|
|
|
|
Chisholm v. Georgia
|
| |
|
| |
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419 (1793), is considered by many to be the first United States Supreme Court case of great significance and impact. Because of its early date, there is little legal precedent (particularly in American law) available.
792 in South Carolina, Alexander Chisholm, the executor of the estate of Robert Farquhar, attempted to sue the state of Georgia in the Supreme Court over payments due him for goods that Farquhar had supplied Georgia during the American Revolutionary War.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Chisholm v. Georgia'
Start a new discussion about 'Chisholm v. Georgia'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419 (1793), is considered by many to be the first United States Supreme Court case of great significance and impact. Because of its early date, there is little legal precedent (particularly in American law) available.
Background of the case
In 1792 in South Carolina, Alexander Chisholm, the executor of the estate of Robert Farquhar, attempted to sue the state of Georgia in the Supreme Court over payments due him for goods that Farquhar had supplied Georgia during the American Revolutionary War. United States Attorney General Edmund Randolph argued the case for the plaintiff before the Court. The defendant, Georgia, refused to appear, claiming that as a "sovereign" a state did not have to appear in court to hear a suit against it to which it did not consent.
The Court's decision
The Court, in a 4–1 decision, found in favor of the plaintiff, with Chief Justice of the United States John Jay concurring with Justices Blair, Wilson, and Cushing, and Justice Iredell dissenting. (At the time, there was no one "majority" opinion; the Justices simply delivered their own opinions one by one, in order from the most junior to the most senior.) The Court argued that Article 3, Section 2, of the Constitution abrogated the States' sovereign immunity and granted federal courts the affirmative power to hear disputes between private citizens and States.
Subsequent developments
In 1795, largely as a result of Chisholm, the Eleventh Amendment was ratified, which removed federal jurisdiction in cases where citizens of one state or foreign countries attempt to sue another state. However, citizens of one state or foreign countries can still use the Federal courts if the state consents to be sued or if Congress, pursuant to a valid exercise of Fourteenth Amendment remedial powers, abrogates the states' immunity from suit. See, e.g., Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 (1976).
See also
External links
|
| |
|
|