|
|
|
|
90377 Sedna
|
| |
|
| |
90377 Sedna is a trans-Neptunian object and a likely dwarf planet, discovered by Michael Brown (Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory) and David Rabinowitz (Yale University) on November 14, 2003. It is currently 88 AU from the Sun, about three times as distant as Neptune. For most of its orbit Sedna is farther from the Sun than any other known dwarf planet candidate.
idered a detached object, Sedna was discovered during a survey conducted with the Samuel Oschin telescope at Palomar Observatory near San Diego, California (USA) using Yale's 160 megapixel Palomar Quest camera and was observed within days on telescopes from Chile, Spain, and the USA (Arizona, and Hawaii).
Discussion
Ask a question about '90377 Sedna' Start a new discussion about '90377 Sedna' Answer questions from other users |
Encyclopedia
90377 Sedna is a trans-Neptunian object and a likely dwarf planet, discovered by Michael Brown (Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory) and David Rabinowitz (Yale University) on November 14, 2003. It is currently 88 AU from the Sun, about three times as distant as Neptune. For most of its orbit Sedna is farther from the Sun than any other known dwarf planet candidate.
Discovery
Considered a detached object, Sedna was discovered during a survey conducted with the Samuel Oschin telescope at Palomar Observatory near San Diego, California (USA) using Yale's 160 megapixel Palomar Quest camera and was observed within days on telescopes from Chile, Spain, and the USA (Arizona, and Hawaii). NASA's orbiting Spitzer Space Telescope was also pointed toward the object, but could not detect it – putting an upper-bound on its diameter at roughly three-quarters that of Pluto.
The object is named after Sedna, the Inuit goddess of the sea, who was believed to live in the cold depths of the Arctic Ocean. Before Sedna was officially named it had provisional designation .
Orbital characteristics
Sedna has a highly elliptical orbit, with its aphelion estimated at 975 AU and its perihelion at about 76.16 AU. At its discovery it was approaching perihelion and about 89.6 AU from the Sun. At the time of its discovery it was the most distant object in the solar system yet observed; although the orbits of some objects—like long-period comets—extend further than that of Sedna, they are basically too dim to be observed except near perihelion. Eris was later detected at 97 AU.
Sedna's precise orbital period is not yet known, but it is calculated at between 10.5 and 12.0 thousand years. It should reach perihelion in late 2075 to mid 2076. Sedna will overtake Eris as the farthest known spheroid orbiting the Sun in 2114.
A study done by Hal Levison and Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur (OCA) in Nice, France, suggested that the most likely explanation for Sedna's orbit was that it had been perturbed by a close (~800 AU) pass by another star in the first 100 million years or so of the solar system's existence, possibly one of the other stars that formed out of the same collapsing nebula as the Sun.
They proposed another, though less probable scenario, which however manages to explain Sedna's orbit more accurately: Sedna could have formed around a brown dwarf about 20 times less massive than the Sun and have been captured by the solar system when the brown dwarf passed through it.
Another possible explanation, advanced by Gomes, involves perturbations of Sedna's orbit by a hypothetical planetary-sized body in the inner Oort cloud. Recent simulations show that Sedna's orbital characteristics could be explained by perturbations by a Neptune-mass object at 2000 AU (or less), a Jupiter-mass at 5000 AU, or even an Earth-mass object at 1000 AU.
Another object, , has an orbit similar to Sedna's but a bit less extreme: perihelion is 44.3 AU, aphelion is 394 AU, and the orbital period is 3240 years. Its orbit may have resulted from the same processes that produced Sedna's orbit.
When first discovered, Sedna was believed to have an unusually long rotational period (20 to 50 days). A search was thus made for a natural satellite, the most likely cause for such a long rotation, but investigation by the Hubble Space Telescope in March 2004 observed no such object orbiting the planetoid. New measurements from the MMT telescope suggest a much shorter rotation period, only about 10 hours, rather typical for bodies of its size.
Physical characteristics
Image:EightTNOs.png|thumb|410px|right|Sedna compared with Eris, Pluto, Makemake, Haumea, Varuna, Orcus, Quaoar, and Earth
- Earth
rect 646 1714 2142 1994 The Earth
- Eris and Dysnomia
circle 226 412 16 Dysnomia
circle 350 626 197 (136199) Eris
- Pluto and Charon
circle 1252 684 86 Charon
circle 1038 632 188 (134340) Pluto
- Makemake
circle 1786 614 142 (136472) Makemake
- Haumea
circle 2438 616 155 (136108) Haumea
- Sedna
circle 342 1305 137 (90377) Sedna
- Orcus
circle 1088 1305 114 (90482) Orcus
- Quaoar
circle 1784 1305 97 (50000) Quaoar
- Varuna
circle 2420 1305 58 (20000) Varuna
- link to image (under all other links)
rect 0 0 2749 1994
desc none
- - setting this to "bottom-right" will display a (rather large) icon linking to the graphic, if desired
- Notes:
- Details on the new coding for clickable images is here: mw:Extension:ImageMap
- While it may look strange, it's important to keep the codes for a particular system in order. The clickable coding treats the first object created in an area as the one on top.
- Moons should be placed on "top" so that their smaller circles won't disappear "under" their respective primaries.
Sedna has an absolute magnitude (H) of 1.6, and is estimated to have an albedo of 0.16 to 0.30, thus giving it a diameter between 1200 and 1600 kilometres. At the time of its discovery it was the largest object found in the solar system since Pluto was discovered in 1930. It is now generally believed to be the 5th largest known trans-Neptunian object after Eris, Pluto, , and . Sedna is so far from the Sun that the temperature never rises above 33 kelvin (−240 °C; −400 °F).
Observations from Chile show that Sedna is one of the reddest objects in the solar system, nearly as red as Mars. Unlike Pluto and Charon, Sedna appears to have very little methane ice or water ice on its surface; Chad Trujillo and his colleagues at the Gemini Observatory in Hawaii suggest that Sedna's dark red color is caused by a hydrocarbon sludge, or tholin, like that found on 5145 Pholus. Its surface is homogeneous in colour and spectrum; this is probably because Sedna, unlike objects nearer the sun, is rarely impacted by other bodies, which would expose bright patches like that on 8405 Asbolus.
Sedna's and Triton's spectra have been recently compared suggesting the following common model of the surface: 24% Triton tholin, 7% amorphous carbon, 26% methanol ice with 33% methane.
Classification
The discoverers have argued that Sedna is actually the first observed body belonging to the Oort cloud, saying that it is too far out to be considered a scattered disk object. Because it is a great deal closer to the Sun than was expected for an Oort cloud object, and has an inclination roughly in line with the planets and the Kuiper belt, they described the planetoid as being an inner Oort cloud object, situated in the disc reaching from the Kuiper belt to the spherical part of the cloud.
A number of explanations for Sedna's unusual orbit have been put forward since, including the gravitational influence of a passing star or a distant, planet-sized object.
Sedna, together with a few other objects (e.g. ), prompted suggestions of a new category of distant objects named extended scattered disc (E-SDO), detached objects, distant detached objects (DDO) or scattered-extended in the formal classification by the Deep Ecliptic Survey.
The last classification, introduces a formal distinction between scattered-near objects (which could be scattered by Neptune) e.g. Eris from scattered-extended objects like Sedna. The distinction is made formally, using the orbital elements (see Tisserand's parameter).
The discovery of Sedna resurrected the question of which astronomical objects should be considered planets and which should not. On March 15, 2004 articles in the popular press reported that "the tenth planet has been discovered". This question was answered under the new International Astronomical Union definition of a planet, adopted on August 24, 2006. It is unknown whether or not Sedna is in hydrostatic equilibrium. If, as currently suspected, it is, then it would qualify as a dwarf planet. Sedna has a Stern–Levison parameter estimated at between 8 and 6 times that of Pluto, and therefore cannot be considered to have cleared the neighbourhood of its orbit, even though no other objects have yet been discovered in its vicinity.
See also
Bibliography
- (Brown et.al., submitted to ApJ Letters, March 16, 2004)
- Hurt, Robert. . California, USA: Infrared Processing and Analysis Center. March 15, 2004.
- Hurt, Robert. . California, USA: Infrared Processing and Analysis Center. March 15, 2004.
- JPL. . Press release: Jet Propulsion Laboratory. March 15, 2004.
- Whitehourse, David. . BBC News. April 14, 2004.
External links
- (Discovery Photos)
- by Alessandro Morbidelli and Harold F. Levison
- on
- from JPL (Java) /
|
| |
|
|
