khethelo
Did Leonardo da Vinci did all those powerful degree`s or he was just given. I don`t think so the people from italy,are misinterpreting history so the world would call them the best people ever lived
Leonardo da Vinci
Posts 1 - 2 of 2
replied to: khethelo
victoriageorguss
Replied to: Did Leonardo da Vinci did all those powerful degree`s or he...
In Van Gogh, where it is easy to acknowledge that not every one sees starry night the way he sees it.
Altering and hypothetical attitudes, after examining Van Gogh we can tell, that he had them understood while Da Vinci had them disguised (altering and hypothetical attitude)in his efforts. No execute that the paintings are of real people as patrons, to earn money and some he used as models for his researches. Example: Vitruvian Man
In a personal study I found that Da Vinic when compared to VanVogh, VanGogh had an 80-70% self attitude in his paintings.if you measure our acknowledgment at the subject it is about 10-30 the rest is totally VanGogh both artists
paint from real life and scenery in Da Vinci’s case he hadonly 10-20%self attitude the rest are ours.
Very hard to detect except after getting exposed to articles and studies that claim a resemblance between him and his paintings!
His personal portrait with long facial hair, messy long hair and strong facials they are same to hypothetical looks of a horse he sketched and in his humans paintings
there is 10-20% of him but still hard to detect him, except after getting exposed to articles and so. O suppose to thinking that people noticed resemblance between him and his painitngs right away when looking at them.Inreal, because most people didn’t know how he looked like, but art researchers knew what they wanted out their propaganda and against such painter a genius,that he is an insane man.
because he can’t do all that inventions. Bottom line is, DaVinci like every other great painter has got to leave us with a hint of him even in portraits of others in his work,a case of more fleshy and hearted than that of VanGogh overwhelming hypothetical Starry Night .
Always remember the anatomy sketches and the horse and you will understand.
this was also a reply to
yellowcabjulita Q
Altering and hypothetical attitudes, after examining Van Gogh we can tell, that he had them understood while Da Vinci had them disguised (altering and hypothetical attitude)in his efforts. No execute that the paintings are of real people as patrons, to earn money and some he used as models for his researches. Example: Vitruvian Man
In a personal study I found that Da Vinic when compared to VanVogh, VanGogh had an 80-70% self attitude in his paintings.if you measure our acknowledgment at the subject it is about 10-30 the rest is totally VanGogh both artists
paint from real life and scenery in Da Vinci’s case he hadonly 10-20%self attitude the rest are ours.
Very hard to detect except after getting exposed to articles and studies that claim a resemblance between him and his paintings!
His personal portrait with long facial hair, messy long hair and strong facials they are same to hypothetical looks of a horse he sketched and in his humans paintings
there is 10-20% of him but still hard to detect him, except after getting exposed to articles and so. O suppose to thinking that people noticed resemblance between him and his painitngs right away when looking at them.Inreal, because most people didn’t know how he looked like, but art researchers knew what they wanted out their propaganda and against such painter a genius,that he is an insane man.
because he can’t do all that inventions. Bottom line is, DaVinci like every other great painter has got to leave us with a hint of him even in portraits of others in his work,a case of more fleshy and hearted than that of VanGogh overwhelming hypothetical Starry Night .
Always remember the anatomy sketches and the horse and you will understand.
this was also a reply to
yellowcabjulita Q