|
|
|
|
Charter of Liberties
|
| |
|
| |
The Charter of Liberties, also called the Coronation Charter, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his ascension to the throne in 1100. It bound the King to certain laws regarding the treatment of church officials and nobles. It is considered a landmark document in English history and a forerunner of Magna Carta.
The document addressed certain abuses of royal power by his predecessor, his brother William Rufus, specifically the over-taxation of the barons, the abuse of vacant sees, and the practices of simony and pluralism.
The charter of liberties was generally ignored by monarchs until in 1213 Archbishop Langton reminded the nobles that their liberties had been guaranteed over a century prior in Henry I's Charter of Liberties.
lass="link1" onMouseover='showByLink("m1672130",this)' onMouseout='hide("m1672130")'href="http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Henry_I_of_England">Henry I of England, nicknamed Beauclerk, was the fourth and youngest son of William the Conqueror by his queen Matilda of Flanders.
Discussion
Ask a question about 'Charter of Liberties' Start a new discussion about 'Charter of Liberties' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
The Charter of Liberties, also called the Coronation Charter, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his ascension to the throne in 1100. It bound the King to certain laws regarding the treatment of church officials and nobles. It is considered a landmark document in English history and a forerunner of Magna Carta.
The document addressed certain abuses of royal power by his predecessor, his brother William Rufus, specifically the over-taxation of the barons, the abuse of vacant sees, and the practices of simony and pluralism.
The charter of liberties was generally ignored by monarchs until in 1213 Archbishop Langton reminded the nobles that their liberties had been guaranteed over a century prior in Henry I's Charter of Liberties.
Background leading to the Charter of Liberties
Henry I of England, nicknamed Beauclerk, was the fourth and youngest son of William the Conqueror by his queen Matilda of Flanders. The name Beauclerk was given because Henry was well educated, being able to read and write Latin, and possessed a knowledge of English law and natural history. He had received 5000 pounds of silver from his father, but no land holdings. He used this to purchase a district in Contentin in Normandy for 3000 pounds from his brother, Robert of Normandy. The latter had been given the Duchy of Normandy by his father, William the Conqueror, but had fallen into pecuniary difficulty. Various political intrigues occurred in France, which led to the imprisonment of Henry for two years by his other brother William Rufus, who had taken the throne of England upon the death of their brother, Richard. William Rufus assumed the name William II of England. Robert of Normandy left for the Crusade in 1096. Henry pledged an oath of fealty to Rufus who came to hold Normandy in the absence of Robert. Rufus William II of England died while hunting on August 2, 1100 (an arrow killed him.) Henry was present on this hunting trip. This was similar to the way the eldest son of William I, Richard, had died in 1081. The death of William II and the power vacuum from Robert’s absence allowed Henry to claim the English Crown in 1100.
Henry was immediately faced with three political problems: (1) His earls and barons did not accept him. (2) There was antagonism from the Church, especially over issues with Anselm of Canterbury. (3) The native Anglo-Saxon population was not conducive to the new king.
Henry made concessions to the Church by reconciling with Anselm. He accepted as his wife Edith, who was of mixed Anglo-Scots heritage and the daughter of Malcolm III, King of the Scots. This garnered great favor with the Anglo-Saxon population which viewed Edith as one of their own. The choice displeased the barons and earls. Edith changed her name to the Norman Maltilda. In order to ameliorate them, Henry entered into an agreement with the barons and earls. The Charter of Liberties was that agreement.
Summary of the Charter
After a traditional greeting, the Charter of Liberties contained fourteen declarations: These are summarized as follows:
Henry, king of the English, to Bishop Samson and Urso de Abetot and all his barons and faithful, both French and English, of Worcestershire, [copies were sent to all the shires] greeting.
The full text of the Charter of Liberties of Henry I, 1100, issued by the King when he ascended the throne is found below under external sources. The Charter granted the laws of Edward the Confessor, as amended by William the Conqueror, to the people, and established the rule of law in England. The Charter was an important pre-cursor to Magna Carta.
Results of the Charter
William the Conqueror had been a great admirer of the laws of Edward the Confessor. He had reformed many laws in an effort to make the law of Edward the common law of England, while establishing a strong Norman rule and custom. During the whole Norman period, there was little legislation. William Rufus had issued a charter in 1093. It proclaimed the freedom of the people and was done at a time when Rufus was ill and fearing death. This has been lost to history. It is believed to have freed prisoners, forgiven debts and assured that holy and good laws would be maintained. Whatever promises William Rufus made, he quickly broke after he recovered his health.
When Henry I assumed the throne in 1100, he was forced to make many concessions to the barons and earls. This formed the basis of the Charter of Liberties. Henry sent a strong message. He was returning to his father’s ways, which were viewed with great nostalgia. The abuses of William II were to be abolished. The corruption and larceny of reliefs, wardships, marriages, murder fines and so forth, was to end. Debts and past offences were to be forgiven. The demesne lands and military tenants were to be freed from the danegold of Danelaw. Above all, the “laga Eadwardii” Law of Edward the Confessor, as amended by William the Conqueror would be restored. The proclamation was made with the assumption that the barons would make the same concessions to their tenants as the king had promised to them. Plucknett is of the opinion that this good will probably did flow down the feudal chain. The Charter was not really legislation, but rather a promise to return to the law, as it existed in the time of William the Conqueror, and had been corrupted by William Rufus. The promises made in the Charter could not be enforced. There is ample evidence that Henry I ignored them. The Pipe Rolls which came thirty-one years into Henry’s reign indicate he had extended the power of the crown well beyond the limits set in the Charter of 1100. The establishment of the Exchequer, ostensively to end corruption and fraud in the taking and holding of taxes, in reality led to greater power of the crown. The direction of its chief minister, Bishop Roger of Salisbury evolved the law for tenants in chief which became the harshest and most severe in Europe. This occurred silently, and placed precedent upon precedent. Early in his reign, Henry issued a writ declaring the county and hundred courts should be held like in the days of Edward the Confessor. These had the result of bringing the ancient traditional tribunals in accordance with newer Norman methods. We are told by chroniclers that Henry legislated about theft, restored capital punishment (which had been suspended for a great many crimes by William Rufus), harshly treated utterers of bad money and rapacious exactions of his courtiers. He made his roving court and army the terror of every neighborhood. Henry made the measure of his own arm the standard ell.
The drowning of his son, William, in the accident of the White Ship in 1120, led to the end of Norman dynasty. Stephen of England was able to wrest the throne in 1135. He would be the last Norman king. His reign, and battles with Matilda the daughter of Henry I, led to The Anarchy.
Plucknett describes the Charter of Liberties as a forerunner to legislation in later years. There was no legislation, as such under the Saxons. Neither was there under the Normans. The Charter was a great concession, born of political need. Large portions of the charter were a withdrawal of practices which were of questionable legality, and corrosive politically. Various feudal dues, instead of being arbitrary and ad hoc, were declared to be reduced to reasonable limits.
The Charter led to an obscure decree of Stephen (1135-1154), the statutum decretum that established where there was no son, daughters would inherit. This was remarkable in its day, and pre-dated the reforms of Henry II of England.
The problems with the Church had been brewing for some time. William the Conqueror had tried to invest bishops with his temporal seal. Pope Gregory VII in 1075 had prohibited lay investiture, holding the Church was independent of the state. A long struggle ensued. This was still going on when Henry I assumed the throne, and entered into open conflict with Anselm. This conflict was moderated and ameliorated by the canon lawyer Ivo of Chartres. It was agreed that Henry could observe the selection of bishops, without interference. This accord was extended to all of Europe by 1122. The Concordat of Worms in 1122 did not last, but only changed the nature of tension between Church and State, which exists to this day. The government of Henry I at Westminster became exquisitely effective. The mechanism of Norman government needed a strong hand. Stephen was not up to it. Henry’s death was viewed as a great tragedy for several centuries:
“Then there was tribulation soon in the land, for every man that could forthwith robbed another...A good man (Henry I) he was, there was great awe of him. No man durst misdo against another in his time. He made peace for man and beast. Whoso bare his burden of gold and silver, no man durst say aught but good.”
During the lawlessness which occurred in the riegn of Stephen, Henry I came to be known as the "Lion of Justice", a title that he probably deserved.
The Charter of Liberties gave precedent to the Magna Carta and Great Charter of 1217 at the end of the the reign of John of England, and the beginning of that of the child Henry III of England.
See also
External sources
|
| |
|
|
