|
|
|
|
Seal of the Prophets
|
| |
|
| |
Seal of the Prophets ( Khatim an-Nabiyyin) is a title given to Muhammad by a verse in the Qur'an. Muslims traditionally interpret this verse as meaning that Muhammad was the last prophet.
is claims to quote the Hadith of Umar and prophecy as proof of Muhammad being the last prophet, while both Shi‘i and Sunni Muslims quote the Hadith of position.
Islamic commentators agree that "messenger" (rasul) refers to those who bring a divine revelation which includes a new doctrinal system, while a "prophet" (nabi) is one who explains ethical teachings on the basis of an existing religion.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Seal of the Prophets' Start a new discussion about 'Seal of the Prophets' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
Seal of the Prophets ( Khatim an-Nabiyyin) is a title given to Muhammad by a verse in the Qur'an. Muslims traditionally interpret this verse as meaning that Muhammad was the last prophet.
Hadith
Sunnis claims to quote the Hadith of Umar and prophecy as proof of Muhammad being the last prophet, while both Shi‘i and Sunni Muslims quote the Hadith of position.
Distinction between "messenger" and "prophet"
Most Islamic commentators agree that "messenger" (rasul) refers to those who bring a divine revelation which includes a new doctrinal system, while a "prophet" (nabi) is one who explains ethical teachings on the basis of an existing religion. Every messenger is a prophet, but not every prophet is an apostle.
Academic view
According to A.C. Welch, Muslim interpretation of khatim an-nabiyyin as the "last and greatest of the prophets" is most likely based on a later interpretation. Carl Ernst considers this phrase to mean that Muhammad's “imprint on history is as final as a wax seal on a letter”. Wilferd Madelung states that the meaning of this term is not certain.
Views of Islam and Islam deviant sects
Islamic interpretations
A majority of Salafi and Sunni scholars have adhered to the view that khatam means last. Ibn Kathir in his commentary states.
Hence this verse is a clear proof of the fact that no prophet will come after Muhammad and when it is said that no prophet will come after him it is a foregone conclusion that no messenger will succeed him either.
Imam Raghib, the twelfth century Islamic philosopher has argued in favour of the possibility of non-law bearing prophethood, he states:
“ Prophethood is of two kinds, general and special. The special prophethood, viz: the law-bearing prophethood is now unattainable; but the general prophethood continues to be attainable.” (Bahr al Muheet, vol. 3, p. 28)
Muhammad Qasim Nanotwi, the founder of Deoband seminary seems to conform to the sufi idea of finality. He writes,
According to the layman, the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings on him, being Khatam is supposed to have appeared after all the other prophets. But men of understanding and the wise know it very well that being the first or the last, chronologically, does not carry any weight. How could, therefore, the words of the Holy Qur'an “'But he is the messenger of Allah and the Seal of Prophets” (33.40) mean to glorify him? But I know very well that none from among the Muslims would be prepared to agree with the common men.
Maulana Qasim Nanotwi further writes,
“In short, if the meaning of the word Finality is accepted as explained, then his Finality of Prophethood will not be exclusively attached to the past Prophet. But even if for instance another Prophet appeared during the era of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) then too, him being the Final Prophet remains intact as normal.”
He goes even further and says,
“If for instance even after the era of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) any Prophet is born, then too it will not make any difference to the Finality of Prophethood of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).”
Despite the more non-conformist stance taken by Nanutuwi, most Deoband scholars have take a more simplitic view of this concept.
The Barelvi sect of Sunni Islam has, however, criticised the Deoband school of denying the finality of prophethood on the basis of the writings of their leader.
Ahmadiyya view
In recent history, the interpretation of the term “seal of the prophets” has been a cause of much contention between the traditional Islam and the Ahmadiyya movement. The differences arose due to differences in the definition and usage of the terms “seal” and “prophet”.
The two branches of the Ahmadiyya movement differ in their interpretation of this term.
The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community while accepting Muhammad as the 'seal of Prophets' and the last prophet to have brought a complete and comprehensive universal law for humanity, believe that prophethood subordinate to Muhammad is still open. Muhammad is believed to have brought prophethood to perfection and was the last law-bearing prophet, the apex of man's spiritual evolution. New prophets can come but they must be subordinate to Muhammad and cannot exceed him in excellence nor alter his teaching or bring any new law or religion. The Ahmadiyya community believes Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be the promised Messiah and Mahdi, who claimed a certain kind of prophethood but never claimed to have brought a new divine law or change the law of Muhammad, but to have been Divinely appointed to revive and universally establish the law/religion of Muhammad. The Ahmadiyya community draws upon various opinions of Islamic scholars throughout the history of Islam to show the possibility of non-law bearing prophethood within Islam. In contrast the Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement believes that Muhammad was the last prophet and no new or old prophet can come after him, though they too believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be the promised Messiah and Mahdi
Bahá'í view
The Bahá'í Faith regards Muhammad as the seal of the prophets, but does not interpret this term as meaning that no further messengers from God are possible. In particular, Bahá'ís regard the end-times prophecies of Islam (and other faiths) as being symbolic, and see the Báb and Bahá'u'lláh as symbolically fulfilling these prophetic expectations. The latter of these is the founder of the Bahá'í religion, which considers Islamic law to have been superseded by its own. Muhammad is seen as ending the Adamic cycle, also known as the Prophetic cycle, which is stated to have begun approximately 6,000 years ago, and the Báb and Bahá'u'lláh as starting the Bahá'í cycle, or Cycle of Fulfillment, which will last at least five hundred thousand years with numerous Manifestations of God appearing throughout that time. Bahá'u'lláh gave the Title “King of the Messengers” (sultán al-rusul) to the Báb, and the “Sender of the Messengers” (mursil al-rusul) to himself. In the Kitáb-i-Íqán, he uses the Islamic concept of the oneness of the prophets to show that the term “seal of the prophets” does not apply to Muhammad only, but to all the prophets. He als makes a direct link between Qur'án 33:40, about the seal of the prophets, and , about the promise of the "attainment of the divine Presence" on the day of resurrection, which he interprets as the meeting with the Manifestation of God. The day of resurrection is interpreted as the day of the advent of the Qa'im These interpretive and legal differences have caused the Bahá'ís to be seen as heretics and apostates by many Muslims.
Non Islamic & Modernist Sufism
The end-times prophecies of Islam point to a mahdi and those of Christianity to a messiah. That Muhammad calls himself the Seal of the prophets deals with the fact that any true prophet who arose would know of Muhammad's mission and bring out his true status and identity. The case of Uwais al-Qarni who was given Muhammed's mantle after his death in 632 was because this was given to him as his successor. It is because Elijah is the Seal of the prophets that Muhammad called himself the “last prophet” and other things to illustrate that he wore the Mantle of Prophecy: he was carrying out God's will as one having been “instructed” by Gabriel who also instructed Zacharias and Mary. Distinct from these, Muhammad's mission dealt with the fact that the Qur'an is at the same time the Curse of God upon Israel, and the Blessing of God upon Ishmael as Bani-Israel (or the “New Israel”). The arrival of the Messiah at the end can be better understood if one realizes that the Messiah will have his messenger who is “much more than a prophet”, as Jesus Christ called him. This was John the Baptist's status as the 'friend of the Bridegroom'. He was the Messenger of Jehovah of hosts, as is written about in : “For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth; for he is the messenger of Jehovah of hosts.”
In the Sufic philosophy it is as Muhammad once said in comparing external and internal struggle; to wit, “The ink of the Learned is holier than the blood of the martyr”.
Most commonly held view about the phrase Seal of Prophets is that “seal” means finality and end.
A small minority of scholars have translated and interpreted the word Seal in terms of honour and superiority. The vast majority of scholars from all sects of Islam accept that the only correct interpretation of the word 'khatam' is its literal meaning of 'final, last, seal' .
Mawlana Rumi in his famous Mathnawi writes ,
He has been raised to the station of Khatam by the grace of God. There can never be his like before him or after.
When a master excels all others in his art, don’t you use the word ‘khatam’ to convey the idea that he has excelled all others in his domain?
and
“Make such plans to perform righteousness in the way of God that you attain prophethood within the Ummat (religious community)”
(Mathnavi Maulana Room, Daftar I, pg. 53)
Ibn Arabi also followed the same line of reasoning in his . He has even argued that possibility of a subordinate prophet is open according to the verse 33:40. He has stated:
“That prophethood which ended with the advent of the Prophet (peace be upon him), is only law-bearing prophethood and not the status of prophethood. Thus now there will be no law that cancels the law of the Prophet (peace be upon him) or that adds to its commandments.”
(Fatoohaat al-Makkiyyah, Vol. 2, p. 3)
and
“From the study and contemplation of the Darud we have arrived at the definite conclusion that there shall, from among the Muslims, certainly be persons whose status, in the matter of prophethood, shall advance to the level of prophets, if Allah pleases. But they shall not be given any book of law.”
Fatuhati Makiyyah: Vol 1. pg 545
Hazrat Imam Abu Ja'far Sadiq, the sixth Shia Imam, while discussing the Quranic verse: “For verily We granted the Book to the children of Abraham. …”, said that:
“God vouchsafed to the children of Abraham, Messengers, Prophets and Imams. But what is ironical is that people believe in what God blessed the children of Abraham with and yet they deny this blessing for the progeny of Muhammad.”
Al-Saafi Sharah Asool Al-Kaafi, Part 3, Pg. 119
Hazrat Shah Wali Ullah Muhaddith of Dehli subscribed to the opinion:
“The meaning of the Holy Prophet being the Khataman Nabiyeen is that there shall not now appear a person whom God may appoint with a new Law for mankind, that is to say, there shall be no prophet who shall come with a new Law.”
(Tafheemati Ilahiyyah pg. 53)
and
“There cannot be an independent prophet after the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, who is not his follower and his adherent.”
(Al Khairul Katheer: pg 111)
Hazrat Maulana Faranghi Mahal, an eminent scholar of the Ahle Sunnat also discussed the significance of the expression Khatamae Nubuwwat and on behalf of the Sunni Scholars, he declared:
“The divines of the Sunni sects believe in and expound the fact that in the course of the Ministry of the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, there cannot appear a law bearing prophet and his prophethood extends to the end of days. A prophet who appears during his ministry shall necessarily be the follower of the Law of Muhammad.”'
(Majmu'ah Fatawa: Vol. 1, pg 144)
See also
External links
|
| |
|
|
