• Cerecedo v. United States, 239 U.S. 1 (1915)
• Gegiow v. Uhl, 239 U.S. 3 (1915)
• Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Lueders, 239 U.S. 11 (1915)
• Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U.S. 14 (1915)
• United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Riefler, 239 U.S. 17 (1915)
• Steinfeld v. Zeckendorf, 239 U.S. 26 (1915)
• Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U.S. 31 (1915)
• Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33 (1915)
• Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. Stringham, 239 U.S. 44 (1915)
• Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Co., 239 U.S. 48 (1915)
• Pennsylvania Co. v. Donat, 239 U.S. 50 (1915)
• Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Devine, 239 U.S. 52 (1915)
• Stratton v. Stratton, 239 U.S. 55 (1915)
• City of New York v. Sage, 239 U.S. 57 (1915)
• La Roque v. United States, 239 U.S. 62 (1915)
• Anderson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co., 239 U.S. 69 (1915)
• United States v. Barnow, 239 U.S. 74 (1915)
• National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford, 239 U.S. 81 (1915)
• Parker v. Monroig, 239 U.S. 83 (1915)
• United States v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co., 239 U.S. 88 (1915)
• Gsell v. Insular Collector of Customs, 239 U.S. 93 (1915)
• Southern R. Co. v. Campbell, 239 U.S. 99 (1915)
• Provident Sav. Life Assurance Soc. v. Kentucky, 239 U.S. 103 (1915)
• United States v. Freeman, 239 U.S. 117 (1915)
• Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Mutual Light, Heat & Power Co., 239 U.S. 121 (1915)
• Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Baird, 239 U.S. 126 (1915)
• Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U.S. 134 (1915)
• Sui v. McCoy, 239 U.S. 139 (1915)
• Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144 (1915)
• Fireball Gas Tank & Illuminating Co. v. Commercial Acetylene Co., 239 U.S. 156 (1915)
• Porter v. Wilson, 239 U.S. 170 (1915)
• Heim v. McCall, 239 U.S. 175 (1915)
• Crane v. New York, 239 U.S. 195 (1915)
• Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Burnette, 239 U.S. 199 (1915)
• New Orleans-Belize Royal Mail & Central American S. S. Co. v. United States, 239 U.S. 202 (1915)
• Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. Leser, 239 U.S. 207 (1915)
• William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. United States, 239 U.S. 221 (1915)
• Johnson v. Wells Fargo & Co., 239 U.S. 234 (1915)
• O'Neill v. Leamer, 239 U.S. 244 (1915)
• Houck v. Little River Drainage Dist., 239 U.S. 254 (1915)
• Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co., 239 U.S. 268 (1915)
• Phoenix R. Co. v. Geary, 239 U.S. 277 (1915)
• Elzaburu v. Chaves, 239 U.S. 283 (1915)
• De Villanueva v. Villanueva, 239 U.S. 293 (1915)
• Mackenzie v. Hare, 239 U.S. 299 (1915)
• Town of Essex v. New England Telegraph Co. of Mass., 239 U.S. 313 (1915)
• Provo Bench Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Tanner, 239 U.S. 323 (1915)
• Weber v. Freed, 239 U.S. 325 (1915)
• Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Bigger, 239 U.S. 330 (1915)
• Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Swearingen, 239 U.S. 339 (1915)
• United States v. Normile, 239 U.S. 344 (1915)
• Great Northern R. Co. v. Otos, 239 U.S. 349 (1915)
• Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Koennecke, 239 U.S. 352 (1915)
• Christianson v. King County, 239 U.S. 356 (1915)
• Robert Moody & Son v. Century Savings Bank, 239 U.S. 374 (1915)
• Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U.S. 382 (1915)
• Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Glenn, 239 U.S. 388 (1915)
• Hadacheck v. Sebastian
  Hadacheck v. Sebastian
  Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance of Los Angeles, California prohibiting the manufacturing of bricks within specified limits of the city did not unconstitutionally deprive the petitioner of his property without...
  
  , 239 U.S. 394 (1915)
• Williams v. Johnson, 239 U.S. 414 (1915)
• Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Whiteaker, 239 U.S. 421 (1915)
• Miller v. Strahl, 239 U.S. 426 (1915)
• Ex parte Uppercu, 239 U.S. 435 (1915)
• Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Colo.
  Investment
  Investment has different meanings in finance and economics. Finance investment is putting money into something with the expectation of gain, that upon thorough analysis, has a high degree of security for the principal amount, as well as security of return, within an expected period of time...
  
  , 239 U.S. 441 (1915)
• Dayton Coal & Iron Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co., 239 U.S. 446 (1915)
• Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. Wagner, 239 U.S. 452 (1915)
• Inter-Island Steam Nav. Co. v. Byrne, 239 U.S. 459 (1915)
• Reese v. Philadelphia & Reading R. Co., 239 U.S. 463 (1915)
• United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien Gesellschaft, 239 U.S. 466 (1916)
• Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist., 239 U.S. 478 (1916)
• Northwestern Laundry v. Des Moines, 239 U.S. 486 (1916)
• Southern R. Co. v. Lloyd, 239 U.S. 496 (1916)
• Hapai v. Brown, 239 U.S. 502 (1916)
• Hallowell v. Commons, 239 U.S. 506 (1916)
• Seven Cases of Eckman's Alternative v. United States, 239 U.S. 510 (1916)
• Commercial Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., 520 (1916)
• United States v. Ross
  Ross
  Ross is a region of Scotland and a former mormaerdom, earldom, sheriffdom and county. The name Ross allegedly derives from a Gaelic word meaning a headland - perhaps a reference to the Black Isle. The Norse word for Orkney - Hrossay meaning horse island - is another possible origin. The area...
  
  , 239 U.S. 530 (1916)
• Moss v. Ramey, 239 U.S. 538 (1915)
• Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Wright, 239 U.S. 548 (1916)
• Shanks v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 239 U.S. 556 (1916)
• Interstate Amusement Co. v. Albert, 239 U.S. 560 (1916)
• Home Bond Co. v. McChesney, 239 U.S. 568 (1916)
• Kanawha & Michigan R. Co. v. Kerse, 239 U.S. 576 (1916)
• New York Central & H. R. R. Co. v. Gray, 239 U.S. 583 (1916)
• Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Dettlebach, 239 U.S. 588 (1916)
• Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Horton, 239 U.S. 595 (1916)
• Basso v. United States, 239 U.S. 602 (1916)
• White v. United States, 239 U.S. 608 (1916)
• Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Meese, 239 U.S. 614 (1916)
• Rogers v. Hennepin County, 239 U.S. 621 (1916)

External links