JoseSeveriano
A New Vision obout the Universe
To start with, we must consider the two main theories about the creation and evolution from the universe :
1st-the theory of “Big-Bang”;
2nd-the theory of a “Bang”, or several “Bangs” or the multiverse theory.
The theory of a “Big-Bang”, naturally emerged from an observation of a phenomenom by the astronomer Hubble, whom arrived to the conclusion (by observation) that the universe it is expanding. This observation gave the birth to the universe another meaning for its evolution.
If the universe it is expanding, arriving to its now known (aproximatelly) dimension, it would imply that somewhere in the past it was much more smaller then it is now (everything we see was concentrate in a tiny point), or to be more precise, sometime all that we can see was concentrate in a tiny space (a singularity), due to this conclusion we have arrived too, to the conclusion that something catastrophic happened in the begining, that we called a “Big-Bang”.
With the “Big-Bang”, space and time began, and finally we arrived to the actual scenario.
Some things became (at the time, and some are until now) unexplained althought, for example, at which rate its expansion ocurred initially ? Will the universe have an end ? What will hapen at the end ? Will be happen a Big-Crunch, and all start again ? Is the universe cyclic or it will expand forever, the Big-Rip ?
Recently, a cosmologist (W. Gut) devised a good explanation to this (accepted by the scientific community), “inflation”, to explain it we must think that at the very beginning the universe expanded exponentially (at a super-luminal rate), there was no space no time. At the first glimpse we would think that a constant stablished by Albert Einstein was being violated, that show to us that the speed of light is an universal constant (independently from the referential), but this does not occur, more space and time was being created at all.
Now we have to go backward in time and remember another physicist, named Hugh Everett III, that introduced (due to an interpretation from the paradox of the cat of Schröndiger) the concept of MWI (Multi-World-Interpretation and the superposition of states too).
This interpretation lead to a concept of multi-universes, not Just one.
One of the most interesting theories about this (for me), divised by Neil Turok, Robert Steinhardt and others, was the brane universes (universes in a membrane), here we arrive to a point where we can put together two theories, the string theory and this of multi-universes, represented as membrane universes.
The string theory by its side, needs to have, to be consistent, that space has (at least) 11 dimensions, so the membrane universes too, I say.
This theory lead too, to a conclusion (at minimum) curious, that there wasn´t the need of a “Big-Bang”, and that what really could have occurred was Just a “Bang” to create our own universe (a huge burst of energy due to the collision between two brane-universes).
We may question what it would mean at least ? The eventual collisions between these “Brane-Universes” would be enough to generate a “Bang” so powerful as a “Big-Bang” so a new universe would be created ?
Now, I would introduce a new idea, that not Just one new universe would be created by these collisions, but two, or by pairs. One universe at the very beginning “entangled” with the other within a brief time, so that when this “entanglement” is broken a new and powerfull amount of energy will be introduced in the system so that it will expand exponentially (in an inflationary way, indeed).
There would appear too a paradox, from our point of view, we cannot distinguish a “Big-Bang” event from that of a “Bang” event, they will appear to us to be the same phenomenom, and behave as.
Other thing that I have been thinking about is that (by the observational results) the universe instead of slowing its expansion, indeed it is accelerating (due to the existence of what we called DM and DE, in accordance to some theories). The question that remains, is this expansion “inflationary” too ?
As one thing conduct us to another, I am convicted (and I have been studying it) that each of the infinity number of universes are at least hiper-huge-massive Black holes too, and behaves as.
The singularity is still there, the events horizon too.
It may look, perhaps at first glance paradoxal, but it ins´t, take the brane-universe, with 11 dimmensions (in accordance with ST) we could conceive, for example that a surface of Kalabi-Yau as the projection of a brane-universe into a lower dimension, and doing so we could arrive to a Möebius surface of 3 dimensions. The Möebius surface it is interesting because, althought exists in 3 dimensions, Just have a face and an edge. It will occurs with a Kalabi-Yau surface and for consequence with a brane-universe, in a much higher dimension !
At this point someonelse would do the question : why am I talking about, Möebius , Kalabi-Yau, surfaces, etc ?
Simple, bringing to a lower dimension the representation of a brane-universe we could study its properties and infer those related to our own universe as a brane-universe or not.
Other question that I want to raise here is that the “background noise”, result of a “Big-Bang” or a “bang”, seems to come from any direction we look to, but I would state that this noise Just come from a point, “the singularity”, itself !
The fluctuations we observe in this “background noise” are due in reallity result from the interference of “dark Matter” and “dark Energy” !
Thru recent discovered papers from Albert Einstein, even him speculated about the “Big-Bang”, and in some way was open to others alternatives.
By the other side there is an entity that have intrigued me for several years and I have been studying its role in the evolution from the universe, Neutrinos. This entity, for me, takes a fundamental role in the process of evolution of our universe and that is of real importance.
They, for me, are one of the most intriguing entities until now discovered, and you will see how. They have some strangeness that amaze, at least, us :
-its too feeble interaction with the common matter, they have no charge;
-its abundance, they are the second most abundant sub-particle in the known universe. Being Just behind the photons;
-the speed at which it displaces, almost that of the light (99.9998 %);
-its very tiny mass;
-and the most strange of all, they oscillate, or to be more precise they change its “flavor” as travelling thru the universe.
The last strangeness its that I have been studying, and arrived to some conclusions, maybe interesting :
-in the process of oscillation a neutrino –a- becomes a neutrino –b-, in this process I have arrived to a relation between the phenomenom of the role of two other entities (both theoretical), that I named Planck-Black-Holes and Planck-Wormholes;
-by some papers I have read there appear to exist a tight relation between BH and WH, where is one the other will be there;
-by the Shcwarszild metric, at least theoretically, the smaller BH we may have will have the Planck´s Mass, as the neutrino´s mass is almost kinetic, I divised a process by which the neutrino´s kinetic mass becomes that of the Planck´s mass, then a pulse occurs and the neutrino gives the origin to a pBH and consenquently a counterpart appear, a pWH. The pBH, By the Hawking´s Law of evaporation from a BH, in a burst will supply the pWH with all energy needed to keep it open, then when the total energy evaporated by the pBH finish , a neutrino in a different state (of energy) will appear, and the excess of energy will be “pumped” into the universe as DE or DM, this process is self-contained;
-this process occurs in such a way that, for na external observer, he won´t be able to detect any amount of energy generated in the process of oscillation (is Aleph null), so that if we could follow the trajectory of a neutrino it would look like more to a “dashed” line;
-the last conclusion I have arrived is that we are immersed in billlions and billions of pBH and pWH, at room temperature.
You may ask me which is the connection from this entytie and the evolution from the universe, and I would tell you that this phenomenom is responsible for, at least, a part from DE and DM, and consenquently may explain its accelerated expansion.
Petropolis,april the 2nd of 2014
Jose Severiano Lopes de Queiroz Neto
Open to discussion
To start with, we must consider the two main theories about the creation and evolution from the universe :
1st-the theory of “Big-Bang”;
2nd-the theory of a “Bang”, or several “Bangs” or the multiverse theory.
The theory of a “Big-Bang”, naturally emerged from an observation of a phenomenom by the astronomer Hubble, whom arrived to the conclusion (by observation) that the universe it is expanding. This observation gave the birth to the universe another meaning for its evolution.
If the universe it is expanding, arriving to its now known (aproximatelly) dimension, it would imply that somewhere in the past it was much more smaller then it is now (everything we see was concentrate in a tiny point), or to be more precise, sometime all that we can see was concentrate in a tiny space (a singularity), due to this conclusion we have arrived too, to the conclusion that something catastrophic happened in the begining, that we called a “Big-Bang”.
With the “Big-Bang”, space and time began, and finally we arrived to the actual scenario.
Some things became (at the time, and some are until now) unexplained althought, for example, at which rate its expansion ocurred initially ? Will the universe have an end ? What will hapen at the end ? Will be happen a Big-Crunch, and all start again ? Is the universe cyclic or it will expand forever, the Big-Rip ?
Recently, a cosmologist (W. Gut) devised a good explanation to this (accepted by the scientific community), “inflation”, to explain it we must think that at the very beginning the universe expanded exponentially (at a super-luminal rate), there was no space no time. At the first glimpse we would think that a constant stablished by Albert Einstein was being violated, that show to us that the speed of light is an universal constant (independently from the referential), but this does not occur, more space and time was being created at all.
Now we have to go backward in time and remember another physicist, named Hugh Everett III, that introduced (due to an interpretation from the paradox of the cat of Schröndiger) the concept of MWI (Multi-World-Interpretation and the superposition of states too).
This interpretation lead to a concept of multi-universes, not Just one.
One of the most interesting theories about this (for me), divised by Neil Turok, Robert Steinhardt and others, was the brane universes (universes in a membrane), here we arrive to a point where we can put together two theories, the string theory and this of multi-universes, represented as membrane universes.
The string theory by its side, needs to have, to be consistent, that space has (at least) 11 dimensions, so the membrane universes too, I say.
This theory lead too, to a conclusion (at minimum) curious, that there wasn´t the need of a “Big-Bang”, and that what really could have occurred was Just a “Bang” to create our own universe (a huge burst of energy due to the collision between two brane-universes).
We may question what it would mean at least ? The eventual collisions between these “Brane-Universes” would be enough to generate a “Bang” so powerful as a “Big-Bang” so a new universe would be created ?
Now, I would introduce a new idea, that not Just one new universe would be created by these collisions, but two, or by pairs. One universe at the very beginning “entangled” with the other within a brief time, so that when this “entanglement” is broken a new and powerfull amount of energy will be introduced in the system so that it will expand exponentially (in an inflationary way, indeed).
There would appear too a paradox, from our point of view, we cannot distinguish a “Big-Bang” event from that of a “Bang” event, they will appear to us to be the same phenomenom, and behave as.
Other thing that I have been thinking about is that (by the observational results) the universe instead of slowing its expansion, indeed it is accelerating (due to the existence of what we called DM and DE, in accordance to some theories). The question that remains, is this expansion “inflationary” too ?
As one thing conduct us to another, I am convicted (and I have been studying it) that each of the infinity number of universes are at least hiper-huge-massive Black holes too, and behaves as.
The singularity is still there, the events horizon too.
It may look, perhaps at first glance paradoxal, but it ins´t, take the brane-universe, with 11 dimmensions (in accordance with ST) we could conceive, for example that a surface of Kalabi-Yau as the projection of a brane-universe into a lower dimension, and doing so we could arrive to a Möebius surface of 3 dimensions. The Möebius surface it is interesting because, althought exists in 3 dimensions, Just have a face and an edge. It will occurs with a Kalabi-Yau surface and for consequence with a brane-universe, in a much higher dimension !
At this point someonelse would do the question : why am I talking about, Möebius , Kalabi-Yau, surfaces, etc ?
Simple, bringing to a lower dimension the representation of a brane-universe we could study its properties and infer those related to our own universe as a brane-universe or not.
Other question that I want to raise here is that the “background noise”, result of a “Big-Bang” or a “bang”, seems to come from any direction we look to, but I would state that this noise Just come from a point, “the singularity”, itself !
The fluctuations we observe in this “background noise” are due in reallity result from the interference of “dark Matter” and “dark Energy” !
Thru recent discovered papers from Albert Einstein, even him speculated about the “Big-Bang”, and in some way was open to others alternatives.
By the other side there is an entity that have intrigued me for several years and I have been studying its role in the evolution from the universe, Neutrinos. This entity, for me, takes a fundamental role in the process of evolution of our universe and that is of real importance.
They, for me, are one of the most intriguing entities until now discovered, and you will see how. They have some strangeness that amaze, at least, us :
-its too feeble interaction with the common matter, they have no charge;
-its abundance, they are the second most abundant sub-particle in the known universe. Being Just behind the photons;
-the speed at which it displaces, almost that of the light (99.9998 %);
-its very tiny mass;
-and the most strange of all, they oscillate, or to be more precise they change its “flavor” as travelling thru the universe.
The last strangeness its that I have been studying, and arrived to some conclusions, maybe interesting :
-in the process of oscillation a neutrino –a- becomes a neutrino –b-, in this process I have arrived to a relation between the phenomenom of the role of two other entities (both theoretical), that I named Planck-Black-Holes and Planck-Wormholes;
-by some papers I have read there appear to exist a tight relation between BH and WH, where is one the other will be there;
-by the Shcwarszild metric, at least theoretically, the smaller BH we may have will have the Planck´s Mass, as the neutrino´s mass is almost kinetic, I divised a process by which the neutrino´s kinetic mass becomes that of the Planck´s mass, then a pulse occurs and the neutrino gives the origin to a pBH and consenquently a counterpart appear, a pWH. The pBH, By the Hawking´s Law of evaporation from a BH, in a burst will supply the pWH with all energy needed to keep it open, then when the total energy evaporated by the pBH finish , a neutrino in a different state (of energy) will appear, and the excess of energy will be “pumped” into the universe as DE or DM, this process is self-contained;
-this process occurs in such a way that, for na external observer, he won´t be able to detect any amount of energy generated in the process of oscillation (is Aleph null), so that if we could follow the trajectory of a neutrino it would look like more to a “dashed” line;
-the last conclusion I have arrived is that we are immersed in billlions and billions of pBH and pWH, at room temperature.
You may ask me which is the connection from this entytie and the evolution from the universe, and I would tell you that this phenomenom is responsible for, at least, a part from DE and DM, and consenquently may explain its accelerated expansion.
Petropolis,april the 2nd of 2014
Jose Severiano Lopes de Queiroz Neto
Open to discussion
