|
|
|
|
Appellate jurisdiction
|
| |
|
| |
Appellate jurisdiction is the power of a court to review decisions and change outcomes of decisions of lower courts. Most appellate jurisdiction is legislatively created, and may consist of appeals by leave of the appellate court or by right. Depending on the type of case and the decision below, appellate review primarily consists of: an entirely new hearing (a trial de novo); a hearing where the appellate court gives deference to factual findings of the lower court; or review of particular legal rulings made by the lower court (an appeal on the record).
Standard of review
Under its standard of review, an appellate court decides the extent of deference it would give to the lower court's decision, based on the fact or law of the appeal.
In reviewing an issue of fact, an appellate court ordinarily gives deference to the trial court's findings of fact.

Discussion
Ask a question about 'Appellate jurisdiction'
Start a new discussion about 'Appellate jurisdiction'
Answer questions from other users
|
Encyclopedia
Appellate jurisdiction is the power of a court to review decisions and change outcomes of decisions of lower courts. Most appellate jurisdiction is legislatively created, and may consist of appeals by leave of the appellate court or by right. Depending on the type of case and the decision below, appellate review primarily consists of: an entirely new hearing (a trial de novo); a hearing where the appellate court gives deference to factual findings of the lower court; or review of particular legal rulings made by the lower court (an appeal on the record).
Courts of the United States Under Article Three of the United States Constitution, all judicial power of the United States is vested in one supreme court, the Supreme Court of the United States.
http://www.uscourts.gov/rules/appel2007.pdf Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
Standard of review
Under its standard of review, an appellate court decides the extent of deference it would give to the lower court's decision, based on the fact or law of the appeal.
In reviewing an issue of fact, an appellate court ordinarily gives deference to the trial court's findings of fact. It is the duty of trial judges or juries to find facts, view the evidence firsthand, and observe witness testimony. When reviewing lower decisions on an issue of fact, courts of appeal generally look for "clear error". The appellate court reviews issues of law de novo (anew, no deference) and may reverse or modify the lower court's decision, if the appellate court believes the lower court misapplied the facts to the law or wrongly applied the law. An appellate court may also review the lower court judge's decisions of discretions, such as whether the judge properly granted a new trial or disallowed evidence. Review is for "abuse of discretion". This standard tends to be even more deferential than the "clear error" standard.
Sources
United States Constitution, Article III (1783).
-
- The courts of appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States, the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court. The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be limited to the jurisdiction described in sections 1292 (c) and (d) and 1295 of this title.
|
| |
|
|