|
|
|
|
Nasadiya Sukta
|
| |
|
| |
The Nasadiya Sukta (after the incipit "not the non-existent") is the 129th hymn of the 10th Mandala of the Rigveda. It is concerned with cosmology and talks about the origin of the universe. It is an important example for the emergence of Advaita (Non-dualistic) thought in the Vedic period of India.
onsists of seven trishtubhs, although pada 7b is defective, being two syllables short,
- "if he has created it; or if not [...]"
Brereton (1999) argues that the defect is a conscious device employed by the rishi to express puzzlement at the possibility that the world may not be created, parallel to the syntactic defect of pada 7d, which ends in a subordinate clause without a governing clause:
- "he verily knows; or if he does not know [...]"
hymn has attracted a large body of literature of commentaries both in Indian theology and in Western philology.
It begins by paradoxically stating "not the non-existent existed, nor did the existent exist then" (), paralleled in verse 2 by "then not death existed, nor the immortal" ().

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Nasadiya Sukta'
Start a new discussion about 'Nasadiya Sukta'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
The Nasadiya Sukta (after the incipit "not the non-existent") is the 129th hymn of the 10th Mandala of the Rigveda. It is concerned with cosmology and talks about the origin of the universe. It is an important example for the emergence of Advaita (Non-dualistic) thought in the Vedic period of India.
Metre
It consists of seven trishtubhs, although pada 7b is defective, being two syllables short,
- "if he has created it; or if not [...]"
Brereton (1999) argues that the defect is a conscious device employed by the rishi to express puzzlement at the possibility that the world may not be created, parallel to the syntactic defect of pada 7d, which ends in a subordinate clause without a governing clause:
- "he verily knows; or if he does not know [...]"
Interpretations
The hymn has attracted a large body of literature of commentaries both in Indian theology and in Western philology.
It begins by paradoxically stating "not the non-existent existed, nor did the existent exist then" (), paralleled in verse 2 by "then not death existed, nor the immortal" (). But already in verse 2 mention is made that there was "breathing without breath, of its own nature, that one" ). In verse 3, being unfolds, "from great heat (tapas) was born that one" (). Verse 4 mentions desire (kama) as the primal seed, and the first poet-seers (kavayas) who "found the bond of being within non-being with their heart's thought".
Brereton (1999) argues that the reference to the sages searching for being in their spirit is central, and that the hymn's gradual procession from non-being to being in fact re-enacts creation within the listener (see ), equating poetic utterance and creation (see sabda).
The hymn is undoubtedly late within the Rigveda, and expresses thought more typical of later (mid 1st millennium BC) Indian philosophy, and it has been suspected of being intended as a polemic against the Samkhya school.
The hymn has been interpreted as one of the earliest accounts of skeptical inquiry and agnosticism.
"The One" repeatedly discussed in the Rigveda has been suggested to have originally referred to the axis mundi, and "The One who dwells beyond the seven sages" (1.164) as the polar star (at the time perhaps Thuban).
RV 10.130
The hymn that immediately follows (10.130) deals with the origin of sacrifice and similarly refers to a creator figure, "the Man", identified with Prajapati by Sayana
The hymn contemplates the first sacrifice performed by human worshippers who by the act were elevated to rishis, alluding to the mythical first sacrifice performed by the gods described in the Purusha Sukta (RV 10.90)
Verse 6 (trans. Griffith):
- So by this knowledge men were raised to Rsis, when ancient sacrifice sprang up, our Fathers.
- With the mind's eye I think that I behold them who first performed this sacrificial worship.
The questions in verse 3, "What were the rule, the order and the model? What were the wooden fender and the butter?" refer back to the questions in 10.129 (5b "what was above it then, and what below it?" etc.)
Further reading
- Joel P. Brereton, Edifying Puzzlement: 10. 129 and the Uses of Enigma, Journal of the American Oriental Society (1999)
- P. T. Raju, The Development of Indian Thought, Journal of the History of Ideas (1952)
- Karel Werner, Symbolism in the Vedas and Its Conceptualisation, Numen (1977)
See also
|
| |
|
|