Forum shopping is the
informal nameA colloquialism is an expression not used in formal speech, writing or paralinguistics. Colloquialisms are also sometimes referred to collectively as "colloquial language". Colloquialisms or colloquial language is considered to be characteristic of or only appropriate for casual, ordinary,...
given to the practice adopted by some litigants to get their
legal caseA legal case is a dispute between opposing parties resolved by a court, or by some equivalent legal process. A legal case may be either civil or criminal...
heard in the
courtA court is a body, often a governmental institution, with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes and dispense civil, criminal, or administrative justice in accordance with rules of law....
thought most likely to provide a favorable judgment. Some
statesState has several meanings in law:# in private international law and conflict of laws, State can refer to a well-defined jurisdiction, with its own set of laws and courts...
have, for example, become notorious as plaintiff-friendly
jurisdictionJurisdiction is the practical authority granted to a formally constituted legal body or to a political leader to deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a defined area of responsibility.Alternatively, jurisdiction is the authority given...
s and so have become litigation magnets even though there is little or no connection between the legal issues and the jurisdiction in which they are to be litigated.
Forum shopping is the
informal nameA colloquialism is an expression not used in formal speech, writing or paralinguistics. Colloquialisms are also sometimes referred to collectively as "colloquial language". Colloquialisms or colloquial language is considered to be characteristic of or only appropriate for casual, ordinary,...
given to the practice adopted by some litigants to get their
legal caseA legal case is a dispute between opposing parties resolved by a court, or by some equivalent legal process. A legal case may be either civil or criminal...
heard in the
courtA court is a body, often a governmental institution, with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes and dispense civil, criminal, or administrative justice in accordance with rules of law....
thought most likely to provide a favorable judgment. Some
statesState has several meanings in law:# in private international law and conflict of laws, State can refer to a well-defined jurisdiction, with its own set of laws and courts...
have, for example, become notorious as plaintiff-friendly
jurisdictionJurisdiction is the practical authority granted to a formally constituted legal body or to a political leader to deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a defined area of responsibility.Alternatively, jurisdiction is the authority given...
s and so have become litigation magnets even though there is little or no connection between the legal issues and the jurisdiction in which they are to be litigated. Through its expansive acceptance of personal jurisdiction, the
United StatesThe United States of America is a federal constitutional republic comprising fifty states and a federal district...
has also attracted foreign litigants wishing to take advantage of the more generous awards of
damagesIn law, damages are money claimed by, or ordered to be paid to, a person as compensation for loss or injury Black's Law Dictionary.- Compensatory damages :...
and
alimonyAlimony, maintenance or spousal support is an obligation established by divorce law in many countries that is based on the premise that both spouses have an absolute obligation to support each other during the marriage unless they are legally separated...
, extensive
discoveryIn American law, discovery is the pre-trial phase in a lawsuit in which each party through the law of civil procedure can request documents and other evidence from other parties and can compel the production of evidence by using a subpoena or through other discovery devices, such as requests for...
rules, and the
contingent feeA contingent fee in the United States or conditional fee in England & Wales is any fee for services provided where the fee is only payable if there is a favourable result...
system. In addition, the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act, the Alien Tort Claims Act, and many state
product liabilityProduct liability is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause.-Theories of liability:...
laws create legal rights that often do not exist in other jurisdictions.
Related notions
When a case is filed before a court, the court decides whether it has personal and subject matter jurisdiction, and if so, whether it is the most appropriate forum or venue. Under the doctrine of
forum non conveniensForum non conveniens is a discretionary power of mostly common law courts to refuse to hear a case that has been brought before it. The courts may refuse to take jurisdiction over matters where there is a more appropriate forum available to the parties...
,
LatinLatin is an Italic language originally spoken in Latium and Ancient Rome. Through the Roman conquest, Latin spread throughout the Mediterranean and a large part of Europe...
for "inconvenient forum", a judge has a discretion to transfer a case if the court selected is not the most convenient one. If the courts in two states would accept civil jurisdiction, the plaintiff must be able to show that justice requires the trial to take place in the forum suggested by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff might have selected one forum on the following grounds:
- The forum is not convenient to the defendant or his witnesses. There may be problems of expense of travel, health, or visa or entry permit.
- The court, the judge, or the law is most likely to favour the plaintiff's case.
The defendant may take the following actions:
- The defendant may argue in the forum court that it should reject the jurisdiction and petition to transfer the case to an allegedly more convenient forum; or
- If a case has been filed in another jurisdiction, the defendant may seek injunctive
An injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a court order, whereby a party is required to do, or to refrain from doing, certain acts. The party that fails to adhere to the injunction faces civil or criminal penalties and may have to pay damages or accept sanctions for failing to follow the...
relief against the plaintiff in a second state, requiring that the plaintiff discontinue the action in the first forum and instead submit the case for hearing in this allegedly more convenient forum.
In both instances, the first step is to determine whether the first instance forum is the natural forum, or whether the forum has the closest connection with the action and the parties. The court adjudicates whether there is another forum that is more appropriate under the
doctrine of comityIn law, comity specifically refers to legal reciprocity—the principle that one jurisdiction will extend certain courtesies to other nations , particularly by recognizing the validity and effect of their executive, legislative, and judicial acts...
. The current forum court must respect the right of a foreign court to assume jurisdiction. A court must balance the interests of the parties, since there is injustice not only when a plaintiff is allowed to pursue the action in a forum inconvenient to the defendant, but also when a plaintiff is not allowed a timely trial.
Generally, the court will not grant a petition to transfer or an injunction, if the grant will unjustly deprive the plaintiff of advantages in the first instance forum. Nevertheless, there should be a real and substantial connection between the venue and the cause(s) of action to provide some protection against defendants from being pursued in jurisdictions having little or no connection with the transaction or the parties.
If the alternative court concludes that another court has assumed jurisdiction either without considering whether there was an alternative forum or reached an obviously unreasonable conclusion on the merits, an
injunctionAn injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a court order, whereby a party is required to do, or to refrain from doing, certain acts. The party that fails to adhere to the injunction faces civil or criminal penalties and may have to pay damages or accept sanctions for failing to follow the...
would sometimes be a reasonable response. If, on the other hand, the alternative court has reasonably concluded that there was no more convenient forum, comity requires it to respect the decision of the court that has already assumed jurisdiction and dismiss the application for an injunction and transfer. In cases where there is a sound argument to be made in favour of both courts, the court in the second venue should not arbitrarily claim a better right to decide for both jurisdictions. In most cases it will be obvious whether the foreign court has acted on principles similar to those applied in the second venue court and, if so, the second venue court should refuse relief.
Forum shopping by the plaintiff
A plaintiff frequently has a choice of bringing a case in one of several jurisdictions, by picking a
federalThe federal government of the United States is the central government entity established by the United States Constitution, which shares sovereignty over the United States with the governments of the individual U.S. states. The federal government has three branches: the legislative, executive, and...
rather than a
local jurisdictionA U.S. state is any one of 50 federated states of the United States of America that share sovereignty with the federal government . Because of this shared sovereignty, an American is a citizen both of the federal entity and of his or her state of domicile...
, or a local rather than federal jurisdiction, or one of several geographic localities. The defendant in a civil case can be sued in a jurisdiction where he lives, or where the cause of action occurred. In the United States, the
district court for the eastern district of TexasThe United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas is the Federal district court with jurisdiction over the eastern part of Texas and is a part of the Fifth Circuit. The court's headquarters are in Tyler, Texas and has five subdivision offices in Beaumont, Lufkin, Marshall,...
in
Marshall, TexasMarshall is a town in Harrison County in the northeastern corner of Texas. This town is a major cultural and educational center in East Texas, and the tri-state area. As of the 2000 U.S. Census, the population of Marshall was about 23,935...
has become a popular forum for
patentA patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state to an inventor or their assignee for a limited period of time in exchange for a public disclosure of an invention....
lawsuits, since it found in favor of the plaintiff 78% of the time, compared to a national average of 59%.
Forum shopping by the civil defendant
A defendant can resort to various procedures or theories to have a case removed from the court where the plaintiff originally filed it. The defendant may invoke the
removal jurisdictionIn the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court of the original court's district. This is a general exception to the usual American rule giving the plaintiff the right to make the decision on the...
of a federal court to take a claim out of the state court, request for a
change of venueA change of venue is the legal term for moving a trial to a new location. In high-profile matters, a change of venue may occur to move a jury trial away from a location where a fair and impartial jury may not be possible due to widespread publicity about a crime and/or its defendant to another...
because the case was brought in the improper court within the jurisdiction, and move for
forum non conveniens on the ground that the case was brought in an inappropriate forum based on the locations of the parties or evidence.
Forum shopping in criminal cases
Forum shopping also happens, albeit less frequently, in U.S. federal
criminalThe term criminal law, sometimes called penal law, refers to any of various bodies of rules in different jurisdictions whose common characteristic is the potential for unique and often severe impositions as punishment for failure to comply...
trials, especially as certain
districtsThe 94 United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. Both civil and criminal cases are filed in the district court, which is a court of law, equity, and admiralty. There is a United States bankruptcy court associated with each United States...
and
circuitsThe United States courts of appeals are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal court system...
are widely thought to favor the government in particular issues or trials. It is often claimed that the U.S. federal trials of alleged
terroristsTerrorism is the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.At present, there is no internationally agreed definition of terrorism...
were forum shopped.
Criminal defendants have much less power to change the forum in which the case against them has been brought. Generally, they can do so only where they can show that localized notoriety or publicity makes it unlikely that an impartial jury can be selected in the district in which charges were brought.
Efforts to dissuade forum shopping
Courts may object to forum shopping for several reasons. It would offend the sense of justice, if the fair resolution of a case should not hinge on technical differences from one jurisdiction to the next. More practically, judges feel that their courts are overburdened and fear that having the reputation of a forum favorable to certain types of plaintiffs will increase their work load, thus delaying the timely dispensation of justice in other cases.
Under the
Erie doctrineIn the law of the United States, Erie doctrine is a fundamental legal doctrine of civil procedure mandating that a federal court in diversity jurisdiction must apply state substantive law....
, a federal court hearing a case under the
diversity jurisdictionIn the law of the United States, diversity jurisdiction is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction in civil procedure in which a United States district court has to hear a civil case because the persons that are parties are "diverse" in citizenship, which generally indicates that they are citizens...
must apply the law of the state in which the court is sitting. Under the choice of law, the law of the state which has the closest nexus to the case is applied.
Parties to a
contractIn the Conflict of Laws, the validity of a contract with one or more foreign law elements will be decided by reference to the so-called "proper law" of the contract.-History:...
may seek to prevent forum shopping by inserting a
forum selection clauseA forum selection clause in a contract with a Conflict of Laws element allows the parties to agree that any litigation resulting from that contract will be initiated in a specific forum...
or a
choice of law clauseA choice of law clause or proper law clause in a contract is one in which the parties specify which law will be applied to resolve any disputes arising under the contract....
in their contract. Such clauses are now generally enforced by the courts.
In the Philippines
Forum shopping is considered a serious offense which can be made by a complainant. The law in the Philippines explicitly prohibits the filing of more than one case for the same cause of action in any forum or court of law. The prohibition is done so that the courts will not be clogged by complaints of people who may file more than one complaint in an effort to gain a favorable decision in any of the numerous cases filed.
See also
- Asylum shopping
Asylum shopping is a term used mostly in the context of the European Union and the Schengen area to describe the practice by asylum seekers of applying for asylum in several member states or seeking to apply in a particular state after transiting other member states...
- Jurisdiction shopping
- "Race to the courthouse
"Race to the courthouse" is an informal name used to describe the rule in some jurisdictions that the first conveyance instrument, mortgage, lien or judgment to be filed with the appropriate recorder's office, will have priority and prevail over documents filed subsequently, irrespective of the...
"
- Tort reform in the United States
- Libel tourism
Libel tourism is a term first coined by Geoffrey Robertson QC to describe a form of forum shopping in which plaintiffs choose to file libel suits in jurisdictions thought more likely to give a favourable result...
External links