|
|
|
|
VNSA
|
| |
|
| |
VNSA is an abbreviation of violent non-state actor, and refers to any organization that uses illegal violence (force not officially approved of by the state) to reach its goals, thereby contesting the monopoly on violence of the (Westphalian) state.
Examples of VNSA's are: warlords, insurgents, para-militaries, liberation armies, freedom fighters, terrorists, militias, guerrillas, youth gangs, pirates, and criminal organizations like the Mafia or Yakuza. Relation to terrorism Whether some or all VNSAs are terrorist organizations depends on the applied definition of terrorism.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'VNSA'
Start a new discussion about 'VNSA'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
VNSA is an abbreviation of violent non-state actor, and refers to any organization that uses illegal violence (force not officially approved of by the state) to reach its goals, thereby contesting the monopoly on violence of the (Westphalian) state.
Examples of VNSA's are: warlords, insurgents, para-militaries, liberation armies, freedom fighters, terrorists, militias, guerrillas, youth gangs, pirates, and criminal organizations like the Mafia or Yakuza.
Relation to terrorism Whether some or all VNSAs are terrorist organizations depends on the applied definition of terrorism. ("One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter").
And vice versa, not all forms of terrorism are conducted by VNSA's (i.e. state terrorism).
Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those acts which:
- are intended to create fear (terror) among a broader public, and
- are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a materialistic goal or a lone attack), and
- deliberately target (or disregard the safety of) non-combatants.
Most VNSAs do not meet all three of these criteria, and therefore should not automatically be identified or associated with terrorism.
For instance: criminal organizations (like the Mafia, Yakuza, or Mara Salvatrucha) do not legitimize their strategies by referring to an ideological goal, and insurgents or liberation armies (like the EZLN) do not necessarily target non-combatants.
Origin and motives Some VNSAs (being non-state actors) are in one way or another sponsored by the state, or by local authorities (see also state-sponsored terrorism or para-militaries).
Most VNSAs however emerge in response to deficiencies, inadequacies, or shortcomings; i.e. when the state does not provide safety, security, (economic) stability and the basic public sevices for its citizens, or certain groups of citizens (minorities). When the state lacks legitimacy and/or capacity, others will fill the gap, take advantage, or directly confront the state. (see also Relative deprivation, Failed state and Fragile state)
Motives of VNSA's can be either mainly materialistic (like the Mafia), or mainly political (like the EZLN), ideological (like the Animal Rights Militia), or religious (like Al-Qaeda). In reality these distinctions are often not clear. Hamas for instance might be viewed by many as freedom fighters, but their strategy is pretty much terrorist, and their means of existence closely linked with mafia-like practice.
Diagnostic dimensions Instead of labelling an organization (for instance as terrorist or freedom fighters), a clearer picture of the nature of a VNSA can be provided by diagnosing an organisation by dimensions; for example by asking the following questions:
- How do they legitimize themselves? (by political ideology, ethnicity, nationality, religion, functionality)
- Which societal gaps does a VNSA fill? (safety/security, (economic) stability, social participatian, public services)
- To what extent do they have support from outside? (local, regional, national, international)
- What is the scope of influence? (local, regional, national, international)
- Among which population groups or what indicators they recrute on? (age, religious, political, class, ethnicity)
- Where do they recruit? (local, regional, national, international)
- How do they recruit? (ideological i.e. empowerment, bribary, intimidation and violence, kidnapping)
- To what extent are they infiltrated in (local or national) government and business (corruption)?
- Are they involved in organized crime? (weapon trade, drug trade, trade in humans, money-laundering)
- How is the organisation structured? (hierarchical or democratic, central or diffused network)
- How has their focus and strategy changed over time (generations)? (more violent or more diplomatic, more international)
See also
|
| |
|
|