|
|
|
|
Local extinction
|
| |
|
| |
Local extinction is where a species (or other taxon) ceases to exist in the chosen area of study, but still exists elsewhere. This phenomenon is also known as extirpation. Local extinctions are contrasted with global extinctions.
Local extinctions may be followed by a replacement of the species taken from other locations; wolf reintroduction is an example of this.
Conservation Local extinctions mark a change in the ecology of an area.
The area of study chosen may reflect a natural subpopulation, political boundaries, or both.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Local extinction'
Start a new discussion about 'Local extinction'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Local extinction is where a species (or other taxon) ceases to exist in the chosen area of study, but still exists elsewhere. This phenomenon is also known as extirpation. Local extinctions are contrasted with global extinctions.
Local extinctions may be followed by a replacement of the species taken from other locations; wolf reintroduction is an example of this.
Conservation Local extinctions mark a change in the ecology of an area.
The area of study chosen may reflect a natural subpopulation, political boundaries, or both. The Cetacean Specialist Group of the IUCN has assessed the threat of a local extinction of the Black Sea stock of Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) which touches six different countries. COSWIC, by contrast, investigate wildlife only in Canada, so assesses only the risk of a Canadian local extinction even for species which cross into the United States or other countries. Other subpopulations may be naturally divided by political or country boundaries.
Often a subpopulation of a species will also be a subspecies. For example, the recent disappearance of the Black Rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) from Cameroon spells not only the local extinction of rhinoceroses in Cameroon, but also the global extinction of the Western Black Rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis longipes).
In at least one case, scientists have found a local extinction useful for research: In the case of the Bay Checkerspot, scientists, including Paul R. Ehrlich, chose not to intervene in a local extinction, using it to study the danger to the world population However, similar studies are not carried out where a global population is at risk.
IUCN subpopulation and stock assessments
While the World Conservation Union (IUCN) mostly only categorizes whole species or subspecies, assessing the global risk of extinction, in some cases it also assesses the risks to stocks and populations, especially to preserve genetic diversity. In all, 119 stocks or subpopulations across 69 species have been assessed by the IUCN in 2006.
Examples of stocks and populations assessed by the IUCN for the threat of local extinction:
- Marsh Deer (three subpopulations assessed)
- Blue Whale, North Pacific stock and North Atlantic stock
- Bowhead Whale, Balaena mysticetus (five subpopulations assessed), from Critically Endangered to LR/cd
- Lake Sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, Mississippi & Missouri Basins subpopulation assessed as Vulnerable
- Wild Common carp, Cyprinus carpio (River Danube subpopulation)
- Black-footed Rock Wallaby Petrogale lateralis (MacDonnell Ranges subpopulation and Western Kimberly subpopulation)
The IUCN also lists countries where assessed species, subspecies or subpopulations are found, and from which countries they have been extirpated or reintroduced.
The IUCN has only three entries for subpopulations which have become extinct the Aral Sea stock of Ship sturgeon (Acipenser nudiventris); the Adriatic Sea stock of Beluga (Huso huso); and the Mexican subpopulation of Wolf (Canis lupus) which is extinct in the wild. No plant or fungi subpopulations have been assessed by the IUCN.
Local extinction events Major environmental events, such as volcanic eruptions, may lead to large numbers of local extinctions, such as with the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption, which led to a fern spike.
Metapopulation 'Metapopulation' is a concept in population biology that involves frequent local extinction (extirpation) and recolonization as part of a natural process. A metapopulation consists of a group of patches of suitable habitat, some of which have a species present and others do not. These small populations may fail, and eventually be recolonized by immigrants from other patches. This complex immigration/extinction dynamic allows metapopulations to thrive where individual habitat patches are too small to permanently sustain a population. This is in contrast to most cases of habitat fragmentation into patches, or worse, local extinction because recolonization or sufficient immigration is unlikely. When habitat become fragmented through development, succession, etc., the patches may become too small to sustain a healthy population, however migration between patches is difficult. Thus, there would be little chance of recolonization, as in a metapopulation, and local extinction would be a serious problem, rather than an natural fluctuation in a healthy larger population.
See also
External links
|
| |
|
|