It all hinges on the theoretical interpretation of 1 over 0 (the fraction of 1 divided by 0) this is said by some to mean infinity - approaching the speed of light an object is infinitely large) so you cannot travel faster.Or by some to mean zero (there are no "nothings" in one). This would mean that a body coming to the speed of light would disappear - i.e travel in time.

He tried to hide the lorentz equasion by adding a lot of trivial math assumptions, and did not refer to lorentz, probably thinking he could get away with the plaguarism. Only someone with his head in the sand would even consider it correct, and the speed of light ? This is 2010, study the electromagnetic spectrum, and all the various sources of light, from luminol to laser, and discover the variables that affect the various resonant wave frequencies refered to as light. To make a statement about the speed of light is a part of academic history, during the process of discovering the electromagnetic spectrum, Its meaningless, or at best a theory, whereby some make statements of it having been verified, the statements themselves flawed beyond redemption. Acadamic ventures, in the business of selling information to the hireling classes, mostly, and to the lower nobility classes, like doctors and lawyers, if you have the cash they have the accreditation. However, giving credibility to someone, and their having actually attained it are two different things. Education occurs from interest alone and requires a lifetime of study, well beyond the magnitudes of academia. Our society is based upon deception, we are living a series of lies, rapidly approaching the next great ice age, The study of science more important than any other, ruled by self serving lawyers, fueled by lust and greed. The society of man, left to its own devises wil not end well

Science is always being proven wrong. Man, as inventor, tries to defend his errors. Look elsewhere.

Einstein was no inventor