|
|
|
|
Classical electromagnetism and special relativity
|
| |
|
| |
The theory of special relativity plays an important role in the modern theory of classical electromagnetism. First of all, it gives formulas for how electromagnetic objects, in particular the electric and magnetic fields, are altered under a Lorentz transformation from one inertial frame of reference to another. Second of all, it sheds light on the relationship between electricity and magnetism, for example showing that an electric force in one frame of reference may be a magnetic force in another and vice-versa, and likewise that certain laws of magnetism can be "derived" from corresponding laws of electricity and vice-versa.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Classical electromagnetism and special relativity' Start a new discussion about 'Classical electromagnetism and special relativity' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
The theory of special relativity plays an important role in the modern theory of classical electromagnetism. First of all, it gives formulas for how electromagnetic objects, in particular the electric and magnetic fields, are altered under a Lorentz transformation from one inertial frame of reference to another. Second of all, it sheds light on the relationship between electricity and magnetism, for example showing that an electric force in one frame of reference may be a magnetic force in another and vice-versa, and likewise that certain laws of magnetism can be "derived" from corresponding laws of electricity and vice-versa. Third, it motivates a compact and convenient notation for the laws of electromagnetism, namely the "manifestly covariant" tensor form.
Lorentz transformation rules for fields and forces
Consider two inertial frames. As notation, the field variables in one frame are unprimed, and in a frame moving relative to the unprimed frame at velocity v, the fields are denoted with primes. In addition, the fields parallel to the velocity v are denoted by while the fields perpendicular to v are denoted as . In these two frames moving at relative velocity v, the E-fields and B-fields are related by:
-
-
where
is called the Lorentz factor and c0 is the speed of light in free space. The inverse transformations are the same except v ? -v.
An equivalent, alternative expression is:
If a particle of charge moves with velocity with respect to frame S, then the Lorentz force in frame S is:
In frame S', the Lorentz force is:
If S and S' have aligned axes then:
A derivation for the transformation of the Lorentz force for the particular case is given here . A more general one can be seen here
Component by component, for relative motion along the x-axis, this works out to be the following:
The claim that the transformation rules for E and B take this particular form is equivalent to the claim that the electromagnetic tensor (defined below) is a covariant tensor.
Interrelationship between electricity and magnetism
Fields intermix in different frames
The above transformation rules show that the electric field in one frame contributes to the magnetic field in another frame, and vice versa. This is often described by saying that the electric field and magnetic field are two interrelated aspects of a single object, called the electromagnetic field. Indeed, the entire electromagnetic field can be encoded in a single rank-2 tensor called the electromagnetic tensor; see below.
Relationships between electric and magnetic laws
Some authors have attempted to derive various laws of magnetism, starting by assuming various laws of electricity, and also assuming that special relativity is true. For example, it has been surmised that the v×B component of the Lorentz force might be derived from Coulomb's law and special relativity if one assumes invariance of electric charge. See , Landau and Field. For more examples, see relativistic electromagnetism.
Moving magnet and conductor problem
A famous example of the intermixing of electric and magnetic phenomena in different frames of reference is called the "moving magnet and conductor problem", cited by Einstein in his 1905 paper on Special Relativity.
If a conductor moves with a constant velocity through the field of a stationary magnet, eddy currents will be produced due to a magnetic force on the electrons in the conductor. In the rest frame of the conductor, on the other hand, the magnet will be moving and the conductor stationary. Classical electromagnetic theory predicts that precisely the same microscopic eddy currents will be produced, but they will be due to an electric force.
Covariant formulation
The laws and objects in classical electromagnetism can be written in a form which is "manifestly covariant". In cgs-Gaussian units, the electric and magnetic fields combine into the covariant electromagnetic tensor:
The charge and current, meanwhile, combine into a four-vector called the four-current:
where is the charge density, is the current density, and c is the speed of light.
With these definitions, Maxwell's equations take the following manifestly covariant form:
where F aß is the electromagnetic tensor, J a is the 4-current, ? aß?d is the Levi-Civita symbol (a mathematical construct), and the indices behave according to the Einstein summation convention.
The first tensor equation is an expression of the two inhomogeneous Maxwell's equations, Gauss's Law and Ampere's Law (with Maxwell's correction). The second equation is an expression of the homogenous equations, Faraday's law of induction and Gauss's law for magnetism.
Another covariant electromagnetic object is the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor, a covariant rank-2 tensor which includes the Poynting vector, Maxwell stress tensor, and electromagnetic energy density. Yet another is the four-potential, a four-vector combining the electric potential and magnetic vector potential.
A particularly convenient gauge choice in a relativistic setting is the Lorenz gauge condition, which in terms of the four-potential takes the covariant form:
In the Lorenz gauge, Maxwell's equations can be written as (in cgs):
where denotes the d'Alembertian.
For a more comprehensive presentation of these topics, see Covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism.
Footnotes
|
| |
|
|
