All Topics  
Pascal's theorem

 

   Email Print
   Bookmark   Link

 

Pascal's theorem


 
 

In projective geometryProjective geometry

Projective geometry is a non-metrical form of geometry that emerged in the early 19th century....
, Pascal's theorem (aka Hexagrammum Mysticum Theorem) states that if an arbitrary hexagonHexagon

In geometry, a hexagon is a polygon with six edges and six vertices....
 is inscribed in any conic sectionConic section

In mathematics, a conic section is a curve that can be formed by intersecting a cone with a plane....
, and opposite pairs of sideSide

Side was an ancient maritime city of Pamphylia, about 16 km from Seleucia; it currently lies on the southern coast near the ...
s are extended until they meet, the three intersectionLine-line intersection

In Euclidean geometry, the intersection of a line and a line can be the empty set,...
 points will lie on a straight line, the Pascal line of that configuration. In the Euclidean plane, the theorem has exceptions; its natural home is the projective planeReal projective plane

In mathematics, the real projective plane is the space of lines in R3 passing through the origin....
.

This theorem is a generalization of Pappus's hexagon theoremPappus's hexagon theorem

Pappus's hexagon theorem states that given one set of collinear points A, B, C, and another set of collinear poi...
, and the projective dual of Brianchon's theoremBrianchon's theorem

In geometry, Brianchon's theorem, named after Charles Julien Brianchon, is as follows....
. It was discovered by Blaise PascalBlaise Pascal

Blaise Pascal was a French mathematician, physicist, and religious philosopher....
 when he was only 16 years old.

The theorem was generalized by Möbius in 1847, as follows: suppose a polygon with 4n + 2 sides is inscribed in a conic section, and opposite pairs of sides are extended until they meet in 2n + 1 points. Then if 2n of those points lie on a common line, the last point will be on that line, too.

The simplest proof for Pascal's theorem is via Menelaus' theoremMenelaus' theorem

Menelaus' theorem, attributed to Menelaus of Alexandria, is a theorem about triangles in plane geometry....
.

Proof of Pascal's theorem

The following proof will actually be just for a single unit circle in the projective plane, but a conic section can be turned into a circle by application of a projective transformationProjective transformation

A projective transformation is a transformation used in projective geometry: it is the composition of a pair of perspective projec...
, and since projective transformations preserve incidence properties, then the proof of the circular version should imply the truth of the theorem for ellipses, hyperbolas, and parabolas. Ellipses in particular can be turned into circles by a rescaling of the plane along either the major or minor axis, and a circle of any size can be turned into a unit circle by simultaneous and proportional rescaling of both the x- and y-axes.

Let P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 be a set of six points on a unit circle of a projective plane, with the following homogeneous coordinates:
.
Pascal's theorem then states that the three points which are the intersections of: (1) lines P1P2 and P4P5, (2) lines P2P3 and P5P6, and (3) lines P3P4 and P6P1, are collinear.

Symbolically, this can be stated as:
or using the notation <,,> for the scalar triple productTriple product

In vector calculus, there are two ways of multiplying three vectors together, to make a triple product. ...
:

Let
Then the objective is to show that G = 0.

First step

Apply the following identity of vector calculusVector calculus

Vector calculus is a field of mathematics concerned with multivariate real analysis of vectors in two or more dimensions....
:
to produce


Third step

LemmaLemma (mathematics)

In mathematics, a lemma is a proven proposition which is used as a stepping stone to a larger result rather than an independ...
 One.
If Pi, Pj, Pk are points on a unit circle in a projective plane and are expressed in homogeneous coördinates like so:
then

This lemma will be proved below, later. Meanwhile, applying it to the target, and letting
for ? , the target becomes


Fourth step

The target's sum has four terms, each one a product of twelve Sij′s out of 15 possible ones.

For each Sij, if i > j then replace it with its equivalent −Sji. Then, for any pair of adjacent Sij Skl in each product, commute them if i > k or if i=k but j > l. The result is



The Sij factors which are raised to the zeroth power denote factors which are actually missing.

Fifth step

Let

Then the target becomes

Seventh step

Lemma Two:

Using Sij notation, Lemma Two becomes

which when applied to the target yields

Replace S53 with −S35, resulting in




quod erat demonstrandum.

Proof of Lemma One







Applying the trigonometric identity
results in

Lemma Three:




Applying Lemma Three yields



quod erat demonstrandum.

Proof of Lemma Two

Since

and letting

then







so that





quod erat demonstrandum.

Proof of Lemma Three
























quod erat demonstrandum.

External links

  • at cut-the-knotCut-the-knot

    cut-the-knot is an educational website maintained by Alexander Bogomolny and devoted to popular exposition of a great variet...
  • at cut-the-knotCut-the-knot Overview

    cut-the-knot is an educational website maintained by Alexander Bogomolny and devoted to popular exposition of a great variet...
  • applying Menelaus’ Theorem