|
|
|
|
Susan Haack
|
| |
|
| |
Susan Haack (born 1945, England) is an English professor of philosophy and law at the University of Miami in the United States. She has written on logic, the philosophy of language, epistemology, and metaphysics. Her pragmatism follows that of Charles Peirce.
k is a graduate of the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge. At Oxford, she studied at St. Hilda's College, where her first philosophy teacher was Jean Austin, the widow of J. L. Austin. She also studied Plato with Gilbert Ryle and logic with Michael Dummett. David Pears supervised her B.Phil.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Susan Haack' Start a new discussion about 'Susan Haack' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
Susan Haack (born 1945, England) is an English professor of philosophy and law at the University of Miami in the United States. She has written on logic, the philosophy of language, epistemology, and metaphysics. Her pragmatism follows that of Charles Peirce.
Career
Haack is a graduate of the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge. At Oxford, she studied at St. Hilda's College, where her first philosophy teacher was Jean Austin, the widow of J. L. Austin. She also studied Plato with Gilbert Ryle and logic with Michael Dummett. David Pears supervised her B.Phil. dissertation on ambiguity. At Cambridge, she wrote her Ph.D. under the supervision of Timothy Smiley. She held the positions of Fellow of New Hall, Cambridge and professor of philosophy at the University of Warwick before taking her current position at the University of Miami.
Ideas
Haack's major contribution to philosophy is her epistemological theory called foundherentism, which is her attempt to avoid the logical problems of both pure foundationalism (which is susceptible to infinite regress) and pure coherentism (which is susceptible to circularity). She illustrates this idea with the metaphor of the crossword puzzle. A highly simplified version of this proceeds as follows: Finding an answer using a clue is analogous to a foundational source (grounded in empirical evidence). Making sure that the interlocking words are mutually sensible is analogous to justification through coherence. Both are necessary components in the justification of knowledge.
She wrote a play, We Pragmatists ...: Peirce and Rorty in Conversation, comprised entirely of quotes from both philosophers. She performed the role of Peirce. Haack published a vigorous in the New Criterion, taking strong exception to many of Rorty's views, especially his claim to be a sort of pragmatist.
Haack (1998) is highly critical of the view that there is a feminine perspective on reasoning, logic, scientific method, and scientific truth. However, in her objections to feminist epistemology, she often represents feminist critiques of science and philosophy as being concerned that the outcomes of scientific inquiry be "politically correct".
She has written for Free Inquiry magazine and the "Council for Secular Humanism". Haack's work has been reviewed and cited in the popular press, such as the The Times Literary Supplement as well as in academic journals.
Memberships
Haack is an honorary member of Phi Beta Kappa Society and Phi Kappa Phi, a past President of the Charles S. Peirce Society, and a past member of the U.S./UK Educational Commission.
Select Writings by Haack
- 1974. Deviant Logic.
- 1978. Philosophy of Logics.
- 1993, Evidence and Inquiry.
- 1997, "" The New Criterion 16.
- 1998. Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays.
- 2003. Defending Science: Within Reason Between Scientism and Cynicism. ISBN 1-59102-117-0).
- 2005, "," American Journal of Public Health.
- 2006 (edited with Robert Lane). Pragmatism, Old and New.
- 2008. Putting Philosophy to Work: Inquiry and Its Place in Culture
External links
|
| |
|
|
