Commissioner v. Duberstein
Encyclopedia
Commissioner v. Duberstein, , was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the exclusion of "the value of property acquired by gift
" from the gross income
of an income taxpayer.
It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holdings:
. Although Duberstein said he did not need the car as he already had a Cadillac and an Oldsmobile
, he eventually accepted it. Mohawk Metal Corporation later deducted the value of the car as a business expense, but Duberstein did not include the value of the Cadillac in his gross income when he filed his tax return, deeming it a gift. The Commissioner asserted a deficiency for the car’s value against Duberstein. The Tax court affirmed.
as the comptroller of the Church corporation and president of the corporation. He resigned from both positions to go into business for himself. As a "gratuity" the corporation's directors awarded Stanton $20,000 in appreciation of the services rendered. While some directors testified that Stanton had been well liked by all in the Vestry
and the $20,000 was a gift to show that good will, there was also some evidence given that Stanton was being forced to resign. The trial judge made a simple finding that the payments were a "gift".
Was the money that Stanton received a gift for taxation purposes?
, for the majority, upheld the Tax court's ruling with regards to Duberstein: Duberstein's car was not a gift, because the motives were certainly not "disinterested" -- it was given to compensate for past customer references or to encourage future references. Duberstein at 291-92.
The court split as to Stanton. A plurality remanded Stanton's situation back to the trial court, to determine whether the Vestry intended to give the money as a gift or as compensation. Id. at 292.
Instead, when determining whether something is a gift for taxation purposes, the critical consideration is the transferor's intention. Duberstein at 285-286 (citing Bogardus v. Commissioner
). This is a question of fact that must be determined on a "case-by-case basis". Duberstein at 290. The body that levies the tax must conduct an objective inquiry that looks to "the mainsprings of human conduct to the totality of the fact of each case." Duberstein at 289. The trier of fact must consider all of the evidence in front of it and determine whether the transferor's intention was either disinterested or involved:
Gift
A gift or a present is the transfer of something without the expectation of receiving something in return. Although gift-giving might involve an expectation of reciprocity, a gift is meant to be free. In many human societies, the act of mutually exchanging money, goods, etc. may contribute to...
" from the gross income
Gross income
Gross income in United States tax law is receipts and gains from all sources less cost of goods sold. Gross income is the starting point for determining Federal and state income tax of individuals, corporations, estates and trusts, whether resident or nonresident."Except as otherwise provided" by...
of an income taxpayer.
It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holdings:
- When determining whether something is a gift for taxation purposes, the critical consideration is the transferor's intention. This is a question of fact that must be determined on a "case-by-case basis". The body that levies the tax must conduct an objective inquiry that looks to "the mainsprings of human conduct to the totality of the fact of each case." On review, the trier of fact must consider all of the evidence in front of it and determine whether the transferor's intention was either disinterested or involved:
- Gifts result from "detached and disinterested generosity" and are often given out of "affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses.
- Contrast payments given as an "involved and intensely interested" act.
No. 376, Commissioner v. Duberstein
Berman was president of Mohawk Metal Corporation. Duberstein was president of the Duberstein Iron & Metal Company. They would often talk on the phone and give each other names of potential customers. After receiving some particularly helpful information, Berman decided to give Duberstein a gift of a CadillacCadillac
Cadillac is an American luxury vehicle marque owned by General Motors . Cadillac vehicles are sold in over 50 countries and territories, but mostly in North America. Cadillac is currently the second oldest American automobile manufacturer behind fellow GM marque Buick and is among the oldest...
. Although Duberstein said he did not need the car as he already had a Cadillac and an Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile was a brand of American automobile produced for most of its existence by General Motors. It was founded by Ransom E. Olds in 1897. In its 107-year history, it produced 35.2 million cars, including at least 14 million built at its Lansing, Michigan factory...
, he eventually accepted it. Mohawk Metal Corporation later deducted the value of the car as a business expense, but Duberstein did not include the value of the Cadillac in his gross income when he filed his tax return, deeming it a gift. The Commissioner asserted a deficiency for the car’s value against Duberstein. The Tax court affirmed.
No. 506, Stanton v. United States
Stanton worked for the Trinity Church in New York CityNew York City
New York is the most populous city in the United States and the center of the New York Metropolitan Area, one of the most populous metropolitan areas in the world. New York exerts a significant impact upon global commerce, finance, media, art, fashion, research, technology, education, and...
as the comptroller of the Church corporation and president of the corporation. He resigned from both positions to go into business for himself. As a "gratuity" the corporation's directors awarded Stanton $20,000 in appreciation of the services rendered. While some directors testified that Stanton had been well liked by all in the Vestry
Vestry
A vestry is a room in or attached to a church or synagogue in which the vestments, vessels, records, etc., are kept , and in which the clergy and choir robe or don their vestments for divine service....
and the $20,000 was a gift to show that good will, there was also some evidence given that Stanton was being forced to resign. The trial judge made a simple finding that the payments were a "gift".
The Issues
Was the car that Duberstein received a gift for taxation purposes?Was the money that Stanton received a gift for taxation purposes?
Holdings
Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.William J. Brennan, Jr.
William Joseph Brennan, Jr. was an American jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1956 to 1990...
, for the majority, upheld the Tax court's ruling with regards to Duberstein: Duberstein's car was not a gift, because the motives were certainly not "disinterested" -- it was given to compensate for past customer references or to encourage future references. Duberstein at 291-92.
The court split as to Stanton. A plurality remanded Stanton's situation back to the trial court, to determine whether the Vestry intended to give the money as a gift or as compensation. Id. at 292.
Reasoning
The Court first rejected the premise that a "gift" for taxation purposes was the same as "gift" in common law terms. Duberstein at 285. The Court also rejected the premise that there is a bright line as to what constitutes a gift for taxation purposes. Id at 287.Instead, when determining whether something is a gift for taxation purposes, the critical consideration is the transferor's intention. Duberstein at 285-286 (citing Bogardus v. Commissioner
Bogardus v. Commissioner
Bogardus v. Commissioner, was a case before the U.S. Supreme Court discussing, under United States tax law, how to distinguish compensation from tax-exempt gifts under §102...
). This is a question of fact that must be determined on a "case-by-case basis". Duberstein at 290. The body that levies the tax must conduct an objective inquiry that looks to "the mainsprings of human conduct to the totality of the fact of each case." Duberstein at 289. The trier of fact must consider all of the evidence in front of it and determine whether the transferor's intention was either disinterested or involved:
- Gifts result from "detached and disinterested generosity." Duberstein at 285 (quoting Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. LoBue, 351 U.S. 243 (1956)). Gifts are often given out of "affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses." Duberstein at 285 (quoting Robertson v. United StatesRobertson v. United StatesRobertson v. United States, , was an income tax case before the U.S. Supreme Court discussing, under United States tax law, whether prizes are exempt as gifts under §102....
, 343 U.S. 711, 714 (1952). - Contrast payments given as an "involved and intensely interested" act. See Olk v. United StatesOlk v. United StatesOlk v. United States, 536 F.2d 876, 76-2 U.S. Tax Cas. paragr. 9484 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 920, 97 S. Ct. 317 , was a case decided before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit which dealt with the question of whether tips to casino dealers were taxable as income to the...
, 536 F.2d 876 (9th Cir. 1976).
Justice Whittaker's concurrence
Justice Whittaker wrote separately to opine that sometimes, whether something is a gift is a mixed question of fact and law, not strictly a fact question as the majority wrote. Id. at 293.Justice Douglas's dissent
Justice Douglas dissented. He believed that both were gifts. Id.Justice Black's concurrence and dissent
While siding with the majority on Duberstein, Justice Black believed that Stanton's money was a gift. Id. at 294.Justice Frankfurter's concurrence and dissent
While siding with the majority on Duberstein, Justice Frankfurter believed that Stanton's money was definitely not a gift because it was given to him as a result of his hard work. Id. at 297-98. He explained that when "[T]hings of value [are] given to employees by their employers upon the termination of employment" or when an employer gives "payments entangled in a business relation and occasioned by the performance of some service," a " strong implication is that the payment is of a business nature" and, therefore, not a gift. Id. at 295-296.See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 363
- Bogardus v. CommissionerBogardus v. CommissionerBogardus v. Commissioner, was a case before the U.S. Supreme Court discussing, under United States tax law, how to distinguish compensation from tax-exempt gifts under §102...
,