|
|
|
|
Heliaia
|
| |
|
| |
Heliaia or Heliaea(Greek: ) (Doric: Halia) was the supreme court of ancient Athens. ?he generally held scientific view is that the court drew its name from the ancient Greek verb , which means , namely congregate. Another version is that the court took its name from the fact that the hearings were taking place outdoors, under the sun. Heliaia was also called big ecclesia. Initially, this was the name of the place where the hearings were convoked, but later this appellation included the court as well.
The judges were called heliasts or dikasts ( = those who have sworn, namely the jurors).
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Heliaia' Start a new discussion about 'Heliaia' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
Heliaia or Heliaea(Greek: ) (Doric: Halia) was the supreme court of ancient Athens. ?he generally held scientific view is that the court drew its name from the ancient Greek verb , which means , namely congregate. Another version is that the court took its name from the fact that the hearings were taking place outdoors, under the sun. Heliaia was also called big ecclesia. Initially, this was the name of the place where the hearings were convoked, but later this appellation included the court as well.
The judges were called heliasts or dikasts ( = those who have sworn, namely the jurors). The operation of judging was called .
Institution and composition of Heliaia
It is not clear whether Heliaia was instituted by Cleisthenes or Solon, but it seems that the latter initiated a function of the Assembly to sit as an appeals court. The court comprised 6.000 members, chosen annually by the lotamong all the male citizens over 30 years old, unless they were in debt to the Treasury or disfranchised, namely deprived of their civil rights through the humiliating punishment of atimia . Those suffering from intellectual or corporeal flaws were also excepted, if their shortages prevented them from fully perceiving the proceedings. If any unqualified person participated in a jury, then information was laid against him and he was brought before the Heliaia. If convicted the court could assess against him whatever punishment or fine he is thought to deserve. If the punishment was a money fine, then the infringer had to go to prison until he had paid both the former debt, for which the information was laid, and whatever additional sum had been imposed on him as a fine by the court.
Appointment of the jurymen
The public office of the heliast was not obligatory, but the citizens who wished to exert these duties ought to submit a petition. The post of the dikast was salaried and, thereby, the jurors were remunerated for each day of employment with one obolus and later, after the death of Kleon in 425 BC with three oboluses, namely 3 ancient drachmas. (Inconsistency note: the articles on drachma and obolus say a drachma was worth six oboluses, so 3 oboluses would be half a drachma.) According to Aristotle, Pericles first made service in the jury-courts a paid office, as a popular counter-measure against Cimon's wealth.
The 6.000 were drawn from the 10 tribes (each tribe was offering 600 members) and they were then divided into chambers of 600 jurymen, 500 or 501 of whom were regular members and the rest constituted alternate juror. In exceptional case the court could go into plenary sessions. Sometimes the chambers were comprising from 201 to 401 members or 1001 to 1501 members. After the choosing by lot, the heliasts had to take once every year the heliasts' oath. After the swearing-in, the jurors were receiving one box-wood ticket, with their own names and that of their father and deme written on it, and one letter of the alphabet as far as kappaand the jurors of each tribe were divided into ten sections, approximately an equal number under each letter.
Jurisdiction
Initially, Heliaia's jurisdiction was limited in judging the archons and, probably, some other similar accusations against public office-holders. It was when Ephialtes and Pericles prompted a binding resolution through ecclesia, stripping Areios Pagos, conservatism's hub, off most of the cases it judged, that Heliaia started judging almost all the civil and penal cases. Areios Pagos kept its competence only for the crimes of murder and arson, while the archons could impose some minor fines. Noteworhy, Heliaia's jurisdiction included also litigations, which involved Athenians and citizens of other cities or Athens and another city as subjects of international law. Namely, Heliaia functionned as a court competent for litigations of public, criminal and private international law.
Taking the jurisdiction over the so-called graphe paranomon, Heliaia replaced Areios Pagos in the execution of the legal control of the decisions of ecclesia. Until Ephialtes' reforms Areios Pagos had the duty of guarding the laws and to keep watch over the greatest and the most important of the affairs of state.
Procedure
Heliaia sited during all the working days, except for the three last days of each months and for the days, during which ecclesia was in session. The chambers sited outdoors, since there was no specific building where they could be lodged. Nonetheless, the location of the hearing was confined with a special hedge, outside of which the audience could stand.In detail, the legal procedure had as following:
The hegemon (??eľ??) of the court was responsible for gathering the suits and the complaints. After holding a preliminary investigation, he also had to subpoena the litigant parties and the witnesses before the jury. In the morning of the hearing day, the hegemon should determine by lot the chamber that would judge the case as well as the place where the jury would be convened. After the formation of the jury, the hegemon had to submit the conclusions of his preliminary investigation, announcing and defining the litigation, on which the court should decide. Then, it was the time for the plaintiff, the defendant and the witnesses to be heard. The arguments were exposed by the litigants themselves, without the legal support of a lawyer, in the form of an exchange of single speeches timed by water clock. In a public suit each litigant had three hours to speak, whereas they had much less in private suits (though here it was in proportion to the amount of money at stake). In this way the judicial cases became a vehement fight of impressions, since the jurors did not constitute a little group of mature citizens, such as the Council of Areios Pagos, which was interested only for the right application of the law. Additionally, before the Chambers of Heliaia each citizen had to become an effective orator and to act solely in his capacity as citizen, in order to protect his interests and to enforce his views.
Decisions were made by voting without any time set aside for deliberation. Nothing, however, stopped jurors from talking informally amongst themselves during the voting procedure and juries could be rowdy shouting out their disapproval or disbelief of things said by the litigants. This may have had some role in building a consensus. The voting procedure was public and transparent. Each heliast was receiving two votes, one "not guilty" and one "guilty". Then, the herald (?????a?) should, first, ask the heliasts if they wanted to submit any objections against the witnesses and, then, he should call them to cast their votes in two different amphoras, one of copper for the "non-guilty" votes and one of wood for the "guilty" votes. The voting was secret, since each juror had to cover with his fingers the vote, so that nobody sees, in which amphora he throws it. In the civil cases the voting procedure was different, because the amphoras were as many as the litigant parties and the jurors had to vindicate one of them, by casting their vote.
After the votes were counted, the herald was announcing the final result. In case of equality in votes, the defendant was acquitted, because he was considered to enjoy "the vote of Athena".
Sentences
Heliasts could impose either fines (for civil and penal cases) either "corporeal sentences" (only for penal cases). The fines of Heliaia were higher than the fines of the archons. The lato sensu "corporeal sentences" included death, imprisonment (for the non-Athenian citizens), atimia (sometimes along with confiscation) and exile .
Famous trials before Heliaia
Socrates' trial
Socrates was accused for impiety by Meletus, Anytus and Lycon. His trial took place in 399 BC and the jury found him guilty with 280 votes to 220. His death sentence was decided in a second voting, which was even worse for the philosopher. Nonetheless, Socrates did not lose his calm demeanor and, although during the trial he could propose to the jury his self-exile, he did not do it, since life away from his beloved city was pointless for him.
Pericles' trial
According to Plutarch, Pericles faced twice serious accusations. The first one just before the eruption of the Peloponnesian War and the second one during the first year of the war, when he was punished with a fine, the amount of which was either fifteen or fifty talents. Before the war a bill was passed, on motion of Dracontides, according to which Pericles should deposit his accounts of public moneys with the prytanes and the jurors should decide upon his case with ballots which had lain upon the altar of the goddess on the acropolis. This clause of the bill was however amended with the motion that the case be tried before fifteen hundred jurors in the ordinary way, whether one wanted to call it a prosecution for embezzlement and bribery, or malversation.
Citations
External links
See also
|
| |
|
|
