|
|
|
|
Double dissolution
|
| |
|
| |
A double dissolution is a procedure permitted under the Australian Constitution to resolve deadlocks between the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The two houses generally have equal legislative powers, the only exception being that appropriation (money) bills must originate in the House of Representatives. This means that governments, which are formed in the House of Representatives, can be seriously frustrated by Senate majorities determined to reject their legislation.
In these circumstances, Section 57 of the Constitution allows the Governor-General to dissolve the House of Representatives and the entire Senate and issue writs for an election in which every seat in the Parliament is contested.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Double dissolution'
Start a new discussion about 'Double dissolution'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
A double dissolution is a procedure permitted under the Australian Constitution to resolve deadlocks between the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The two houses generally have equal legislative powers, the only exception being that appropriation (money) bills must originate in the House of Representatives. This means that governments, which are formed in the House of Representatives, can be seriously frustrated by Senate majorities determined to reject their legislation.
In these circumstances, Section 57 of the Constitution allows the Governor-General to dissolve the House of Representatives and the entire Senate and issue writs for an election in which every seat in the Parliament is contested. This is the only occasion on which the entire Senate is dissolved. Convention dictates that the Governor-General act only on the advice of the Prime Minister.
Section 57 provides:
If the House of Representatives passes any proposed law, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the House of Representatives, in the same or the next session, again passes the proposed law with or without any amendments which have been made, suggested, or agreed to by the Senate, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, the Governor-General may dissolve the Senate and the House of Representatives simultaneously. But such dissolution shall not take place within six months before the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives by effluxion of time.
Section 57 also provides that, following the election, if the Senate again rejects the bill or bills that were the subject of the double dissolution, the Governor-General may convene a joint sitting of the two houses to consider the bill or bills, including any amendments which have been previously proposed in either house, or any new amendments. If a bill is passed by an absolute majority of the total membership of the joint sitting, it is treated as though it had been passed separately by both houses, and is presented for Royal Assent.
There were double dissolutions in 1914, 1951, 1974, 1975, 1983 and 1987. However, the 1974 Joint Sitting is so far the only one held pursuant to Section 57 .
The following table is a summary of the relevant details:
| Date of double dissolution | Date of election | Governor-General | Prime Minister | Leader of the Opposition | Outcome |
|---|
| 30 July 1914 | 5 September 1914 | Sir Ronald Munro-Ferguson | Joseph Cook | Andrew Fisher | The Cook Commonwealth Liberal Party government was defeated by Andrew Fisher's Australian Labor Party. | | 19 March 1951 | 28 April 1951 | Sir William McKell | Robert Menzies | Ben Chifley | The Menzies Liberal-Country Party coalition government was opposed by Chifley's Labor Party, but was returned with a majority in both houses. | | 11 April 1974 | 18 May 1974 | Sir Paul Hasluck | Gough Whitlam | Billy Snedden | The Whitlam Labor government was returned, but still without a majority in the Senate. The bills were reintroduced and again rejected by the coalition-controlled Senate. Sir Paul Hasluck's term ended on 11 July and the new Governor-General Sir John Kerr approved Whitlam's request for a joint sitting. This was held on 6-7 August 1974, and it passed all the bills. | | 11 November 1975 | 13 December 1975 | Sir John Kerr | Malcolm Fraser (caretaker) | Gough Whitlam | Fraser, who, as Leader of the Liberal-Country coalition Opposition, had opposed the bills, had been appointed caretaker Prime Minister in extraordinary circumstances following Kerr's dismissal of the Whitlam government. The Fraser minority government immediately lost a no-confidence motion in the lower house; however, on Fraser's advice, Kerr dissolved the Parliament before the Speaker Gordon Scholes had an opportunity to advise Kerr to invite Whitlam to form a government again. Hence, Fraser remained the caretaker Prime Minister during the election campaign. On 13 December the Fraser government was elected in its own right. | | 3 February 1983 | 5 March 1983 | Sir Ninian Stephen | Malcolm Fraser | Bob Hawke | The Fraser coalition government was defeated by the Labor opposition led by Bob Hawke. When Fraser called the election, he expected he would be facing Bill Hayden as the alternative prime minister. But unbeknown to Fraser, Labor had changed leadership from Hayden to Hawke earlier that same morning. | | 5 June 1987 | 11 July 1987 | Sir Ninian Stephen | Bob Hawke | John Howard | The Hawke government was returned, but still without a Senate majority. The Australia Card bill was reintroduced in September and a vote in the Senate was planned for 7 October. During that period, a retired former Deputy Secretary of the Attorney-General's Department, Ewart Smith (1920-1991), pointed out in letters to newspapers that the Australia Card bill was unworkable because the implementation date was not part of the legislation, and would have to be a matter of a separate regulation. Even if the bill had been passed - whether by the usual process or in a joint sitting - and given Royal Assent, the opposition parties could still have combined to disallow the regulation, thus preventing the act from ever being implemented. John Stone, a former Secretary to the Treasury who had been elected in July as a National Party senator from Queensland, contacted Smith, confirmed the detail, and brought this information to the attention of his party. The coalition embarrassed the Hawke government by bringing the matter to light during Question Time on 23 September. After acknowledging that, even if passed, it was likely the bill could not be implemented, Hawke decided to abandon the Australia Card bill. Ewart Smith later wrote a book about the affair, from his perspective, titled The Australia Card: The Story of its Defeat (Melbourne, Sun Books 1989). |
|
| |
|
|