|
|
|
|
Deposit insurance
|
| |
|
| |
Explicit deposit insurance is a measure introduced by policy makers in many countries to protect deposits, in full or in part, in the event of a "run" on a bank or banks. The failure of a banking institution has the potential to trigger a much broader spectrum of harmful events. Deposit insurance systems are one component of a financial system safety net that contributes to the promotion of financial stability.
purpose of deposit insurance varies from one country to another but in most cases they are designed to protect less financially sophisticated depositors and to contribute to financial stability in an environment where banks are allowed to lend, or use otherwise, most of the money that they receive as deposits instead of safe-keeping the full amounts (see fractional-reserve banking).
Many national deposit insurers are members of the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI), an international organization established to contribute to the stability of financial systems by promoting international cooperation and to encourage wide international contact among deposit insurers and other interested parties, in particular, IADI.
Detractors of deposit insurance claim the scheme would introduce a moral hazard issue, with both depositors and banks taking on excessive risks.
sit insurance institutions are for the most part government run or established, and may or may not be a part of a country’s central bank, while some are private entities with government backing or completely private entities.
There are a number of countries with more than one deposit insurance system in operation (e.g.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Deposit insurance' Start a new discussion about 'Deposit insurance' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
Explicit deposit insurance is a measure introduced by policy makers in many countries to protect deposits, in full or in part, in the event of a "run" on a bank or banks. The failure of a banking institution has the potential to trigger a much broader spectrum of harmful events. Deposit insurance systems are one component of a financial system safety net that contributes to the promotion of financial stability.
Why it is needed
The purpose of deposit insurance varies from one country to another but in most cases they are designed to protect less financially sophisticated depositors and to contribute to financial stability in an environment where banks are allowed to lend, or use otherwise, most of the money that they receive as deposits instead of safe-keeping the full amounts (see fractional-reserve banking).
Many national deposit insurers are members of the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI), an international organization established to contribute to the stability of financial systems by promoting international cooperation and to encourage wide international contact among deposit insurers and other interested parties, in particular, IADI.
Detractors of deposit insurance claim the scheme would introduce a moral hazard issue, with both depositors and banks taking on excessive risks.
How it works
Deposit insurance institutions are for the most part government run or established, and may or may not be a part of a country’s central bank, while some are private entities with government backing or completely private entities.
There are a number of countries with more than one deposit insurance system in operation (e.g. Austria, Canada (Ontario & Quebec), Germany, Italy and the United States.
On the other hand, one deposit insurance system can cover more than one country: the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Puerto Rico are insured by the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon will be covered also by a single system.
Overview by country
According to IADI, as of June 2008, there are currently 119 countries with a deposit insurance system in operation, pending, planned or under serious study (i.e. 99 in operation, 8 pending, 12 planned or under serious study).
North America
United States
The United States was the first country to establish an official deposit insurance scheme, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, during a Great Depression banking crisis in 1933.
A separate fund, the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) administered by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), was created in 1970 to insure deposits at credit unions.
Canada
Canada created its own Deposit Insurance Corporation in 1967. It is similar to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in the United States. Since 1967, 43 financial institutions have failed in Canada and all were members of CDIC. There have been no failures since 1996. Information on the Canadian system is found at http://www.cdic.ca. Insurance is restricted to registered member institutions, and covers only the first C$100,000 in very specific categories of accounts. Credit unions and Quebec’s caisse populaire system are not insured Federally, because they are created under Provincial charters and backed by Provincial insurance plans, which generally follow the Federal model. Funds in a foreign currency, not Canadian dollars, are not insured, such as a US dollar accounts even when held in a registered CDIC financial institutions. GICs with a longer term than 5 years are also not insured. Funds in foreign banks operating in Canada may or may nor be covered depending on whether they are members of CDIC . Some funds in the RRSP or RRIF at their bank may not covered if they are invested in mutual funds or held in specific instruments like debentures issued by government or corporations. The general principle is to cover reasonable deposits and savings, but not deposits deliberately positioned to take risks for gain, such as mutual funds or stocks.
The roots of all of this well organized reform can be traced back to the 19th century, such as the Upper Canada’s financial problems of 1866, the North American panic of 1872 and the 1923 failure of Toronto’s Home Bank, symbolized today by Casa Loma. Historically in Canada regional risk has always been spread nationally within each large bank, unlike the uneven geography of US unit banking. layered with savings & loans of regional or national size, who in turn disperse their risk through investors. Generally speaking, the Canadian banking system is well regulated, in part by the little known Inspector of Financial Institutions, who can in an extreme case close a financial institution. That, plus Canada’s tight mortgage rules, mean the risk of bank failures similar to the US are slim, but not impossible.
Mexico
Mexico’s Banking Act of 1897 established the legal possibility of failure of a credit institution, but set up some mechanisms in the banking law itself to prevent bank failures -- but the law itself did not create a formal insurance scheme. In 1981 the General Law of Credit Institutions and Auxiliary Organizations provided for the creation of a fund to protect credit obligations assumed by banks.
Caribbean & South America
European Union
Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes requires all member states to have a deposit guarantee scheme for at least 90% of the deposited amount, up to at least 20,000 euro per person. On October 7, 2008, the Ecofin meeting of EU's ministers of finance agreed to increase the minimum amount to 50,000. Timelines and details on procedures for the implementation, which is likely to be a national matter for the member states, was not immediately available.
The increased amount followed on Irelands move, in September 2008, to increase its deposit insurance to an unlimited amount. Many other EU countries, starting with the United Kingdom, reacted by increasing its limit to avoid that people transfer savings to Irish banks.
By EU country
As of October 2008, many EU countries are in the process of increasing the amounts covered by their despoit insurance schemes. Since these amounts are typically encoded in legislation, there is a certain delay before the new amounts are formally valid.
| Country | Savings limit | Coverage | Valid since | Comments and previous amounts |
|---|
| Belgium | EUR 40,000 (*) | 100% | | Divided into initial compensation of up to 20,000 euro and additional compensation of up to 20,000 euro. | | Denmark | DKK 300,000 (*) | | | | | Finland | EUR 50,000 | 100% | 1998 | Increased from EUR 25,000 on October 8, 2008. The increased amount is valid until December 31, 2009. | | France | EUR 70,000 | 100% | | | | Germany | EUR 20,000 (*) | 90 % | October 2008 | Additional voluntary guarantee schemes run by different banking associations (private banks, cooperative banks, savings banks). An unlimited state guarantee was announced in October 2008, if one of those schemes failed. The legal details are nevertheless unclear. | | Greece | EUR 100,000 | | October 2008 | Was 20,000 EUR, increased in October 2008 | | Ireland | Unlimited | | September 2008 | Amount raised to unlimited in September 2008 | | Italy | EUR 103,291.38 | 100% | December 4, 1996 | | | Netherlands | EUR 40,000 (*) | 100% of first EUR 20,000, 90% of next EUR 20,000 (hence a compensation of up to EUR 38,000) | | Temporarily until October 2009: 100% of first EUR 100,000. | | Poland | EUR 50,000 (PLN 175,000) | 100% | October 2008 | Amount raised from EUR 22,500 in October 2008 | | Portugal | Unlimited | | October 2008 | Amount raised from EUR 25,000 to unlimited in October 2008 | | Spain | EUR 20,000 (*) | 100% | 1998 | | | Sweden | SEK 500,000 | 100% | October 6, 2008 | From 1996 to October 2008, amount was SEK 250,000. | | United Kingdom | GBP 50,000 | 100% | October 7, 2008 | Amount raised from 35,000 to GBP 50,000 effective October 7, 2008. Before October 1, 2007 coverage was 100% of the first GBP 2,000 and 90% between 2,000 and GBP 35,000. |
Footnote: (*) Those countries which have a deposit insurance of less than EUR 50,000 are expected to increase the amount following an October 7, 2008 meeting of the Ecofin.
Rest of Europe
Iceland
Deposit insurance in Iceland is handled by (Tryggingarsjóður) Depositors’ and Investors’ Guarantee Fund (DIGF) and covers a minimum of 20 887 euros.
Norway
Deposit insurance in Norway is handled by the Norwegian Banks' Guarantee Fund (Bankenes sikringsfond) and covers deposits up to 2 million NOK.
Russia
Russia enacted deposit insurance law in December 2003 and established the national deposit insurance agency (DIA) in 2004. Until 2004, Russian banking system was divided: obligations of state-owned Sberbank were guaranteed by law, while other banks were not insured in any way, creating an unfair advantage for Sberbank. The law addresses only individuals' deposits. Maximum compensation is limited at 400,000 roubles (equivalent to 16 thousand US dollars or 11 thousand Euro at July 2008 exchange rate); amounts up to 100,000 roubles are repaid at face value, the balance at 10% discount. As at January 2008, DIA funds exceeded 68 billion roubles (2.8 billion US dollars). There were 15 "insured events" (bankruptcy cases involving DIA intervention) in 2007 with resulting payout reaching 350 million roubles.
The agency is set up as a state-owned corporation, managed jointly by Central Bank and the government of Russia. DIA membership is mandatory requirement for any bank operating with private investors' money. Central Bank of Russia used admission of banks into DIA system to weed out unsound banks and money launderers. The murder of Andrey Kozlov, the Central Bank executive in charge of DIA admission, was directly linked to his non-compromising attitude to money launderers.
Switzerland
Switzerland has a privately operated deposit insurance system called Deposit Protection of Swiss Banks and Securities Dealers . It guarantees up to CHF 100'000 per bank customer per bank. Membership is compulsory for all banks and securities dealers who are regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority . See the list of members of the Deposit Protection of Swiss Banks and Securities dealers at http://www.einlagensicherung.ch/en/bankkunden-link/bankkunden-unterzeichner.htm
It had covered depositors in 1993 in the case of the failure of Spar- und Leihkasse Thun SLT, Thun. The next cases happened in 2007 with the liquidation of AB FIN SA (a securites dealer) in Lugano and with Kauphting (Luxembourg) SA, Geneva branch which was closed on October 9, 2008. Clients of this bank received the payments (at the time up to CHF 30'000 per customer) within 3 weeks.
For further information see the FAQ at http://www.einlagensicherung.ch/en/bankkunden-link/bankkunden-faq.htm
British Isles Offshore
Although many offshore subsidiaries of mostly British-based banks and building societies in the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey offer a parental guarantee for all sums deposited with them, the Crown Dependencies fall outside the jurisdiction of both the United Kingdom's Financial Services Authority guarantee to underwrite the first £50,000 per depositor per bank and the European Economic Area 'passport scheme' that pays a minimum of £16,000 per depositor per bank in the case of a default. In 1991, the Isle of Man introduced a bank depositors' insurance scheme to cover 75 percent of the first £15,000 per depositor per bank, but it was the October 2008 crisis-stricken Icelandic government's seizure of Kaupthing Bank hf in Iceland after the United Kingdom suspended the trading licence of Kaupthing's British subsidiary that compelled a radical revision of deposit insurance in the Isle of Man. Unable to secure reserves held by Kaupthing hf in Iceland or Kaupthing's British subsidiary to facilitate customer withdrawals, Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander (Isle of Man) Ltd. saw its Isle of Man banking licence suspended after operating less than a year, compelling the firm to request to be wound up. The Isle of Man government called an emergency session of the Tynwald parliament which voted unanimously to bring the Isle of Man depositors' compensation scheme into line with the newly-enlarged scheme in the United Kingdom, guaranteeing with immediate effect 100 percent of the first £50,000 per depositor per bank, and studying amendments for the subsequent inclusion within the scheme of corporate and charitable accounts. The Isle of Man government also pressed the Icelandic government to honour Kaupthing hf's irrevocable and binding guarantee of all depositors' funds held by Kaupthing, Singer and Friedlander (Isle of Man) Ltd. In Jersey and Guernsey, deposit insurance schemes for non-residents have yet to be enacted.
Australia & New Zealand
The Australian Prime Minister announced on October 12, 2008 that, in response to the Economic crisis of 2008, 100% of all deposits would be protected over the subsequent three year period. This measure comes on top of existing mandates of APRA and ASIC to monitor Australian banks and deposit taking authorities to ensure that their risks do not compromise the safety of depositors funds.
New Zealand has announced on October 12, 2008, that an opt-in scheme for retail deposits will be introduced. 100% cover. Banks and other institutions. First NZ$5billion free, excess amounts charged at 10 basis point pa.
Asia
India
India was the second country in the world to introduce Deposit Insurance in 1962. The Deposit Insurance Corporation commenced functioning on January 1, 1962 under the aegis of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). 1971 witnessed the establishment of another institution, the Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. (CGCI). In 1978, the DIC and the CGCI were merged to form the (DICGC).
Hong Kong
- Deposit Protection Scheme
Hong Kong Deposit Protection Board, which is a independent and statutory institution formed to manage and supervise the operation of Deposit Protection Scheme. The maximum protection amount of deposit is HKD$100,000.
Economic impact
When a nation state has a deposit insurance scheme, foreign investors (aka non-resident bank depositors) are more likely to passively deposit larger amounts of money in the banks of said nation state (that has a bank deposit insurance scheme).
Having a bank deposit insurance scheme (for all practical purposes) guarantees that a nation state will more likely have a higher rate of passive foreign investment (within the margin of insurable amount).
Passive foreign investment in a nation state’s finance system allows for more lending to be made when global finance system conditions constrict the amount of lendable money. There has been substantial research done over the years on the impact on foreign investment of bank deposit insurance schemes.
Deposit insurance organizations and programmes
These are the Crown or State run deposit insurance corporations
See also
Related topics
Research and guidance papers on deposit insurance
Related research papers
- Research and Guidance Committee(2006), , IADI, January 2006
- Research and Guidance Committee(2005), , IADI, December 2005
- Research and Guidance Committee(2005), , IADI, February 2005
- Asli Demirguc-Kunt, Baybars Karacaovali, Luc Laeven (2005), , World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3628, June 2005
- Working Group on Deposit Insurance (2001), , Financial Stability Forum, September 2001
- Working Group on Deposit Insurance (2001), , Financial Stability Forum, September 2001
External links
International
Africa
Americas
-
-
-
- (Mexico)
- (Brazil)
- (Colombia)
- (Peru)
- (El Salvador)
-
- (Québec)
- (USA)
- (Argentina)
- (Ecuador)
Asia
Europe
- (Europe)
- (United Kingdom)
- (Belgium)
- [https://www.insattningsgarantin.se/en/ National Debt Office - Deposit Insurance] (Sweden)
-
- (Russian Federation)
-
- (Czech Republic)
- (Finland)
- (France)
- (Hungary)
- (Italy)
- (Turkey)
- (Isle of Man)
- (Spain)
- (Switzerland)
Others
Criticisms
|
| |
|
|
