|
|
|
|
Plum pudding model
|
| |
|
| |
The plum pudding model of the atom by J.J. Thomson, who discovered the electron in 1897, was proposed in 1904 before the discovery of the atomic nucleus. In this model, the atom is composed of electrons (which Thomson still called "corpuscles," though G.J.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Plum pudding model' Start a new discussion about 'Plum pudding model' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
The plum pudding model of the atom by J.J. Thomson, who discovered the electron in 1897, was proposed in 1904 before the discovery of the atomic nucleus. In this model, the atom is composed of electrons (which Thomson still called "corpuscles," though G.J. Stoney had proposed that atoms of electricity be called electrons in 1894)
, surrounded by a soup of positive charge to balance the electron's negative charge, like negatively-charged "plums" surrounded by positively-charged "pudding". The electrons (as we know them today) were thought to be positioned throughout the atom, but with many structures possible for positioning multiple electrons, particularly rotating rings of electrons (see below). Instead of a soup, the atom was also sometimes said to have had a cloud of positive charge.
The model was disproved by the 1909 gold foil experiment, which was interpreted by Ernest Rutherford in 1911 to imply a very small nucleus of the atom containing a very high positive charge (enough to balance about 100 electrons in gold), thus leading to the Rutherford model of the atom, and finally (after Henry Moseley's work showed in 1913 that the nuclear charge was very close to the atomic number) to the Antonius Van den Broek suggestion that atomic number is nuclear charge. Eventually, by 1913, this work had culminated in the solar-system-like (but quantum-limited) Bohr model of the atom, in which a nucleus containing an atomic number of positive charge is surrounded by an equal number of electrons in orbital shells.
Thomson's model was compared (though not by Thomson) to a British treat called plum pudding, hence the name. It has also been called the chocolate chip cookie model or blueberry muffin model, but these mental pictures assume the particles as static, which they were not for Thomson.
Thomson's paper was published in the March 1904 edition of the Philosophical Magazine, the leading British science journal of the day. In Thompson's view:
... the atoms of the elements consist of a number of negatively electrified corpuscles enclosed in a sphere of uniform positive electrification, ...
In this model, the electrons were free to rotate within the blob or cloud of positive substance. These orbits were stabilized in the model by the fact that when an electron moved farther from the center of the positive cloud, it felt a larger net positive inward force, because there was more material of opposite charge, inside its orbit (see Gauss's law). In Thomson's model, electrons were free to rotate in rings which were further stabilized by interactions between the electrons, and spectra were to be accounted for by energy differences of different ring orbits. Thomson attempted to make his model account for some of the major spectral lines known for some elements, but was not notably successful at this. Still, Thomson's model (along with a similar Saturnian ring model for atomic electrons, put forward also in 1904 by Nagaoka after the Maxwell model of Saturn's rings), were earlier harbingers of the later and more successful solar-system-like Bohr model of the atom.
See also
|
| |
|
|
