|
|
|
|
Evolutionary taxonomy
|
| |
|
| |
Evolutionary taxonomy or evolutionary systematics seeks to classify organisms using a combination of phylogenetic relationship and overall similarity. It differs from strict cladism where all taxa in a classification always should include all descendants of a single ancestral node. It thus allows for paraphyletic taxa. There is also a difference in the use of the word monophyletic. For evolutionary systematicists, monophyletic means that a group derives from a single common ancestor included in the group, whereas for cladists it also means that the group includes all species descended from that group.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Evolutionary taxonomy'
Start a new discussion about 'Evolutionary taxonomy'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Evolutionary taxonomy or evolutionary systematics seeks to classify organisms using a combination of phylogenetic relationship and overall similarity. It differs from strict cladism where all taxa in a classification always should include all descendants of a single ancestral node. It thus allows for paraphyletic taxa. There is also a difference in the use of the word monophyletic. For evolutionary systematicists, monophyletic means that a group derives from a single common ancestor included in the group, whereas for cladists it also means that the group includes all species descended from that group. The term holophyletic has been proposed for the latter meaning.
The product of evolutionary systematics is a division according to Linnean taxonomy (which can then be used to form tentative conclusions about phylogeny); the product of a cladistic classification is a cladogram, which can then be used to recommend a taxonomy.
Cladistics collects character data only from the taxa being classified; it does not consider the inferred characters of ancestors.
Evolutionary systematics also differs in method from cladistics. Cladistics involves collecting data and feeding it into a computer program. Evolutionary systematics involves a researcher following flexible guidelines which consider various kinds of evidence (which need not be represented as discrete alternatives).
Other debates between evolutionary systematists and cladists are not about the underlying approach, but on details. One is whether there is a danger of artificial classifications when preparing a classification using molecular phylogeny based on only a single gene or part of a gene. Another is whether it is sufficient to study DNA from chloroplasts, mitochondria, and ribosomes, as opposed to non-ribosomal nuclear DNA.
|
| |
|
|