|
|
|
|
Hamitic
|
| |
|
| |
Hamitic is a historical term for the peoples supposedly descended from Noah's son Ham, paralleling Semitic and Japhetic.
It used to be used for grouping the non-Semitic Afro-Asiatic languages (which for this reason were described as "Hamito-Semitic"), but since, unlike the Semitic branch, these have not been shown to form a phylogenetic unity, the term is obsolete in this sense.
In scientific racism, the "Hamitic race" was a sub-group of the Caucasian race, alongside the Semitic race, grouping the populations native to North Africa, the Horn of Africa and South Arabia.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Hamitic'
Start a new discussion about 'Hamitic'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Hamitic is a historical term for the peoples supposedly descended from Noah's son Ham, paralleling Semitic and Japhetic.
It used to be used for grouping the non-Semitic Afro-Asiatic languages (which for this reason were described as "Hamito-Semitic"), but since, unlike the Semitic branch, these have not been shown to form a phylogenetic unity, the term is obsolete in this sense.
In scientific racism, the "Hamitic race" was a sub-group of the Caucasian race, alongside the Semitic race, grouping the populations native to North Africa, the Horn of Africa and South Arabia. The Hamitic theory suggested that the Hamite race was superior to or more advanced than Negroid populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. In its most extreme form, in the writings of C. G. Seligman it asserted that all significant achievements in African history were the work of "Hamites" who migrated into central Africa as pastoralists, bringing technologies and civilizing skills with them. Theoretical models of Hamitic languages and of Hamitic races were interlinked in the early twentieth century.
Hamitic race
Curse of Ham
The term Hamitic originally referred to the peoples believed to have been descended from the biblical Ham, one of the Sons of Noah. When Ham dishonors his father, Noah pronounces a curse on him, stating that the descendents of his son Canaan will be "servants of servants". Of Ham's four sons, Canaan fathered the Canaanites, while Mizraim fathered the Egyptians, Cush the Cushites and Phut the Libyans.
During the Middle Ages, this was interpreted to define Ham as the ancestor of all Africans. The curse was regularly interpreted as having created visible racial characteristics in Ham's offspring, notably black skin. According to Bernard Lewis, the sixth-century Babylonian Talmud states that "the descendants of Ham are cursed by being Black and are sinful with a degenerate progeny." Both Arab and later European and American slave traders used this story to justify African slavery. In fact, the Bible restricts the curse to the offspring of Ham's son Canaan, who occupied the Levant, not to his other sons who are supposed to have populated Africa. According to Edith Sanders, this restriction was increasingly emphasised by 19th century theologians, who rejected the curse as a justification for slavery.
Hamitic hypothesis
|
| |
|
|