List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 243

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

cases from volume 243 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:

Tyrrell v. District of Columbia, 243 U.S. 1 (1917)
Wellsville Oil Co. v. Miller, 243 U.S. 6 (1917)
Bond v. Hume, 243 U.S. 15 (1917)
Union Nat. Bank v. McBoyle, 243 U.S. 26 (1917)
Bowersock v. Smith, 243 U.S. 29 (1917)
McCluskey v. Marysville & Northern R. Co., 243 U.S. 36 (1917)
Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co., 243 U.S. 40 (1917)
Raymond v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 243 U.S. 43 (1917)
In re Petition of Selling v. Radford, 243 U.S. 46 (1917)
New Mexico v. Lane, 243 U.S. 52 (1917)
Donohue v. Vosper, 243 U.S. 59 (1917)
Thomsen v. Cayser, 243 U.S. 66 (1917)
McDonald v. Mabee, 243 U.S. 90 (1917)
Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co., 243 U.S. 93 (1917)
Five Per Cent. Discount Cases, 243 U.S. 97 (1917)
Gannon v. Johnston, 243 U.S. 108 (1917)
Baker v. Schofield, 243 U.S. 114 (1917)
William R. Staats Co. v. Security Trust and Sav. Bank, 243 U.S. 121 (1917)
The S. S. Appam, 243 U.S. 124 (1917)
Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Farmers Mut. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157 (1917)
Owensboro v. Owensboro Water Works Co. of Owensboro, 243 U.S. 166 (1917)
New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U.S. 188 (1917)
Hawkins v. Bleakly, 243 U.S. 210 (1917)
Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U.S. 219 (1917)
Horn v. Mitchell, 243 U.S. 247 (1917)
Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co., 243 U.S. 251 (1917)
Rome Railway & Light Co. v. Floyd County, 243 U.S. 257 (1917)
Philadelphia & Reading R. Co. v. McKibbin, 243 U.S. 264 (1917)
Pennington v. Fourth Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, 243 U.S. 269 (1917)
Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co., 243 U.S. 273 (1917)
Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley R. Co., 243 U.S. 281 (1917)
Lie v. San Francisco & Portland S. S. Co., 243 U.S. 291 (1917)
Memphis Street R. Co. v. Moore, 243 U.S. 299 (1917)
McAllister v. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co., 243 U.S. 302 (1917)
St. Joseph & Grand Island R. Co. v. Moore, 243 U.S. 311 (1917)
United States v. Cress, 243 U.S. 316 (1917)
Wilson v. New, 243 U.S. 332 (1917)
Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389 (1917)
Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 412 (1917)
California v. Deseret Water, Oil & Irrigation Co., 243 U.S. 415 (1917)
Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. McWhirt, 243 U.S. 422 (1917)
Bunting v. Oregon
Bunting v. Oregon
Bunting v. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426 , is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a ten-hour work day. The trials of Bunting v. Oregon resulted in acceptance of a ten-hour workday for both men and women, but the state minimum-wage laws weren't changed until twenty years later...

, 243 U.S. 426 (1917)
United States v. Kenofskey, 243 U.S. 440 (1917)
Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 444 (1917)
Pullman Co. v. Knott, 243 U.S. 447 (1917)
United States v. Waller, 243 U.S. 452 (1917)
United States v. Rowell, 243 U.S. 464 (1917)
United States v. Ginsberg, 243 U.S. 472 (1917)
United States v. Gradwell, 243 U.S. 476 (1917)
Straus v. Victor Talking Machine Co., 243 U.S. 490 (1917)
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U.S. 502 (1917)
Marshall v. Gordon, 243 U.S. 521 (1917)
Oregon & California R. Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 549 (1917)
Hendersonville Light & Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Interurban R. Co., 243 U.S. 563 (1917)
United States v. Davis, 243 U.S. 570 (1917)
Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Lorick, 243 U.S. 572 (1917)
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Olivit Brothers, 243 U.S. 574 (1917)
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Carr, 243 U.S. 587 (1917)
Lott v. Pittman, 243 U.S. 588 (1917)
St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U.S. 592 (1917)
United States v. Morehead, 243 U.S. 607 (1917)
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Layton, 243 U.S. 617 (1917)
Wyoming v. Colorado
Wyoming v. Colorado
Wyoming v. Colorado is a set of court cases, all dealing with water distribution from the Laramie River. Petition for rehearing was granted which revised the original decision. A motion to dismiss was later denied....

, 243 U.S. 622 (1917)

The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.