List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 249
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

 cases from volume 249 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:
  • Harriman Nat. Bank of N. Y. v. Seldomridge, 249 U.S. 1 (1919)
  • Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co., 249 U.S. 12 (1919)
  • G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United States, 249 U.S. 34 (1919)
  • Panama R. Co. v. Bosse, 249 U.S. 41 (1919)
  • Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States, , was a United States Supreme Court decision that upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 and concluded that a defendant did not have a First Amendment right to express freedom of speech against the draft during World War I. Ultimately, the case established the "clear and present...

    , 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
  • Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, 249 U.S. 53 (1919)
  • Alaska Salmon Co. v. Alaska, 249 U.S. 62 (1919)
  • Withnell v. Ruecking Constr. Co., 249 U.S. 63 (1919)
  • Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Mfg. Co., 249 U.S. 72 (1919)
  • Whitehead v. Galloway, 249 U.S. 79 (1919)
  • United States v. Doremus, 249 U.S. 86 (1919)
  • Webb v. United States
    Webb v. United States
    Webb v. United States, 249 U.S. 96 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that prescriptions of narcotics for maintenance treatment was not within the discretion of physicians and thus not privileged under the Harrison Narcotics Act....

    , 249 U.S. 96 (1919)
  • L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co., 249 U.S. 100 (1919)
  • Lane v. Pueblo of Santa Rosa, 249 U.S. 110 (1919)
  • Ex parte Whitney Steamboat Corp., 249 U.S. 115 (1919)
  • North Pacific S. S. Co. v. Hall Brothers Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co., 249 U.S. 119 (1919)
  • Werk v. Parker, 249 U.S. 130 (1919)
  • Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern R. Co., 249 U.S. 134 (1919)
  • Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 249 U.S. 152 (1919)
  • Chicago Great Western R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U.S. 164 (1919)
  • New York Central R. Co. v. Porter, 249 U.S. 168 (1919)
  • Missouri & Arkansas Lumber & Mining Co. v. Greenwood Dist. of Sebastian Cty., 249 U.S. 170 (1919)
  • Richmond v. Bird, 249 U.S. 174 (1919)
  • Gilcrease v. McCullough, 249 U.S. 178 (1919)
  • Sugarman v. United States, 249 U.S. 182 (1919)
  • Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co. v. Collins Produce Co., 249 U.S. 186 (1919)
  • Seufert Brothers Co. v. United States, 249 U.S. 194 (1919)
  • Shaffer v. Howard, 249 U.S. 200 (1919)
  • New York v. New Jersey, 249 U.S. 202 (1919)
  • Frohwerk v. United States, 249 U.S. 204 (1919)
  • Debs v. United States
    Debs v. United States
    Debs v. United States, , was a United States Supreme Court decision that upheld the Espionage Act of 1917.Eugene V. Debs was an American labor and political leader and five-time Socialist Party of America candidate for the American Presidency...

    , 249 U.S. 211 (1919)
  • Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Leach, 249 U.S. 217 (1919)
  • South Dakota v. Collins, 249 U.S. 220 (1919)
  • Crocker v. Malley, 249 U.S. 223 (1919)
  • Public Util. Comm'n of Kan. v. Landon, 249 U.S. 236 (1919)
  • Gratiot County State Bank v. Johnson, 249 U.S. 246 (1919)
  • Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Richmond, 249 U.S. 252 (1919)
  • Board of Pub. Util. Comm'rs v. Manila Electric Railroad & Light Co., 249 U.S. 262 (1919)
  • Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. Arizona, 249 U.S. 265 (1919)
  • St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. St. Louis, 249 U.S. 269 (1919)
  • Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright, 249 U.S. 275 (1919)
  • United States v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal, 249 U.S. 296 (1919)
  • Miller v. McClain, 249 U.S. 308 (1919)
  • United States v. Purcell Envelope Co., 249 U.S. 313 (1919)
  • O'Pry v. United States, 249 U.S. 323 (1919)
  • Lane v. Darlington, 249 U.S. 331 (1919)
  • Capitol Transp. Co. v. Cambria Steel Co., 249 U.S. 334 (1919)
  • Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Smith, 249 U.S. 337 (1919)
  • United States v. Union Pacific R. Co., 249 U.S. 354 (1919)
  • Wise v. United States, 249 U.S. 361 (1919)
  • United States ex rel. Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367 (1919)
  • United States v. Gudger, 249 U.S. 373 (1919)
  • Matters v. Ryan, 249 U.S. 375 (1919)
  • Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U.S. 378 (1919)
  • Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. United States, 249 U.S. 385 (1919)
  • Standard Oil Co. v. Graves, 249 U.S. 389 (1919)
  • McKinley v. United States, 249 U.S. 397 (1919)
  • Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. Columbus, 249 U.S. 399 (1919)
  • Burr v. Columbus, 249 U.S. 415 (1919)
  • Chicago & Northwestern R. Co. v. Ochs, 249 U.S. 416 (1919)
  • Lake Erie & Western R. Co. v. State Pub. Util. Comm'n of Ill. ex rel. Cameron, 249 U.S. 422 (1919)
  • Board of Pub. Util. Comm'rs v. Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas, 249 U.S. 425 (1919)
  • Corn Products Refining Co. v. Eddy, 249 U.S. 427 (1919)
  • United States v. Laughlin, 249 U.S. 440 (1919)
  • Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. Opperman, 249 U.S. 448 (1919)
  • United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 249 U.S. 451 (1919)
  • Barbour v. Georgia, 249 U.S. 454 (1919)
  • J. E. Hathaway & Co. v. United States, 249 U.S. 460 (1919)
  • Ex parte Wagner, 249 U.S. 465 (1919)
  • Southern Pacific R. Co. v. Arizona, 249 U.S. 472 (1919)
  • Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co., 249 U.S. 479 (1919)
  • Moore v. United States, 249 U.S. 487 (1919)
  • Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 249 U.S. 490 (1919)
  • Brougham v. Blanton Mfg. Co., 249 U.S. 495 (1919)
  • Rand v. United States, 249 U.S. 503 (1919)
  • Perley v. North Carolina, 249 U.S. 510 (1919)
  • Gillis v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 249 U.S. 515 (1919)
  • United Railroads of San Francisco v. City and County of San Francisco, 249 U.S. 517 (1919)
  • Chalker v. Birmingham & Northwestern R. Co., 249 U.S. 522 (1919)
  • New Orleans & Northeastern R. Co. v. Scarlet, 249 U.S. 528 (1919)
  • Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. Co. v. Mullins, 249 U.S. 531 (1919)
  • Louisville & Jefferson Bridge Co. v. United States, 249 U.S. 534 (1919)
  • Darling v. Newport News, 249 U.S. 540 (1919)
  • Collett v. Adams, 249 U.S. 545 (1919)
  • Ex parte Tracy, 249 U.S. 551 (1919) (per curiam)
  • Raton Water Works Co. v. City of Raton, 249 U.S. 552 (1919)
  • Beaumont v. Prieto, 249 U.S. 554 (1919)
  • Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United States, 249 U.S. 557 (1919)
  • Standard Computing Scale Co. v. Farrell, 249 U.S. 571 (1919)
The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK