chalidze
On the Stability Of A Vortex World
(A Heavenly Appendix To My Vortex Theory of Matter*)
As described in my theory, the world is not stable forever. Only a few
particles exist for a long time, being stabilized by the pressure of
vortex gas. That gas -- made out of "vortons" (tiny vortex rings) -- is
not stable itself, as the vortons are splitting into smaller and smaller
vortex rings. There is no way to say how quickly this happens, or for how
long the present vortex gas will keep the existing main particles stable.
Keeping in mind the constant splitting of vortons, I can conclude that a
long time ago they were not as tiny as now and could not support the
stability of tiny particles as existing protons and electrons. The larger
vortons could be stabilizing much larger particles, which may even be
similar in topology to recent elementary particles. As vortons became
smaller, they could not keep stabilizing the larger particles, allowing their
destruction. Such destruction could turn out to be unstoppable, with all
vortices getting smaller and smaller and joining the vortex gas; or it
could reach another state of temporary stability, which is what we have
now: protons, electrons and photons stabilized by the gas of tiny vortons.
We have no scale to judge what is really large and what is really tiny. We
only observe that galaxies are larger then our elementary particles. And
galaxies, I am suggesting, are what is becoming of deteriorating
elementary particles of a previous "larger world" -- vorticular filaments
of large rings are splitting and giving birth to a huge quantity of
smaller and smaller rings, which are becoming new particles and new
vortons. Destruction of a previous world led to the appearance of our
"small world". (That is, assuming that galaxies were not born from the
deterioration of random and originally unstable vortex rings. Stable or
not, what is left of those rings must still be inside of some or all
galaxies, covered by a shiny screen of stars born as result of this
vorticular deterioration).
With our level of knowledge, we cannot determine if ours is the smallest
possible world or if that larger one was the largest. In fact, we cannot
know how many times such transformations from larger to smaller worlds
have occurred, or might occur in the future. A decisive piece of ignorance
here is the absence of any hint as to whether ether is corpuscular or
absolutely continuous.
This somewhat fantastic hypothesis invites astronomers to search for order
among galaxies. Maybe one day archaeo-archaeologists will find a rusty
nail in the sky, or paleo-paleontologists will show us the remnants of
some flower. The chances are slim, but this is what we humans do: search
for order, or what might left of it.
Jan 8, 2012 Valery Chalidze
* See Mass And Electric Charge In The Vortex Theory Of Matter, [Now in public domain.
http://www.worksofvalerychalidze.com/My e-mail VRAZHEK43 at Google com.]
(A Heavenly Appendix To My Vortex Theory of Matter*)
As described in my theory, the world is not stable forever. Only a few
particles exist for a long time, being stabilized by the pressure of
vortex gas. That gas -- made out of "vortons" (tiny vortex rings) -- is
not stable itself, as the vortons are splitting into smaller and smaller
vortex rings. There is no way to say how quickly this happens, or for how
long the present vortex gas will keep the existing main particles stable.
Keeping in mind the constant splitting of vortons, I can conclude that a
long time ago they were not as tiny as now and could not support the
stability of tiny particles as existing protons and electrons. The larger
vortons could be stabilizing much larger particles, which may even be
similar in topology to recent elementary particles. As vortons became
smaller, they could not keep stabilizing the larger particles, allowing their
destruction. Such destruction could turn out to be unstoppable, with all
vortices getting smaller and smaller and joining the vortex gas; or it
could reach another state of temporary stability, which is what we have
now: protons, electrons and photons stabilized by the gas of tiny vortons.
We have no scale to judge what is really large and what is really tiny. We
only observe that galaxies are larger then our elementary particles. And
galaxies, I am suggesting, are what is becoming of deteriorating
elementary particles of a previous "larger world" -- vorticular filaments
of large rings are splitting and giving birth to a huge quantity of
smaller and smaller rings, which are becoming new particles and new
vortons. Destruction of a previous world led to the appearance of our
"small world". (That is, assuming that galaxies were not born from the
deterioration of random and originally unstable vortex rings. Stable or
not, what is left of those rings must still be inside of some or all
galaxies, covered by a shiny screen of stars born as result of this
vorticular deterioration).
With our level of knowledge, we cannot determine if ours is the smallest
possible world or if that larger one was the largest. In fact, we cannot
know how many times such transformations from larger to smaller worlds
have occurred, or might occur in the future. A decisive piece of ignorance
here is the absence of any hint as to whether ether is corpuscular or
absolutely continuous.
This somewhat fantastic hypothesis invites astronomers to search for order
among galaxies. Maybe one day archaeo-archaeologists will find a rusty
nail in the sky, or paleo-paleontologists will show us the remnants of
some flower. The chances are slim, but this is what we humans do: search
for order, or what might left of it.
Jan 8, 2012 Valery Chalidze
* See Mass And Electric Charge In The Vortex Theory Of Matter, [Now in public domain.
http://www.worksofvalerychalidze.com/My e-mail VRAZHEK43 at Google com.]