353 (1924)
Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty, 264 U.S. 359 (1924)
Dillingham v. McLaughlin, 264 U.S. 370 (1924)
Panama R. Co. v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 375 (1924)
Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas R. & S. S. Co., 264 U.S. 393 (1924)
Rodman v. Pothier, 264 U.S. 399 (1924)
Davis v. Portland Seed Co., 264 U.S. 403 (1924)
Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox, 264 U.S. 426 (1924)
Nyanza S. S. Co. v. Jahncke Dry Dock No. 1, 264 U.S. 439 (1924)
Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of United States of Mexico, 264 U.S. 440 (1924)
Chung Fook v. White
Chung Fook v. White
Chung Fook v. White, 264 U.S. 443 , was a landmark Supreme Court case. It was significant in that it marked the end of the era of strict plain meaning interpretation of statutes and the beginning of the looser American Rule that the intent of the law was more important than its text.A man did not...

, 264 U.S. 443 (1924)
United States v. Payne, 264 U.S. 446 (1924)
First Nat. Bank of Greeley v. Board of Comm'rs of County of Weld, 264 U.S. 450 (1924)
E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Davis, 264 U.S. 456 (1924)
Webster Elec. Co. v. Splitdorf Elec. Co., 264 U.S. 463 (1924)
Georgia v. Chattanooga, 264 U.S. 472 (1924)
McCurdy v. United States, 264 U.S. 484 (1924)
Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. Chisholm, 264 U.S. 488 (1924)
Meek v. Centre County Banking Co., 264 U.S. 499 (1924)
Jay Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan, 264 U.S. 504 (1924)
Southeastern Express Co. v. Robertson, 264 U.S. 535 (1924)
Southeastern Express Co. v. Robertson, 264 U.S. 541 (1924)
Chastleton Corp. v. Sinclair, 264 U.S. 543 (1924)
Hoffman v. McClelland, 264 U.S. 552 (1924)
Davis v. Cornwell, 264 U.S. 560 (1924)
United States v. Valante, 264 U.S. 563 (1924)
Oklahoma v. Texas, 264 U.S. 565 (1924)

The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.